|
Hamid. wrote: Does it[^] helpful?
Should be "Is it Helpful"...
anyway, happy new year Hamid, and congratulations for your new status 
|
|
|
|
|
You grammar-nazi...
Happy new year tox! 
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
CPallini wrote: You grammar-nazi
no insults please 
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks where are you old friend? and congratulations for your mvp again.
Of one Essence is the human race
thus has Creation put the base
One Limb impacted is sufficient
For all Others to feel the Mace
(Saadi )
|
|
|
|
|
Hamid. wrote: where are you
under my own work... no time anymore to roam on CP baords that much
|
|
|
|
|
Hamid. wrote: Thanks where are you old friend?
Tox deserted: you may find him togheter with the enemy, in the java forum... 
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Of one Essence is the human race
thus has Creation put the base
One Limb impacted is sufficient
For all Others to feel the Mace
(Saadi )
|
|
|
|
|
CPallini wrote: Tox deserted
I didn't I just don't have much time, and quite tired answering to google it or to look into an FAQ.
CPallini wrote: with the enemy, in the java forum
Java is not enemy not much than C# at least, so you'd better revise your judgement and spit at VB scripters instead.
|
|
|
|
|
toxcct wrote: Java is not enemy not much than C# at least
Java *is* the (MS) enemy, C# was invented to fight Java. (fighting VB scripters is like bombing the Red Cross).
BTW: Did you notice the joke icon?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
CPallini wrote: Did you notice the joke icon?
anyway :
CPallini wrote: Java *is* the (MS) enemy
crap. everything is Ms enemy, but MS is not god, and it's not them to dictate to programers what language is best. I just want them to be a software producer, to produce good, not bugged things, and then people will nicely come to them. but that's definitely not the case currently. Java is a damn good language, but MS could not stand to have a free, well appreciated language aver the world and over the web, so they though they had to (once again) create their own version of something already existing...
CPallini wrote: fighting VB scripters is like bombing the Red Cross
you're rude. everybody knows what VB is, so please don't compare them to Red Cross, which is way more respectable than MS
|
|
|
|
|
toxcct wrote: crap. everything is Ms enemy, but MS is not god
Crap.
Not all is MS enemy and MS is not that bad.
Java was a true MS enemy, and the MS's counter-attack produced .NET (that's IMHO damned good).
toxcct wrote: and it's not them to dictate to programers what language is best
Unfortunately they try to do that.
toxcct wrote: I just want them to be a software producer, to produce good, not bugged things, and then people will nicely come to them. but that's definitely not the case currently. Java is a damn good language
Nothing to say: Your are free to use the language you like the most and Java is (IMHO) indeed a very good language. I called Java 'the enemy' while it is by no means our enemy (the joke icon...).
toxcct wrote: Java is a damn good language, but MS could not stand to have a free, well appreciated language aver the world and over the web, so they though they had to (once again) create their own version of something already existing...
They I've learned from the 'Java experience': there are free version of Visual Studio, CLI (and C#) are ECMA standards,...
IMHO the .NET platform is quite similar though better than the Java one. But that's natural, Java was a rather pioneer experience.
toxcct wrote: you're rude. everybody knows what VB is, so please don't compare them to Red Cross, which is way more respectable than MS
Something personal with MS (I was actually joking also about VBScript, in fact I like it...)?
BTW: welcome in the THHB [^], toxcct !
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
modified on Thursday, January 8, 2009 11:52 AM
|
|
|
|
|
CPallini wrote: Java was a true MS enemy
well, because they wanted to. By making people think Java was the enemy, they would naturally come to .NET, which is the obvious antagonist of Java. but Java never attempted to make some dark over Microsoft. Java is Cross Plateform, which .NET is definitely not, and Sun have another niche than MS, so they don't really disturb each other.
What I hate in this is earing all that idiot programmers spitting that Java is Crap, and .NET is way better, but who never put their hands into a java code for once. Microsoft is the only culprit in this way of thinking which is hateful.
.NET is sure a good product, but I'd never say it is best for anything. it has good advantages over Java, such like Java has many other good advantages over .NET too !
CPallini wrote: Unfortunately they try to do that
disgraceful
CPallini wrote: I called Java 'the enemy' while it is by no means our enemy
None is MY enemy. I use all, depending on my needs.
CPallini wrote: IMHO the .NET platform is quite similar though better than the Java one. But that's natural, Java was a rather pioneer experience
Hey, Java is not a dinosaur. it's still being improved, so I repeat myself, saying .NET is better means nothing.
CPallini wrote: VBScript
that's totally different. I was talking about VB 6 and/or VB.NET.
CPallini wrote: BTW: welcome in the THHB [^], toxcct !
lol. nice 
|
|
|
|
|
Do you need help?toxcct is serious,are you ok?
Of one Essence is the human race
thus has Creation put the base
One Limb impacted is sufficient
For all Others to feel the Mace
(Saadi )
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately you cannot help me: it's a duel!
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
With gun or sword?
Pallini you are in our heart.
Of one Essence is the human race
thus has Creation put the base
One Limb impacted is sufficient
For all Others to feel the Mace
(Saadi )
|
|
|
|
|
Hamid. wrote: With gun or sword?
With sword, of course!
Hamid. wrote: Pallini you are in our heart.
Well: I should defend THHB's honour! Ooops, now tox is a THHB's member too!
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, pal. BTW: nice Thread Hijacking today!
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Configuration is:Debug Win 32
Building the project in this mode gives 0 errors , 0 warnings.
But when I execute the project it shows a MessageBox -Debug Assertion failed.
Program :\da\Debug\da.exe
File: f:\dd\vctools\vc7libs\ship\atlmfc\src\mfc\viewform.cpp
On clicking the Retry button of the MessageBox it reads- da.exe triggered a breakpoint.
on clicking Break button control goes to the file viewform.cpp file which show a breakpoint on the following statements.
#ifdef _DEBUG
// dialog template must exist and be invisible with WS_CHILD set
if (!_AfxCheckDialogTemplate(m_lpszTemplateName, TRUE))
{
ASSERT(FALSE); // invalid dialog template name
PostNcDestroy(); // cleanup if Create fails too soon
return FALSE;
}
#endif //_DEBUG
Can anyone please help me find a solution to the above mentioned problem.
Thanks and Regards
Divya.
|
|
|
|
|
Divya Lalwani wrote: // dialog template must exist and be invisible with WS_CHILD set
Did you check whether your dialog has invisible and child style set?
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a million...it worked...dialog visible property was set to true..
|
|
|
|
|
i have one s/w called Quick Designer(QD).i installed it in my system.it is executing successfully.but the problem is i have code for entire QD.by using this code i produced .exe files when i run these files they are not giving valid output.the same .exe when i copied in installed path it is executing successfullyis please help me inthis regard ...iam trying to solve it from last three days........().......
kir_MFC
modified on Thursday, January 8, 2009 1:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|
May be because, the exe uses some dll's, that the is local available in the installed folder. So if you set the working directory in the project settings( project settings->debug->Working directory), i think this problem will be solved.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi....
I have a problem while accessing the registry of another system connected in same network.
I work on a windows XP professional machine.I have to access a key in the registry of the other machine.When i use the function 'RegConnectRegistryA ', it gives an error 'The system could not find the environment option that you entered'.I'm not able to understand what the problem is.
Please do help me out.
Thnx in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
I can think of a few reasons why this wouldn't work.
There are no "try with this user/password" combination, so it will be using the current user. Do you have sufficient rights on the other machine?
You can use LogonUser/ImpersonateLoggedOnUser to change the user you're using - but it's not for the faint hearted.
Also from the documentation:
Windows XP Pro: If the computer is joined to a workgroup and the "Force network logons using local accounts to authenticate as Guest" policy is enabled, the function fails. Note that this policy is enabled by default for a computer running Windows XP Professional that is joined to a workgroup.
Lastly, is the machine name valid? You may also be able to use an IP address rather than a name (ie, "\\192,168.0.99"), in which case, can you ping it? Did you remember the \\ in front of the name?
Good luck,
Iain.
Codeproject MVP for C++, I can't believe it's for my lounge posts...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
