|
Hi Everyone,
I am having problem while trying to deploy a windows app on a client's machine. I have developed the app in VS 2005 vb.net. I am able to install the app on the development pc but when installing it on the client machine it gives me MS general error: System.InvalidOperationException and gives me an option to send the message to MS of not. The client machine has framework 2.0 installed. Can it be the windows XP causing this problem? I would be really grateful if anyone can help me.
Vin
What goes around come around
|
|
|
|
|
I would recommend you to post this on the VB.NET forum - this one is for non-.NET C++ 
Windows Calculator told me I will die at 28. 
|
|
|
|
|
[Actually, never mind. I think the behavior I'm seeing matches the comment about printf in a child process behaving poorly due to buffering of output. The output does appear, just not immediately, presumably because it's being buffered.]
I want to create a child process (cmd.exe) that runs a batch file that will run for days or weeks or months and capture the stdout and stderr concurrently as it is happening. Do you know how I can do that?
I tried altering the example in http://support.microsoft.com/kb/190351 to use cmd.exe instead of client.exe, thinking I might be able to use separate threads for reading stdout and stderr. What I get seems to be the output from the batch file itself, but not from child processes of the batch file...
With a couple of examples I saw on this web page, they end up reading stderr first and then stdout afterwards, eventhough the code appears to be combining the stdout and stderr. I can't have that behavior, because the batch file could print output constantly to stdout and then once every 12 hours or so print something to stderr. I need to capture both stdout and stderr immediately as they are being written to.
-- modified at 13:27 Friday 27th October, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
I ve just started writing a little c file for webcam capture; all suggestions i got imply using 'ICaptureGraphBuilder2' interface, but visual studio comp. cant't recognize it;
should not it be in strmif.h, that is included through DShow.h?
Also i get funny compiling errors as 'SetFileName' is not a member of 'IFileSinkFilter'...when actually the auto-complete func itself prompts it among suggested methods of my pointer! 
Using: visual studio 6.0 in windows xpHE and newest PSDK; going to fire off SP2 because improved nothing;
i linked in project settings to Quartz, strmbase and strmiids libs; i tried cut off default includes and/or incremental link but nothing changed...
please, tell me not i must use these interfaces only in a cpp env, i have to avoid it
Surely i forgot some simple, stupid thing...what?
Thanks guys ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
You've added a path to the platform sdk include folder to your VC settings?
|
|
|
|
|
yes. Include and subfolders. Without it vc complains about ALL dshow classes/methods, now only for some 
Perhaps i need some newer .lib/.dll in system paths?
(installing SP2 didn't help  )
I like this new way of learning TaiChi...
|
|
|
|
|
Talemin wrote: Perhaps i need some newer .lib/.dll in system paths?
That's what I was thinking. The libs won't help compile errors though, only link errors.
With VC 6.0 I'm pretty sure you'll need to point to the new stuff.
Maybe make sure include/library paths for latest sdk are ahead of the default paths in the
VS settings.
Can you post all the #include lines you are using, in order, including any in a stdafx.h pre-
compiled header file?
Mark
|
|
|
|
|
I am NOT using stdafx...i am bound to rely strictly on a void project/simplest c enviroment - for now at least.
I included:
#include "DShow.h"
#include "WinBase.h"
no redefinition errors showing up with this order;
DShow includes uuids, windows, ole[s] and a lot of 'standard' requested libs...all as <xxx> namespaces 
I am starting to fear having to use all this stuff in a cpp env...or I shall ask my prof for vc2005 
Nonetheless, put sdk paths ahead of others could do some good, thanks!
--edit---
I just found a ICaptureGraphBuilder2 def in an 'axextend.idl' file in sdk\Include! But I cannot use it as it is...
what are idl files?
thanks Mark and excuse me for pseudo-english 
|
|
|
|
|
what about
#ifndef WINVER // Allow use of features specific to Windows 95 and Windows NT 4 or later.
#define WINVER 0x0400 // Change this to the appropriate value to target Windows 98 and Windows 2000 or later.
#endif
#ifndef _WIN32_WINNT // Allow use of features specific to Windows NT 4 or later.
#define _WIN32_WINNT 0x0400 // Change this to the appropriate value to target Windows 98 and Windows 2000 or later.
#endif
#ifndef _WIN32_WINDOWS // Allow use of features specific to Windows 98 or later.
#define _WIN32_WINDOWS 0x0410 // Change this to the appropriate value to target Windows Me or later.
#endif
#ifndef _WIN32_IE // Allow use of features specific to IE 4.0 or later.
#define _WIN32_IE 0x0400 // Change this to the appropriate value to target IE 5.0 or later.
#endif
#include <DShow.h>
(winbase.h is pulled in through dshow.h)
|
|
|
|
|
sorry copy/pasted...you can use it simpler like this...
#define WINVER 0x0400 // Change this to the appropriate value to target Windows 98 and Windows 2000 or later.
#define _WIN32_WINNT 0x0400 // Change this to the appropriate value to target Windows 98 and Windows 2000 or later.
#define _WIN32_WINDOWS 0x0410 // Change this to the appropriate value to target Windows Me or later.
#define _WIN32_IE 0x0400 // Change this to the appropriate value to target IE 5.0 or later.
#include <DShow.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Talemin wrote: Well, i'd just found a mini-very-tiny-little line in sdk page so that new (2003->) sdks don't support visual studio 6.0 more. So much for microsoft compatibility
Bummer!!
You'll be happy you upgraded though. I'm still on VC++ .NET 2003, I admit, but it's far better.
Best of luck!
Mark
|
|
|
|
|
OK. VS2005 accepts new classes. I still get the 'funny' errors
(a is not a member of b, but auto-complete func prompts a in &b-> members list...) but they seem only a problem with old vs6 project file conversion.
I hope 
Tip
you all will know this already, but for completeness'sake:
VS2005 provides no more ddraw libraries, which dshow still requires; you must install directx sdk too.
I like this new way of learning TaiChi...
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone!
I have this:
CEdit *m_em_errorMsg = (CEdit *) GetDlgItem(IDC_ERROR_MSG);
Is that a correct form of initialization? I don't want to use Create() because I'm using the dialog designer...
That code's giving me some errors, and the debugger's Watch 1 window has a lot of class (CEdit/CWnd) members with "expression cannot be evaluated" errors on them, so that's why I'm assuming the init is the problem... Is it wrong? Thanks! 
Windows Calculator told me I will die at 28. 
|
|
|
|
|
Lord Kixdemp wrote: Is that a correct form of initialization?
Yes, for initializing m_em_errorMsg.
Lord Kixdemp wrote: I don't want to use Create()...
Why would you need to? You should already have a control with an id of IDC_ERROR_MSG.
Lord Kixdemp wrote: That code's giving me some errors...
And those errors would be what?
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can declare a variable for your editbox and use of it
|
|
|
|
|
That be what I'm doing 
Windows Calculator told me I will die at 28.
|
|
|
|
|
if you declare a variable for your editbox that you have on forum is better than use
<br />
CEdit *m_em_errorMsg = (CEdit *) GetDlgItem(IDC_ERROR_MSG);
|
|
|
|
|
Dong-Jun Kim wrote: Is it normal behavior of modeless dialog boxes?
"Normal" is whatever you make of it.
Dong-Jun Kim wrote: I just want to close the box when I click close, little x button on top right, button.
Then you simply need to call DestroyWindow() in those situations. Be careful that you are not inadvertently calling EndDialog().
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
I have a worker thread that needs to wait a certain amount of miliseconds before resuming..
I would just got the for(i=0; i<10000000000; i++) route, but i'm afaid it will eat up the CPU. I'm trying to stay out of a loop but stay in the worker thread.
I need my main thread to be very alert and time accurate while this worker thread is waiting.
I've looked at all the timer functions.. can't seem to find the one to do the trick..
any ideas.. ?
Workthread()
{
//do some processing
//wait
//do more processing
//return
}
|
|
|
|
|
Sleep[^]
Although why someone is writing multi-threaded code prior to learning the threading API's is... well .... pretty crazy.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
On Windows, try Sleep(milliseconds)
Eats NO CPU
|
|
|
|
|
HA! Beat you by the click of an eye.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Rose | [Rose]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
Thanks!