|
|
is there any managed code for it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everyone,
Im trying to create a Container Control, which has selfdrawn borders and a few buttons to do something with it. I would like that my Control behaves professional, like a Windows.Forms.Control.
But now comes my Problem:
All I want to achieve is that no SubControl which I add to my Control can overlay the Control's borders.
I've tried to redirect the ControlCollection with my own inherited ControlCollection to an inner Panel wich then would have exact the ClientSize i want. - That works fine as long as you are not working with the Visual-Studio Designer else it throws NullReferenceExceptions or IndexOutOfRangeExceptions(Because the Control's Collection doesnt contain the inner Panel).
So now my next thought was to manipulate the ClientSize. A Form has a smaller ClientSize according to its Size then a Control because of its Border. So what if someone like me, wants his Control to have a different Border then the usual "FixedSingle,Fixed3d and None" then he must have to manipulate the CLientSize according to his Control's Border.
Ok unfortunatly Im not able to achieve this because when I resize the CLientSize also the Size Property changes and vise versa.
Hope someone has an idea how I could break this behavior.
Thanks in advance and sorry for my spelling mistakes.
XXX
|
|
|
|
|
I can't insert breakpoints with F9 anymore in Visual Studio. Any tip what can be wrong? (I can use F5 to rum my program so it is not the F-lock button that is dissabled)
_____________________________
...and justice for all
APe
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
I am using Visual Studio 2005 to develop a C# COM Class Library project. There is a setting in Build --> Output, called *Register for COM Interop*. What is the usage of this setting? In my situation, do I need to set this option?
thanks in advance,
George
|
|
|
|
|
Indicates that your managed application will expose a COM object (a COM callable wrapper) that allows a COM object to interact with your managed application. The Output type property in the Application page of the Project Designer for this application must be set to Class Library in order for the Register for COM interop property to be available. For an example class that you might include in your Visual C# application and expose as a COM object, see Example COM Class (C# Programming Guide).
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
namespace project_name
{
[Guid("EAA4976A-45C3-4BC5-BC0B-E474F4C3C83F")]
public interface ComClass1Interface
{
}
[Guid("7BD20046-DF8C-44A6-8F6B-687FAA26FA71"),
InterfaceType(ComInterfaceType.InterfaceIsIDispatch)]
public interface ComClass1Events
{
}
[Guid("0D53A3E8-E51A-49C7-944E-E72A2064F938"),
ClassInterface(ClassInterfaceType.None),
ComSourceInterfaces(typeof(ComClass1Events))]
public class ComClass1 : ComClass1Interface
{
}
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Yanshof,
I am wondering what detailed operations is Visual Studio 2005 doing if this option is selected in your sample.
I am wondering what is the differences between using this Visual Studio 2005 option and do the following work by myself,
1. regasm /codebase <assembly name="">;
2. regasm /tlb <assembly name="">.
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
George_George wrote: Register for COM Interop
It would, I guess, automatically create necessary type libraries and called regsvr32 also for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Vasudevan,
For C# managed COM, it should be mscoree.dll other than regsvr32 which is acting as the host for all COM components, right?
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
Hello
This is the code of save data in the SQLDataBase:
con.Open();
str3 = "INSERT INTO [CreditCard].[dbo].[CreditCardInfo] ([CreditTypeID],[CreditcardNumber],[Name],[BankID],[ExpiryDate],[EntryDate],[MachineTypeID]) VALUES((" & crId & "),(" & crNum & "),('" & Name & "'),(" & bnkId & "),('" & dtm & "'),('" & now & "'),(" & mId & "))";
cmd = new SqlCommand(str3, con);
adap.SelectCommand = cmd;
Thanks in advance
Assaf
|
|
|
|
|
hi Assaf :
what is the problem in this code?
Rami Abdalhalim
|
|
|
|
|
the problem is this line of the insert statment is always blue
the tool tip that appearis:
"operator '&' cannot be applied to operands of type 'string'and 'int'"
i don't what the problem and this not usually that i have this problem.
Thanks in advance
Assaf
|
|
|
|
|
A neater stored procedure would have been more easier to debug. Can you see the formed SQL statement in Quick Watch window in the Query Analyser? That should be easier to identify and isolate the malady.
|
|
|
|
|
The problem is not in the SQL statement. He's using the & operator from VB in C# code...
---
single minded; short sighted; long gone;
|
|
|
|
|
Yep. Alongside with that, the vulnerability might play havoc for him in the long run. Wouldn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, it definitely will.
But not as long as he can't even compiler the code. 
---
single minded; short sighted; long gone;
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: A neater stored procedure would have been more easier to debug
I agree. Just have the parameters be the fields that are being updated.
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
You can't use the & operator to concatenate strings in C#. Use the + operator.
---
single minded; short sighted; long gone;
|
|
|
|
|
I have the following function, but I am trying to have the application wait until the thread completes before it moves on but the application just appears to lock. can someone tell me what I might be doing wrong?
private void UploadTicketChnges(bool WaitForThreadToFinish)
{
TicketChanges TixChanges = new TicketChanges(mysql, mysqlcmd);
TixChanges.AppEventID = AppEventID;
TixChanges.AppMemberEmail = AppMemberEmail;
TixChanges.AppMemberPassword = AppMemberPassword;
TixChanges.configAPIURL = configAPIURL;
TixChanges.configDatabaseTable = configDatabaseTable;
new Thread(new ThreadStart(TixChanges.ProcessChanges)).Start();
if (WaitForThreadToFinish)
{
// wait for all the threads to finish
Thread.CurrentThread.Join();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Brad Wick wrote: Thread.CurrentThread.Join();
"Thread.Join() blocks the calling thread until a thread terminates."
 you want the current thread to wait until the current thread has finished
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
this weeks tips:
- make Visual display line numbers: Tools/Options/TextEditor/...
- show exceptions with ToString() to see all information
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
|
|
|
|
|
Yes I would like the main application that calls the thread to wait until its finished. I know this is not what threading is all about, but when I call the thread for the very first time I want it to wait until its completed. The other time's it is called is inside a timer which I don't care about it waiting until it's finished.
|
|
|
|
|
The only Join that makes sense is someOtherThread.Join() which makes the
current thread wait on someOtherThread.
As I said before
Thread.CurrentThread.Join() makes no sense, it makes the current<br />
thread wait until the current thread is finished, which is never since it is waiting...<br />
<br />
:) <br />
<br />
<div class="ForumSig">Luc Pattyn <a href="http://www.codeproject.com/scrapbook/ForumGuidelines.asp">[Forum Guidelines]</a> <a href="http://www.codeproject.com/script/articles/list_articles.asp?userid=648011">[My Articles]</a><br />
<br />
<hr>this weeks tips:<br />
- make Visual display line numbers: Tools/Options/TextEditor/...<br />
- show exceptions with ToString() to see all information<br />
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google<br />
<hr></div>
|
|
|
|
|
Thread processThread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(TixChanges.ProcessChanges));
processThread.Start();
if (WaitForThreadToFinish)
{
processThread.Join();
}
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
