|
When MS release .Net 3.0 and C# 3.0, will these be compatible with VS 2005, does anyone know? I've only just stumped up the cash for VS, and I'm looking forwards to having to stump up even more!
Cheers,
Utini.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 was not compatible with VS.NET, 2.0 is not compatible with 2003, I don't think 3.0 will be compatible with 2005  .
I've found a living worth working for, but I haven't found work worth living for.
<marquee>![Beer | [beer]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif)
![Jig | [Dance]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/jig.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
It currently is compatible with VS2005. Keep in mind that .NET 3.0 is just a marketing term. It really uses .NET 2.0 - but has tons of extra classes added in.
|
|
|
|
|
Josh Smith wrote: It really uses .NET 2.0
Kind of true. It uses the 2.0 CLR (unlike the .NET 1.1 to 2.0 transition, no CLR changes are required this time around). However, it does use a new .NET framework base class library that is superset of of what's currently available.
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit.
I'm currently blogging about: Goof around music jam with my brothers (with video)
The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul
Judah Himango
|
|
|
|
|
Do you know if MS is going to increment the assembly versions from 2.0 to 3.0? I certainly hope so, otherwise it will be very confusing.
Josh
|
|
|
|
|
|
But you'll still be able to use it from VS 2005. That's the point, albeit with add-ins or whatever.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Can we be so sure though? There's already a C# 3.0 spec out there with all of the LINQ stuff integrated. Wouldn't it make sense to put C# 3.0 into .Net 3.0?
Logifusion[^]
|
|
|
|
|
C# 3 will be released post-.NET 3. This has been stated several times by the Microsoft folks. .NET 3 will be released with Vista (i.e., in a few months). C# 3 and VB9 will ship with Visual Studio codename Orcas, which will be released some time after Vista is released.
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit.
I'm currently blogging about: Goof around music jam with my brothers (with video)
The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul
Judah Himango
|
|
|
|
|
Damn. I was hoping to get my hands on that ObjectSpaces stuff and LINQ.
Logifusion[^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, names change all the time. Now it's the object services, which is part of the ADO.NET entity framework. Means basically the same thing to me though: an ORM that's built into the framework instead of as a 3rd party tool.
Logifusion[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Is that right? I know you can use the ".NET 3" beta with the WinFX/.NET 3 extensions for VS2005, but I wasn't sure if they'd still allow that for 2005 or if they'd induce us to upgrade. It would be nice if the release schedule of .NET 3 wasn't tied to a VS release, which usually is delayed.
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit.
I'm currently blogging about: Goof around music jam with my brothers (with video)
The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul
Judah Himango
|
|
|
|
|
Considering how long it took for VS2005 to hit the market, I would be shocked to death if MS somehow was able to pull VS2006 out of their arse by the time Vista is officially released. This leads me to believe that .NET 3.0 will run in VS2005.
josh
|
|
|
|
|
|
hi,
i want to check a table whether it contains a particular column or not if it does't contain it than it should be added to the table, all thing should be done through Stored procedure and the name of TABLE and COLUMN must be passed as arguments or parameters to the procedure......
Please help if u can
thanks allot
Software Developer
ASP.Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executing stored procedure
sp_help tablename
gives information about specified table. Hope this may also help you.
Best Regards
_____________________________
Success is not something to wait for, its something to work for.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I don't want to allow cut, copy, and paste in the text box. For this what should i do. Any suggestion or anybody know about concerning article, then please! let me to know.
Thanks.
_____________________________
Success is not something to wait for, its something to work for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Vasudevan Deepak Kumar.
I always forget to mention my working environment (thats my fault ). I'm currently working with windows forms.
Well Thanks for reply &
Best regards.
_____________________________
Success is not something to wait for, its something to work for.
|
|
|
|
|
1. Create a new empty context menu for the textbox (so right-clicking gives the user nothing)
2. Deal with KeyPress/KeyDown event(s) - depending on whether they should be allowed to type
3. In the Exit/LostFocus event, clear the clipboard
... if someone is smart and they really want to copy the text, they'll figure out a way, but these steps should prevent most users from doing it
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Paul Brower
&
Best regards
_____________________________
Success is not something to wait for, its something to work for.
|
|
|
|
|
Set the ContextMenu property of the textbox as follows:
<textbox object="">.ContextMenu=new ContextMenu();
Now the ContextMenu for that textbox that contains Cut,Copy,Paste will not appear(Indeed no ContextMenu for that TextBox will appear). Consequently no one could cut,copy,paste. If you have defined any Shortcuts for your TextBox for cut,copy,paste, then set the EnableShortCuts property to false too.
Regards,
Wasif Ehsan.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
