|
I know with subclassed but you said
"you cannot change the white color of an edit control" 
|
|
|
|
|
It was completely in context with the question that was asked. It is silly to subclass an edit control and handle events and paint, just to display some colored text with background. And of course you will need to subclass to do such stuff. As you subclass it, it is no more the normal edit control. In that article I could see that certain events are not handled properly. For an instance, you cannot paste in the second edit control of that dialogbox. These are all the pitfalls of subclassing, about which we need to be extra careful.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
ப்ரம்மா
|
|
|
|
|
hey everyone,
Thanks far all the reply. I've manage to do it by using the static text and from reading the articles from this website for examples.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
i think this site will help you alot www.flounder.com, download option will be there and click the option there win32progming will be appeared, download the al;l the code to your pc.
Chinna
|
|
|
|
|
this site will help you alot in win32 programing
http://www.flounder.com/download.htm#Complete%20Win32%20CD%20Contents
click Complete Win32 CD Contents
Chinna
|
|
|
|
|
launcher.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "public: __thiscall tLgInteger<class std::vector<unsigned long,class std::allocator<unsigned long> >,unsigned __int64>::tLgInteger<class std::vector<unsigned long,class std::allocator<unsigned long> >,unsigned __int64>(unsigned long)" (??0?$tLgInteger@V?$vector@KV?$allocator@K@std@@@std@@_K@@QAE@K@Z)
hint_54
|
|
|
|
|
hint_54 wrote: launcher.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "public: __thiscall tLgInteger<class std::vector<unsigned="" long,class="" std::allocator<unsigned="" long=""> >,unsigned __int64>::tLgInteger<class std::vector<unsigned="" long,class="" std::allocator<unsigned="" long=""> >,unsigned __int64>(unsigned long)" (??0?$tLgInteger@V?$vector@KV?$allocator@K@std@@@std@@_K@@QAE@K@Z)
huuuu 
where is the question ?
|
|
|
|
|
No question just found that funny 
hint_54
|
|
|
|
|
i may be missing something there, but, what's funny in this ?
|
|
|
|
|
This was the line that produced that error
tLgInteger<tVector, tOC>::tLgInteger( tElement nValue )
So it's just like CPallini said: "No more alcohol to the linker!"
hint_54
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but tLgInteger is a template as is tVector. All these template parameters have to be encoded into the typename. Ignoring the long typename (it is of no consequence anyway) the error is simple: the constructor is declared but not defined.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting 
Btw.. My 1 too.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
ப்ரம்மா
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mine?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I'm having a problem using accelerators in VC++.
My accelerators (defined in the Accelerator Table in my resource file, loaded up using LoadAccelerators and run using TranslateAccelerator)) work fine in the main application window, but I can't seem to get them to work in the child windows of my application. If the focus is on the main window the accelerators will work, but once the focus falls into a child window, accelerators no longer function. I only need the accelerators to work in a single child window (a listbox, to be exact), and I don't need them in the main application window.
Thanks!
KR
|
|
|
|
|
okey dokey.
I have 2 classes:
class imageViewer{...};
class camData{...};
imageViewer has a function called funcA();
camData has a function called funcB();
I wanted to call funcA; in funcB();
i.e.:i've tried both:
<br />
#include "imageViewer.h"<br />
void camData::funcB()<br />
{<br />
..<br />
imageViewer::funcA();<br />
}<br />
I get this error:
error C2352: 'ImageViewer::showPicture' : illegal call of non-static member function
-AND-
<br />
#include "imageViewer.h"<br />
void camData::funcB()<br />
{<br />
..<br />
funcA();<br />
}<br />
I get this error:
error C3861: 'showPicture': identifier not found
could someone please tell me my idiotic mistake.....
thanks,
Kitty
Kitty5
|
|
|
|
|
Well, in order to call a function (non-static) from a class, you first need to have an instance of your class. So, doing something like that (suppose MyClass is a class that defines funcA):
MyClass A;<br />
A.funcA();
You cannot simply do
MyClass::funcA();
|
|
|
|
|
:Cedric,
thanks very much for your advice.
I knew it was something simple that I was missing...
thanks!
Kitty
Kitty5
|
|
|
|
|
kitty5 wrote: ..
imageViewer::funcA();
To make such call possible. finA() must be static function of class imageViewer.
|
|
|
|
|
What is the maximum number of entry points a Win32 dll can export? if no limitation, would too many entry points affect performance or cause any other issues?
Thanks in advance!
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
By entry points I assume you mean exported functions?
Ordinals are limited to WORD size (16-bit, unsigned) but I don't know if you can have an
unlimited number of exports by name.
Exporting by ordinal instead of name saves DLL size and linking to the DLL is faster. I suppose
the more functions that need to be linked to, the longer it will take to link.
I'm sure this helps very little
Mark
|
|
|
|
|
Hello!
I would like to capture video from a camera, but I just can't find information about it... I found some articles, but there are no explanations there...
Maybe anybody knows where can I find information about it?
Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
|
I depends on the equipment you're using. If you're using a USB camera then you're halfway there.
The two biggie webcam manufacturers provide SDKs for their cameras; but, one involves signing an NDA.
The other is freely available. (But, of course, I forget who at the moment.)
Other cameras (analog) would require digitizers, which, I imagine, would be rather expensive. Compound that with whether an SDK is available.
Then of course, IP camera's are a whole other beast.
|
|
|
|
|
What about DirectX? Does it give me any tools?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
