.NET (Core and Framework)

FirstPrevNext

Cannot Uninstall Visual Studio.Net garfild8-Jan-03 4:00 garfild 8-Jan-03 4:00  Hi, I have installed .NET Beta 2, version v.1.0.2914 on my computer. Trying to UnInstall the .Net raises an error "Setup cannot read/write to System Registry". I want to install an SDK framework and I need to uninstal first the above but cannot. Can you help me here? Thanks Re: Cannot Uninstall Visual Studio.Net Nick Parker8-Jan-03 4:17 Nick Parker 8-Jan-03 4:17  garfild wrote: I have installed .NET Beta 2, version v.1.0.2914 on my computer. Trying to UnInstall the .Net raises an error "Setup cannot read/write to System Registry". I want to install an SDK framework and I need to uninstal first the above but cannot. Can you help me here? We had a problem at work with either beta 1 or 2, I can't remember. It was just on a test machine so we wiped it clean and did the re-install. Nick Parker You see the Standards change. - Fellow co-worker CodeProject namespace charliedurrant7-Jan-03 6:41 charliedurrant 7-Jan-03 6:41  I have only been looking at the articles posted for .NET for a short time. There are some very usefull articles and complete components. Does anyone have any comments or thoughts on starting a CodeProject namespace and bringing together the code into one place? This would reduce the possible duplication and help developers using the code........ Am I barking up the wrong tree? Re: CodeProject namespace leppie7-Jan-03 7:10 leppie 7-Jan-03 7:10  charliedurrant wrote: Am I barking up the wrong tree? Heard about too many cooks spoils the broth? I think that would be the case. WebBoxes - Yet another collapsable control, but it relies on a "graphics server" for dynamic pretty rounded corners, cool arrows and unlimited font support. Re: CodeProject namespace charliedurrant7-Jan-03 7:49 charliedurrant 7-Jan-03 7:49  I take your point .......but from small beginnings......? Re: CodeProject namespace SimonS8-Jan-03 22:39 SimonS 8-Jan-03 22:39  That would be a cool idea if the code centered around one mega-application. What sought of examples are you thinking of, Charlie? namespace CodeProject.ArticleSection.ArticleShortName.Module ? Cheers, Simon "The day I swan around in expensive suits is the day I hope someone puts a bullet in my head.", Chris Carter. my svg article Re: CodeProject namespace charliedurrant9-Jan-03 12:30 charliedurrant 9-Jan-03 12:30  Simon, I was thinking along the lines of mimicking the .NET runtime structure, MS have done all the hard work so why not copy it..... CodeProject.System.Windows.Forms...... etc..... I was looking for balloon code and there are 2 good examples (Peter Rilling, Rama Kirshna). There is one aspect to the code project of learning and the other of simply reusing code directly. I spent some time looking at each and wondered why not have a general namespace \ project that people can contribute to so to prevent duplication. Each ballon article has benefits but consumers of the code are left pondering.... The 'code project' .NET area could easily be a definitive runtime available to all....... Your thoughts..? Charlie Re: CodeProject namespace leppie9-Jan-03 20:59 leppie 9-Jan-03 20:59  At the end of the day you will have to distribute an assembly of (say) 20mb with your app, not to mention mostly useless (in a production enviroment) code classes. OTOH, a best of the best assembly could be nice, but who will decide what goes and what goes to the bit bucket? WebBoxes - Yet another collapsable control, but it relies on a "graphics server" for dynamic pretty rounded corners, cool arrows and unlimited font support. Re: CodeProject namespace charliedurrant9-Jan-03 23:07 charliedurrant 9-Jan-03 23:07  Definately the 'best of the best', thats my point exactly..... A small community of Platinum / Golds members or maybe the editor could suggest a number of people to 'decide what would go in or not......'. The code project site could have a dedicated area for managing the framework. The changes to the actual library would get votes / ammendments by the people above and a quorum number would allow the code to become part of the library. I don't know how other opensource projects work? Do you? Charlie Re: CodeProject namespace leppie10-Jan-03 0:51 leppie 10-Jan-03 0:51  All this is nice, but it would eventually require some one to control this. A repository will need to be setup...and dont even wanna go further as it already sounds like too much work charliedurrant wrote: I don't know how other opensource projects work? Do you? No, not really... My idea is to create a unique CP product and invite users to work on it from the ground up following guidelines and design rules specified. Once the product start making millions, those involved will get "kickbacks" after expenses. WebBoxes - Yet another collapsable control, but it relies on a "graphics server" for dynamic pretty rounded corners, cool arrows and unlimited font support. Re: CodeProject namespace charliedurrant10-Jan-03 4:15 charliedurrant 10-Jan-03 4:15  The repository wouldn't be too bad. A simple start would be a discussion thread: 'CodeProject Framework' and and an article containing the code. I'd put myself forward to manage the code side. Ofcourse having a namespace could mean that separate zones, ie strings, controls could be managed by different people. Code management is an arse but the benefits are great.... As to your other point, is there sarcasm present? I take you point though....There is one aspect to developing a public library.....lots of qudos when applying for jobs. If an applicant had that on his CV then it would almost guarentee him a job. Creating a project would achieve the same thing as a library would evolve from that. 1) The application itslef. 2) A library of generic functions. But what to do....? Charlie Re: CodeProject namespace leppie10-Jan-03 6:22 leppie 10-Jan-03 6:22  OK futher thinking has got my thinking of an "better" (less management) idea. For gold/silver members (as well as editor submitted) articles has the option to go into a CVS repository. These "articles" will be then mapped to a CP/Division/Subdivision namespace. Each nite the complete namespace will be compiled available as a single download (maybe divisioned assemblies?), also using CVSview like sourceforge, code must be viewable from the web. charliedurrant wrote: As to your other point, is there sarcasm present? Nope but I doubt something like that would ever happen...people can dissappear to quickly . WebBoxes - Yet another collapsable control, but it relies on a "graphics server" for dynamic pretty rounded corners, cool arrows and unlimited font support. Re: CodeProject namespace charliedurrant10-Jan-03 7:09 charliedurrant 10-Jan-03 7:09  Yes....I know little of sourceforge, having literally just looked at it its seems the right thing to use..... So who do we talk to about the possibility of taking this further? Charlie Re: CodeProject namespace leppie10-Jan-03 7:10 leppie 10-Jan-03 7:10  charliedurrant wrote: So who do we talk to about the possibility of taking this further? I think thats best to discuss with ze wepmaster and ze editors. WebBoxes - Yet another collapsable control, but it relies on a "graphics server" for dynamic pretty rounded corners, cool arrows and unlimited font support. How can build an exe file by VS .NET to execute it on Windows_98? Behzad Ebrahimi7-Jan-03 0:16 Behzad Ebrahimi 7-Jan-03 0:16  Hello everyone. How can build an exe file by VS .NET to execute it on Windows_98? Thank you Re: How can build an exe file by VS .NET to execute it on Windows_98? Stephane Rodriguez.7-Jan-03 0:57 Stephane Rodriguez. 7-Jan-03 0:57  Please avoid to use VS.NET. It encompasses more than one compiler, and what you need to run an app differs a lot. Tell us what compiler you've used instead : VC7, VCMC++, VC#, ... If you've made an app using the .NET run-time, then you've got to distribute this[^] as well. Re: How can build an exe file by VS .NET to execute it on Windows_98? flipdoubt7-Jan-03 3:53 flipdoubt 7-Jan-03 3:53  I think what .S.Rod is saying is that your .NET app will run on Windows98 as long as it has the .NET framework installed on it. If it doesn't, then you have to include/install the redistributable framework, to which .S.Rod provides a link, in order to run your app. You would be able to run Java apps without the Java runtime. .NET's CLR (Common Language Runtime) is quite similar. hey. what? I didn't mean to say Java. Ouch, sorry. I won't do it again. Re: How can build an exe file by VS .NET to execute it on Windows_98? Stephane Rodriguez.7-Jan-03 4:26 Stephane Rodriguez. 7-Jan-03 4:26  flipdoubt wrote: your .NET app will run on Windows98 as long as it has the .NET framework installed on it Yes, .NET apps run on Windows 98 provided the .NET run-time is installed. There are limitations however : for instance, ASP.NET apps require IIS. Unfortunately, you can't install IIS on Windows 98. And it's not likely ASP.NET apps are able to run on PWS either, the light version of IIS tailored for Windows 98. Re: How can build an exe file by VS .NET to execute it on Windows_98? flipdoubt7-Jan-03 4:59 flipdoubt 7-Jan-03 4:59  Would ASP not .NET have run on PWS? Either way, let's not quibble. Re: How can build an exe file by VS .NET to execute it on Windows_98? Nick Parker8-Jan-03 4:15 Nick Parker 8-Jan-03 4:15  flipdoubt wrote: Would ASP not .NET have run on PWS? Either way, let's not quibble. On Win98, regular ASP 3.0 will run under PWS, however ASP.NET applications will need to be running under IIS. Nick Parker You see the Standards change. - Fellow co-worker can setup project backup old file before copy it. chokchai6-Jan-03 18:03 chokchai 6-Jan-03 18:03  I create a setup project. and it copy some file to the folder. if the file exist, I would like to backup it. and will copy it back when uninstall. how to do it? thank you very much chokchai chalermwattanatrai Comprehensive list of Attributes build into .Net flipdoubt6-Jan-03 1:53 flipdoubt 6-Jan-03 1:53  Can anybody point me to a comprehensive list of all the Attributes build into the .NET Framework? Can anybody suggest a way that I can search the MSDN documentation for a comments on all the Attributes? Because they are spread across so many namespaces, I find it difficult to get a good sense for all the Attributes out there. It's like you have to go at them from the context in which you're going to use them. I've read many articles on C# control design (here at CodeProject and elsewhere) that give me a glimpse of the properties that affect an object when viewed in the PropertyGrid, but that is just one small sub-set of the "built-in custom attributes". What gives? Re: Comprehensive list of Attributes build into .Net Stephane Rodriguez.6-Jan-03 2:35 Stephane Rodriguez. 6-Jan-03 2:35  Default .NET attributes are in fact classes whose name is of the form ___Attribute. For instance [DllImport(...)] is managed by the DllImportAttribute class, in the System.Runtime.InteropServices namespace. I am not aware of a flat listing of those attributes. However, you can use the * wildcard in MSDN to find all *Attribute classes. Re: Comprehensive list of Attributes build into .Net flipdoubt6-Jan-03 12:05 flipdoubt 6-Jan-03 12:05  Local MSDN: ms-help://MS.VSCC/MS.MSDNVS/cpref/html/frlrfsystemattributeclasshierarchy.htm MS MSDN: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/cpref/html/frlrfsystemattributeclasshierarchy.asp?frame=true Re: Comprehensive list of Attributes build into .Net Stephane Rodriguez.7-Jan-03 2:59 Stephane Rodriguez. 7-Jan-03 2:59  Thanks. Don't forget clickety police[^] !

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00     Last Update: 29-Apr-24 13:07 Refresh ᐊ Prev1...1184118511861187118811891190119111921193 Next ᐅ

General    News    Suggestion    Question    Bug    Answer    Joke    Praise    Rant    Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.