|
Thanks . Let me know once it deployed on portal
|
|
|
|
|
It make no sense at all to combine these 2 subject in the same forum. There are mainly 2 separate worlds.
Philippe Mori
|
|
|
|
|
+1
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe they should separate forums into "Abandoned MS Technologies" and "Current MS Erection Technologies". Of course, almost everything would end up as a sub-category under the Abandoned group.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
There is not enough traffic in each to justify splitting them.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: There is not enough traffic in each to justify splitting them.
Hey Chris,
In my opinion, that still does not justify combining two unrelated forums. Unless you rename the forum to "Everything else".
|
|
|
|
|
For example, If Member A asks Member B to up-vote all Member A's answers, Member A would get more rep points.
Does CP site handles such cases? If so, how?
P.S:
Actually I thought of this while I found one member was featured in top expert in last 24 hrs section (with more than 500pts in last 24hrs), but when I looked into this recent activities like posting answer, messages etc there were no such activity in last 24 hrs. I was wondering then how could that member get 500pts in last 24hrs.
The example above, I would think of, is one possibility.
|
|
|
|
|
Example...
Someone answers 10 questions over 24 hours ago.
The people he answered each accept the answers given, thus 250 points to start with...
A few platinums upvote at 40 points a time and the 500 plus points are gained within the current 24 hours without an answer being given.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC Link[ ^]
Trolls[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Dave, your example is genuine case where top performers get rewarded.
But, my question is, What if Member B intentionally up-votes Member A's few months old 40 answers in 15 minutes? Member A would then easily get 400pts even if Member B is silver.
So, does CP handles such cases?
|
|
|
|
|
You could not say definitively that Member B was in cahoots with A, there is no proof.
There are often unusual voting patterns, but it really shouldn't concern people, points are not converted to money you know!
Why should this bother you so much?
You have been a member for 48 hours, so just enjoy the site.
As for older votes, consider this...
You answer a question, and are rewarded at the time.
Some months later the OP posts back about a particular issue on that answer.
This moves it back to the top of the Q&A list where others see the answer and think it good enough to upvote.
That way it could be 3 months after the answer was given and points are awarded.
Use the site before criticizing the metrics.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC Link[ ^]
Trolls[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote: points are not converted to money
Very true 
|
|
|
|
|
I think, 2 months ago...I got a reply(Thanks note with vote) from OP for my answer. But the question(Crystal report) was almost 1 1/2 year old! I have answered that question when I was new to this site.
|
|
|
|
|
your effort not wasted 
|
|
|
|
|
Look at the Rep Points FAQ - the number of up and down votes a member can get for various items is limited. For instance, a user can get no more than 25 up and down votes in a given day. The same holds true for up/down votes for Q/A answers.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
While the site does (and rightly so in my opinon) handle vote-bombing which is abuse, I don't think the site should worry about an author/member social engineering his way to higher reputation levels. It's outside the scope of the site's voting system in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
And I also agree with what Dave said, these cases are unusual patterns and doesn't bother much.
|
|
|
|
|
Am also very surprised after seeing this CP Staff[^] profile, how she got rep. points without posting anything.. 
modified 29-Dec-11 4:23am.
|
|
|
|
|
I am not surprised. Without people like Deeksha, articles would not get edited. I'd say that was quite a contribution. What value have you added to CP?
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Without people like Deeksha, articles would not get edited.
Agree!!, even my Tip also edited by Deeksha only.
Quote: What value have you added to CP?
My doubt is how she gets 1460 under Author, where articles are 0.???
|
|
|
|
|
It might have something to do with her staff status while editing articles. In any case, 1400 points certainly isn't enough to be concerned about because even without those points, her rep score still supported by her editing activities.
EDIT ===================
Why was this voted down? I just don't understand.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
modified 29-Dec-11 9:46am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Without people like Deeksha, articles would not get edited.
Agree, they beautified my poor Tips/Tricks many times
|
|
|
|
|
I created a tag this morning "StoredProcedures" and it has been longer than 1 hour and it has not updated in the Tag's list. I have noticed this in the past, as well.
[edit] I see it now but it still shows no items associated to the tag in the master tag list.
Just along for the ride.
"the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
"No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
"It is the celestial scrotum of good luck!" - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
Currently the author (or the editor) can tag an article or tip/trick. Would it make sense if the readers would also have the opportunity to add (separate) 'reader' tags.
Obviously these tags wouldn't describe the article from the content point of view but from the readers point of view. For example tags could include things like level of the information, usefulness on different areas etc.
As the current tags, these wouldn't be predefined, but would have a life of their own.
I'd feel that this would be kind of an addition to the voting system giving more information about the article. Currently this kind of information is quite scattered in the comments.
|
|
|
|
|
hello i want to know that whether my article is accepted or rejected or under processing.
how shoulid i know that?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
