|
First you need a way of comparing s_items for equality based on the strDevice string:
struct DeviceIDsEqual : binary_function<s_item, s_item, bool>
{
bool operator()(const s_item& f, const s_item& s) const
{
return f.strDevice == s.strDevice;
}
}
We also need the vector sorted so we need to compare if one s_item is less the another based on the strDevice string.
struct DeviceIDsLess : binary_function<s_item, s_item, bool>
{
bool operator()(const s_item& f, const s_item& s) const
{
return f.strDevice < s.strDevice;
}
}
Now we first sort then eliminate duplicates:
typedef vector<s_item>::iterator VI;
sort(v_items.begin(), v_items.end(), DeviceIDsLess());
VI newEnd = unique(v_items.begin(), v_items.end(), DeviceIDsEqual());
m_items.erase(newEnd, v_items.end());
Of if you just want to find the duplicates you can use the adjacent_find algorithm.
This code needs the following includes:
<functional>
<algorithm>
and the following:
using namespace std;
Steve
-- modified at 23:48 Monday 6th February, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you this is exactly what I was looking for. I need to brush up on templates and STL 
Whoever said nothing's impossible never tried slamming a revolving door!
|
|
|
|
|
My software has unicode display problem. I followed UNICODE articles from this site. But my software menu still can not display UNIcode under the English Win XP OS (Unicode font was installed. On the same computer, the notepad can display unicode. )
Any body has same experience and how you solved this problem?
Many thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
I am looking for some gauge controls like the Dundas gauges, but for MFC and not .NET.
Commercial is ok, but as always free would be better
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
I remember seeing a call that would allow you to download a file via a url in MSDN, I can't for the life of me, remember what it was called.
Anybody know?
Thanks.
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
I think URLDownloadToCacheFile(...) and URLDownloadToFile(...) are what you are looking for. There is an article here on CP that demonstrates at least one of those functions.
Peace!
-=- James
If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Tip for new SUV drivers: Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
DeleteFXPFiles & CheckFavorites (Please rate this post!)
|
|
|
|
|
URLDownloadToFile 
rrrado
|
|
|
|
|
I have a dialog MFC application. Sometimes I show the modeless dialog above parent dialog to display some progress of worker thread. Progress window can be currently moved along the screen. How to make it clipped by parent dialog ? (Something like a view window in the MDI Frame)
Thank you!
rrrado
|
|
|
|
|
By doing so you would be eliminating one of the features of a modeless dialog in this context - why not just show the progress on the underlying dialog and save yourself the trouble?
Anyway, you can handle WM_MOVE on the modeless dialog, and constrain its movement to the bounds of the parent window. This will not really clip the modeless dialog, but that too is not such a good idea because you would be allowing the user to effectively hide the modeless window, again eliminating one of the basic features of a modeless dialog.
Peace!
-=- James
If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Tip for new SUV drivers: Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
DeleteFXPFiles & CheckFavorites (Please rate this post!)
|
|
|
|
|
I cannot show it in underlying window because it contains big area which is useless when not working and there is not enough room in parent window for this.
I'm handling parent movement exactly as you've wrote but it allows to move it for example above right edge of parent and then move parent together with progress to right edge of desktop so progress will be hidden. I don't want to handle all such situations including minimizing window, etc.
There must be some easier sulution and I want to know it
For example WinRar shows progress this way and it looks good
rrrado
|
|
|
|
|
please don't ... me think it goes against good normal Microsoft's UI behaviour ..
BUT ... you could do something different ...
if your progress dialog is modeless and does not really show information ( apart from the progree ); add a status bar to your dialog application and and display the progress in there insted on a popup modeless dialog.
Maximilien Lincourt
Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad
|
|
|
|
|
When selecting an item in a listview I can only highlight the first item, not the entire row. Where´s the problem ?
int nItem = m_Liste.GetNextSelectedItem(pos);
m_Liste.SetItemState( nItem, LVIS_SELECTED, LVIS_SELECTED | LVIS_FOCUSED);
m_Liste.EnsureVisible( nItem, FALSE);
|
|
|
|
|
Check LVS_EX_FULLROWSELECT extended style
rrrado
|
|
|
|
|
Set the LVS_EX_FULLROWSELECT extended style.
I Dream of Absolute Zero
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for you response, but it didn´t help:
int nItem = m_Liste.GetNextSelectedItem(pos);
m_Liste.SetItemState( nItem, LVS_EX_FULLROWSELECT,
LVS_EX_FULLROWSELECT | LVIS_FOCUSED);
m_Liste.EnsureVisible( nItem, FALSE);
|
|
|
|
|
When your ListView control is first created or attached to (like in CDialog::OnInitDialog(...)):
m_Liste.SetExtendedStyle( LVS_EX_FULLROWSELECT );
Peace!
-=- James
If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Tip for new SUV drivers: Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
DeleteFXPFiles & CheckFavorites (Please rate this post!)
|
|
|
|
|
All right, I´ve got it. Thanks a lot.
m_Liste.SetExtendedStyle( LVS_EX_FULLROWSELECT);
POSITION pos;
pos = m_Liste.GetFirstSelectedItemPosition();
if( pos == NULL)
{
*pResult = 0;
return;
}
else
{
// Use the following to display an entire row as selected
// should you need to do so.
int nItem = m_Liste.GetNextSelectedItem(pos);
m_Liste.SetItemState( nItem, LVS_EX_FULLROWSELECT,
LVS_EX_FULLROWSELECT | LVIS_FOCUSED);
m_Liste.EnsureVisible( nItem, FALSE);
}
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone know of an easy to use timer for MFC. Just want to check the time it takes to execute two function calls.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'Ya know, I never understood the use of difftime(...) in this context - time(...) uses a resolution of (whole) seconds, but difftime(...) returns a floating point value...? Has anyone ever really got a fractional value returned from that function?
Anyway, if the function being timed takes less than a second, I would think that using time(...) would be the wrong way to time it.
Peace!
-=- James
If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Tip for new SUV drivers: Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
DeleteFXPFiles & CheckFavorites (Please rate this post!)
|
|
|
|
|
James R. Twine wrote: Has anyone ever really got a fractional value returned from that function?
It's not for fractional numbers, it's the range. Remember that a time_t is (usually) a typedef'd long (not unsigned). It's possible to get a difference between two values that overflows the range of a long, necessitating a larger data type - a double. Since the typedef can change, you can't just use an unsigned long for the return value - it may give different answers if a larger data type is used for time_t. The only practical solution is to use the largest datatype possible.
Ryan "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"
|
|
|
|
|
That is an excellent point that I did not consider. I have been away from 8/16-bit development for too long a time, I guess (and man, I used to LOVE Turbo C...! 
Thanks for that!
Peace!
-=- James
If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Tip for new SUV drivers: Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
DeleteFXPFiles & CheckFavorites (Please rate this post!)
|
|
|
|
|
The quick-n-dirty way is to call GetTickCount() before and after and compare the difference. However, the resolution of that function is not usually 1ms. For example, it is possible to call the function before and after a method that takes 5ms and get back a difference of 0ms one time and 15ms the next.
If you need better accuracy, I would suggest a multimedia timer or something similar.
it MIGHT help to call Sleep() right before calling into the function if you think the function executes is less than a quantum, to try to avoid a context switch while the function is executing.
Peace!
-=- James
If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Tip for new SUV drivers: Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
DeleteFXPFiles & CheckFavorites (Please rate this post!)
|
|
|
|
|
If you're doing it in the development environment, use the profiler.
If you can get it to work (I remember having some "issues"), it is much easier and more accurate than using GetTickCount, etc.
Of course, in production software this is not available.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
