Spam and Abuse Watch

26-Oct-15 1:05

Abuser[^]
~~Spam[^]~~

modified 26-Oct-15 7:38am.

Thanks787226-Oct-15 1:33

26-Oct-15 1:33

It's Abuse,not Spam.

Spam = Advertisement

Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning

Mario Z26-Oct-15 1:38

26-Oct-15 1:38

Edited

Mario Z26-Oct-15 1:53

26-Oct-15 1:53

I apologize for bothering you with this but could you point me to where exactly did you pick up this statement (spam = advertisement). I don't see it in CP's Terms Of Service, also I'm not sure if it's a smart choice to limit the meaning of spam term to just that...

Also this sort of content must not pass the spam filter so I don't see any harm in calling it either way.

But nevertheless I will agree that trolling is better suited for that user's actions.

Thanks787226-Oct-15 2:05

26-Oct-15 2:05

Mario Z wrote:
I don't see it in CP's Terms Of Service, also I'm not sure if it's a smart choice to limit the meaning of spam term to just that...

What is Spam?[^]

Mario Z wrote:
Also this sort of content must not pass the spam filter so I don't see any harm in calling it either way

Content is Spam or Abuse has nothing to do with how filters work.

Mario Z26-Oct-15 2:51

26-Oct-15 2:51

That is your answer, seriously?

First I'll say that is very rude from you, you gave me no explanation at all.

Second I see you don't remember something that you said to me some time back, let me refresh your memory. That time I gave you the meaning of spam and your answer was:

Rohan Leuva wrote:

i am concerned only about how Codeproject considers something as spam.

And now you gave me a link from which I should find what the spam is. Does this seam consistent to you (I think not)?

Third regarding the spam filter, that is my point exactly. If the use of spam or abuse report will not harm the filters work then why are we bothering me with how the user is reported.
Why don't we just agree that the user had malicious intentions and leave it at that.

Please for future references define your rules or whatever, stick with them, mention them to others (like myself) and we will follow them. Also please don't send me the LMGTFY links. I believe I've contributed enough to CP to get and give mutual respect from CP members.

Thanks787226-Oct-15 3:18

26-Oct-15 3:18

Mario Z wrote:
First I'll say that is very rude from you, you gave me no explanation at all

Since when no explanation/link to some relevant info became rude? I repeat : i am concerned only about how Codeproject considers something as spam. I pointed out the link which shows actual meaning of spam and Codeproject works the same way. So i think explanation is enough. Don't you think so?

Mario Z wrote:
Please for future references define your rules or whatever

Why? I mean why?

Mario Z wrote:
and we will follow them

You are not suppose to do that,really. This site has its own rules. I'm not the owner of this site.

Mario Z26-Oct-15 3:41

Another ridiculous article

26-Oct-15 3:41

The rude thing is to send a LMGTFY link as if I'm a person that does not know how to use google. Was it not easier just to say google it or send me google's link or send me an actually link to a proper resource? You actually made an effort to create and send a LMGTFY link instead.

Also another thing, just like with this message now, you're too fast on answering things without giving it any thought. Again as I mentioned and shown you before your definition of spam differs from what is generally considered a spam. That referenced message shows you that you treated something that is a spam by definition (and actually by CP rules) as if it was not. Actually after that discussion that I had with you I noticed on few occasions the reporting of duplicated content which was of course removed by CP members.
So the conclusion is that, even worse, you got the wrong idea of what the CP members actually think is a spam.

But the main point here is, and I really don't understand how you're not getting this, when I gave you what you gave me just now then you rejected it, you literally said "I would not".

Gone

D V L26-Oct-15 1:53

D V L

26-Oct-15 1:53

Gone

DVL

super26-Oct-15 0:13

26-Oct-15 0:13

Another piece of junk[^]

All my three post below are from the same member. Not posting his link because not sure if he should be reported.

cheers,

Super

------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it

Thanks787226-Oct-15 0:26

26-Oct-15 0:26

It's Tech blog,not an Article. Tech Blogs are accepted in such forms. Nothing to report here.

super26-Oct-15 0:27

26-Oct-15 0:27

What about multiple entry of the same topic from same person?

cheers,

Super

------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it

Thanks787226-Oct-15 0:30

26-Oct-15 0:30

That should be some issue with the feed because Blogs are pulled,not published by authors.

This is not an article/ Images not referenced

Chris Maunder26-Oct-15 3:22

Chris Maunder

26-Oct-15 3:22

No they are not.

A technical blog is still an article and must be held to the same standards as an article. The only difference is that Technical blog articles are submitted via a member's blog feed.

cheers
Chris Maunder

super26-Oct-15 0:08

26-Oct-15 0:08

Code Personal Assistant: Siri, Cortana, Google Now: The Future of coding[^]

I am not sure how this can be called as an article or tip? The images shown in the article should be properly referenced.

Edit--
And this is same article posted earlier

Older one[^]

cheers,

Super

------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it

Nelek26-Oct-15 0:56

Nelek

26-Oct-15 0:56

I don't like blogs because I don't know what to do with them Dead | X|

I would report 90% of them, I whish there were clear indications about blogs.

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Sean Ewington26-Oct-15 9:21

Sean Ewington

26-Oct-15 9:21

The only leeway blog entries have is that they are less exhaustive than CodeProject articles. If you are writing on your blog and you share it with us, it should come as close to a CodeProject article as reasonably possible, but I don't think we can expect everyone to be as exhaustive on their personal blog as we would on CodeProject.

It's a tricky line, I'm sure.

But if you think something doesn't look good, please vote for it, report it. I'll look at it and make a call.

Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject

Nelek26-Oct-15 10:56

Nelek

26-Oct-15 10:56

Sean Ewington wrote:
report it. I'll look at it and make a call.

you mean our flag in inaccurate?

M.D.V.

Sean Ewington26-Oct-15 11:42

Sean Ewington

26-Oct-15 11:42

You betcha, that would do! Or if you'd prefer, "Extremely poor quality"

Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject

Why two almost similar article

Nelek27-Oct-15 0:46

Nelek

27-Oct-15 0:46

I use "poor quality" when I am sure it is not worth and I think it should be out. Let's keep the "innacurate" one to flag it for you.

M.D.V.

super25-Oct-15 23:57

Re: Why two almost similar article

25-Oct-15 23:57

Latest[^]
Older[^]

I do not like the way this has been organized. It should be combined into one single article. Please verify and let me know if I am wrong.

cheers,

Super

------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it

Thanks787226-Oct-15 0:28