|
Steps to reproduce:
- Enter a solution to a Q&A question.
- Wrap some content within <pre>...</pre> tags.
- Observe how the answer editor preview correctly color codes comments.
- Submit the answer.
Expected result:
The color coding shown in the preview would appear in the submitted solution.
Actual result:
The color coding is ignored.
Example:
ANDROID - retrieving coordinates and displaying on Google maps[^]
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe I don't understand your point, but for me the comments are shown correctly in green...
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
They weren't color coded for me, hence my post.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
You did not select a language attribute in your opening <pre> tag. I changed it to <pre lang="java"> and it looks a bit better.
|
|
|
|
|
*lol* for me it looks exactly the same...
... and I just made this test https://enchroma.com/pages/color-blindness-test[^] with the result "Normal Color View" 
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. The preview showed the comments in green even when I hadn't selected a language. I assumed the preview was WYSIWYG, so maybe that's a bug.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Who is flagging my messages as spam?
|
|
|
|
|
Nobody.
Your messages are being caught by the automated spam filter, and held until a moderator can review them.
The filter works on Bayesian probabilities. There is no way to know why it thinks your messages might be spam. And even if there was, making such information public would be a useful guide for real spammers to avoid the filter.
It can seem annoying. But trust me, you don't want to see what this site would look like without the automated filter! 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, thank you for your reply. I see now how it works Because everybody who can post has to be code project member for some time, I was thinking that some of the support just hide some messages for fun After all, the comments for new articles are not so many, at least in the beginning.
I have posted my message twice, just to be sure that it will appear
|
|
|
|
|
Издислав Издиславов wrote: I have posted my message twice, just to be sure that it will appear
Don't do that. If the moderator rejects the first copy for some reason, they'll also reject the second copy. And posting the same message multiple times will make it look more suspicious.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Hopefully the UI tells them that their message is in the moderation queue. Else there is no reason why they'd not want to try again.
|
|
|
|
|
Nish Nishant wrote: Hopefully the UI tells them that their message is in the moderation queue
I have seen the label, not sure if due to the batch or visible for everyone
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
To add to what Richard says, it will also annoy moderators, who then have to follow you around and wipe up your mess behind you ...
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
So I guess we can all agree that if system allows registered and logged users with some reputation to post messages, which are not flagged as spam, this will make things easier.
|
|
|
|
|
No, the system looks at the message, and uses heuristic and other processes to estimate how likely it is that a message could be spam. It doesn't "target" members, unless they show a history of "spammer-like" activity. Heck, it sent me to moderation for a while but happily let me approve them ...
Just post "normal" messages for a while, and it'll get used to you and moderation will reduce and / or stop. But start posting dodgy links and you will find it is remarkably effective, even if you have a "good posting history"!
It may seem like a pain, but before it was introduced we had problems with flood spam - to the point where you couldn't see anything else - and the originators keep on trying most days to get their cr@p though. Unsuccessfully.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Your non-English name may be adding to your spam-probability-score.
|
|
|
|
|
You actually can be pretty close. The name with Cyrillic letters, which I use, is kind of our version of Ordinary Joe, although little bit more funny, i.e. so maybe when some other people in other forums use it, they can actually be posting spam. And from there the spam score here increases as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there,
Ok my account is blocked. I accepted my mistake. But even though if you guys give no value. So this is it.
modified 17-Mar-19 22:50pm.
|
|
|
|
|
sonuajay wrote: It was my first blog and I was not aware about it.
Now you are
sonuajay wrote: I know code project takes it seriously.
Then you should know, that the answer is 98% going to be "NO"
sonuajay wrote: I will take care next time onwards about this issue.
That has been told thousands of times. In almost all cases, the "author" did it again.
sonuajay wrote: My account email : [removed]
Posting your email in a public forum... don't surprise if you start getting tons of spam
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 14-Mar-19 19:08pm.
|
|
|
|
|
"I didn't know"
"I didn't think"
Theft is theft. Your account is gone, and will not be returning. And we will me looking very closely at everything you post in future ...
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed something strange in my reputation history:
"-1 Debator Post a General Forum Message (undo) Forum Message yat"
"yat"? Clicking on this message that I allegedly posted, I get redirected to Matthew's profile with a ?msg query parameter[^]. However, I'm sure I did not post anything in his message board, or a message with subject "yat" anywhere else.
I don't care about that one point but I am curious now, why is this record there?
|
|
|
|
|
That was a message of mine I deleted. I'll look into what went wrrooongggggg.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
How do I find a user by his display name?
I would like to ask him/her to release "JSOP" so I can rightfully claim ownership.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Because the username is the same as the display name in this case, it can be easily found through the URL: jsop - Professional Profile[^]
Unfortunately I think you're out of luck if you wanted to contact a 15-year old account without posts 
|
|
|
|
|
Well, one of the local CP gods could wave his magic wand and change the display name to "fakejsop". If the account is 15 years old with no activity, I don't think the owner will mind.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
