Re: Exe Initialization - C / C++ / MFC Discussion Boards

002comp4-Nov-09 22:34

4-Nov-09 22:34

Hello Friends
I created a .exe and when I try to run that It shows a MessageBox that Displays

"The Application failed to initialize properly(0Xc0150002).Click on OK to terminate the application"

Any Ideas?????

Thanks
Yogesh

Re: Exe Initialization

Michael Schubert4-Nov-09 23:00

Michael Schubert

4-Nov-09 23:00

yogeshs wrote:
I created a .exe

How?

yogeshs wrote:
Any Ideas?????

Yes, click on OK to terminate the application.

Re: Exe Initialization

002comp4-Nov-09 23:51

002comp

4-Nov-09 23:51

very funny Thumbs Down | :thumbsdown:

Re: Exe Initialization

Covean4-Nov-09 23:11

Covean

4-Nov-09 23:11

Ever looked in your windows event log for this error?

Greetings
Covean

Re: Exe Initialization

Rajesh R Subramanian4-Nov-09 23:26

Rajesh R Subramanian

4-Nov-09 23:26

Use the debugger.

“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell

Re: Exe Initialization

Kushagra Tiwari4-Nov-09 23:34

Kushagra Tiwari

4-Nov-09 23:34

I am quiet sure that it must be an MFC executable and u need to have vc 2005 redistributable to execute it on your local machine.

u can download it here :
[]http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=32bc1bee-a3f9-4c13-9c99-220b62a191ee&displaylang=en[^]
If this helps mark this ans as good .

Cheers,
Kushagra

Re: Exe Initialization

002comp4-Nov-09 23:50

002comp

4-Nov-09 23:50

Thanks for your help but it is still showing that message Box.

Re: Exe Initialization

Kushagra Tiwari4-Nov-09 23:54

Kushagra Tiwari

4-Nov-09 23:54

Is it a normal exe or MFC ? can u detail more about what debugging techniques are yu using .. have u seen event viewer of your computer to see if an exception was thrown by ur aplication ??

Re: Exe Initialization

002comp5-Nov-09 0:13

002comp

5-Nov-09 0:13

Actually,we are using a third party exe.So I cant debug and nothing.I just want to run it on my machine and it is running there with third party.

Re: Exe Initialization

Kushagra Tiwari5-Nov-09 0:29

Kushagra Tiwari

5-Nov-09 0:29

Check ur file system and the filesystem n their machine normally this happens if there are filesystem differences FAT or NTFS . Or check with which Service pack they are running and what is you service pack of OS. also might be the case it requires Dotnet framework which you machhine doesnot have. Please see your event log and let me know cause of crash in your application .

Re: Exe Initialization

Michael Schubert5-Nov-09 5:34

Michael Schubert

5-Nov-09 5:34

yogeshs wrote:
Actually,we are using a third party exe

In your original post you said you created the .exe. Confused | :confused:

Re: Exe Initialization

Richard MacCutchan5-Nov-09 2:28

Richard MacCutchan

5-Nov-09 2:28

Did you look here[^]?

Re: Exe Initialization [modified]

2249175-Nov-09 10:35

224917

5-Nov-09 10:35

Did you try using depends.exe to see if all the required files are present in the machine you are trying to run this application?

modified on Thursday, July 8, 2010 11:58 PM

Re: Exe Initialization

002comp5-Nov-09 18:35

002comp

5-Nov-09 18:35

I tried that too but no success.

virtual member

khomeyni4-Nov-09 21:01

khomeyni

4-Nov-09 21:01

in the name of god
hello
i have asked for this question in this tread but yet i cant get my answer:
http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3250568/Re-inheritance.aspx[^]

indeed i want to use member virtualization .does c++ has something like virtual member?

valhamdolelah.

Re: virtual member

CPallini4-Nov-09 21:29

CPallini

4-Nov-09 21:29

Hi,

khomeyni wrote:
indeed i want to use member virtualization .does c++ has something like virtual member?

Virtualization (see, for instance [^]) has nothing to do with C++ virtual member functions.

And yes, using C++ language, you may define virtual member functions: surprisingly enough, you may find this info in the documentation [^] (and in every C++ book).

Smile | :)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.

This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke

[My articles]

Re: virtual member

khomeyni5-Nov-09 4:54

khomeyni

5-Nov-09 4:54

thanks
but i know that there is a virtual member function but i dont want function i want member virtualization as
virtual int x;
in a class ,please see the link that i said.
valhamdolelah.

Re: virtual member

CPallini5-Nov-09 6:58

CPallini

5-Nov-09 6:58

khomeyni wrote:
virtual int x;

You know, that make no sense.
Smile | :)

Comments needed: change from CSocket to raw socket

includeh104-Nov-09 19:25

includeh10

4-Nov-09 19:25

My TCP/IP (socket) has completed, but the client/server have some problem from CSocket, I may change from CSocket to raw win32 socket.

Before doing changes, I need your comments:

1. my develop OS is win2k, but MSDN says server functions (i.e. listen and accept) need OS-server to support, must I change my OS by OS-server for using server-functions?

2. Is it no good if I keep CSocket for server side and use raw socket for client side? - because server side has no problem.

Re: Comments needed: change from CSocket to raw socket

HimanshuJoshi4-Nov-09 20:03

HimanshuJoshi

4-Nov-09 20:03

includeh10 wrote:
1. my develop OS is win2k, but MSDN says server functions (i.e. listen and accept) need OS-server to support, must I change my OS by OS-server for using server-functions?

No. I have successfully used Winsock in Windows XP. Haven't used them in win2k though. But It should not be a problem.

includeh10 wrote:
2. Is it no good if I keep CSocket for server side and use raw socket for client side? - because server side has no problem.

If CSocket is badly designed as you said earlier, then remove it and use raw socket for both of them; it will be consistent too.

Re: Comments needed: change from CSocket to raw socket

CPallini4-Nov-09 21:22

CPallini

4-Nov-09 21:22

includeh10 wrote:

1. my develop OS is win2k, but MSDN says server functions (i.e. listen and accept) need OS-server to support, must I change my OS by OS-server for using server-functions?

I can't believe that. Where did you find it? I cannot find myself inside the page you linked.

includeh10 wrote:
2. Is it no good if I keep CSocket for server side and use raw socket for client side? - because server side has no problem.

No problems (of course) other than poor developer having to deal with two different APIs.
Smile | :)

Re: Comments needed: change from CSocket to raw socket

Richard MacCutchan4-Nov-09 23:01

Richard MacCutchan

4-Nov-09 23:01

includeh10 wrote:
1. my develop OS is win2k, but MSDN says server functions (i.e. listen and accept) need OS-server to support, must I change my OS by OS-server for using server-functions?

I think you misread something, this has never been a requirement. If it was then most Windows PCs would not work.

includeh10 wrote:
2. Is it no good if I keep CSocket for server side and use raw socket for client side? - because server side has no problem.

CSocket is just an MFC wrapper around raw sockets, It is much more likely that there is a bug in your code rather than something wrong with CSocket.

Re: Comments needed: change from CSocket to raw socket

Moak5-Nov-09 3:15

Moak

5-Nov-09 3:15

So MFC's CSocket caused problems in your code and you want to go to raw sockets. Why? Wouldn't it be quicker to fix your code or use one of the many existing wrapper classes. There are blocking and event based socket classes out there, in alphabetical order:

* Alhem
* Boost
* SharkEngine
* QT
* and many others...

It seems to be a C++ world stigma... instead of putting development effort into low-level coding, how about using a stable, documented library and improve the application with the extra time? I think it is not trivial to write a stable, flexible, efficient networking core. Perhaps you require at a later point HTTP proxy support, session handling, encryption or something else that a library would already provide. To be honest, other languages like Java or Python offer a better collection of reusable functionality, but at least for networking there are some good choices for C++ too.

Hope it helps! Smile | :)

Webchat in Europe Java | [Coffee]

(only 4K)

How to set maximum length for EditControl (textBox)

AliceYeap4-Nov-09 15:32

AliceYeap

4-Nov-09 15:32

Hi all,

I now using Visual C++ (Visual Studio 2005) for my project. i face some problem in set the maximum length for my edit control(text box).

i have 3 edit control in the same dialog. i want set the maximum length for each edit control = 5.

following are the 3 ID of edit control in same dialog:
IDC_EDIT_MCNO
IDC_EDIT_MCSERIALNO
IDC_EDIT_LOCATION

The dialog ID is: IDD_MACHINE

Please guide me for set max length.

Thanks very for your help. i will very appreciate. Smile | :)

Regards:
Alice Smile | :)

Re: How to set maximum length for EditControl (textBox)

«_Superman_»4-Nov-09 15:50

«_Superman_»

4-Nov-09 15:50

What do you mean by maximum length of edit control?
Is it the number of characters or the width of the edit control?

«_Superman_»
I love work. It gives me something to do between weekends.

Microsoft MVP (Visual C++)

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.