|
well, now it works as expected 
Regards,
unruledboy_at_gmail_dot_com
http://www.xnlab.com
|
|
|
|
|
In my experience, the only organization that comes close to understanding relevance is Google.
I always use Date Created Desc[^], it is the only one that works for me. And I made it a browser favorite, so I always get creation order automatically (as long as I avoid all the CP search boxes).
[EDIT] Link fixed, once more a victim of the arbitrarily-truncate-pasted-link-bug that has been plaguing CP for months now [/EDIT]
modified 21-Nov-11 16:53pm.
|
|
|
|
|
tricky, but are you sure you are having the latest favorite? because when I click your link, it's still sort by relevance and when I click search, it's really not for the date created 
Regards,
unruledboy_at_gmail_dot_com
http://www.xnlab.com
|
|
|
|
|
all fixed now. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
When I click on that link I can see your article.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris,
Sorry for posting in two message forums. I didn't know which one is the right place. I was getting a 301 to a 404 page.
http://www.codeproject.com/script/common/404.aspx?aspxerrorpath=/kb/dotnet/clrmethodinjection.aspx
I cleared my cache and it seems to be working now.
Thanks
Ziad
|
|
|
|
|
I voted this tip a one, and put a comment why: How to copy-protect a page using JavaScript in ASP.NET[^] I also put a message explaining why in more detail.
The Tip has been approved, so the voting is reset - fine, that's good - and the messages pre-approval are gone - also fine - but the compulsory comment about why I voted one remains - it looks odd to have a "reason for my vote of one" with no votes on a Tip.
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
The comment is still valid.
When I was a coder, we worked on algorithms. Today, we memorize APIs for countless libraries — those libraries have the algorithms - Eric Allman
|
|
|
|
|
|
We're *this* close to having that done.
[Edit: Unfortunately we've about-faced and won't be supporting this]
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
modified 13-Jan-15 20:40pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I jumped on CP the other day to post something I wanted JSOP to see, but I also wanted to share the post with the community. After making the post, I had the thought that it might be nice to have a name hash tag so that when we mention someone by name (or alias) in a post, they'll get a notification (which users can elect to disable).
If you have G+ this would work exactly like their '+' command.
Being that were nerdy programmer types, might I suggest you all use a '*'
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
yesterday my article MVVM Pattern Made Simple[^] had 22 fives and 8 fours (total 30 votes). The average was given as 4.76 (even though the mathematical average would be 4.73).
Today someone added a "five" to me - I have 23 fives and 8 fours. Unexplicably my average for the article went down - it is now 4.66 (even though the mathematical average is 4.74).
Can you, please, verify you algorithms.
Thanks
Nick Polyak
|
|
|
|
|
Voting is weighted, so higher status members have votes that count for more. That explains the deviation from the arithmetic averages.
But getting a 5 should never drop the score, so it may be a bug.
|
|
|
|
|
"You have already voted..." comes after you actually voted for the survey.
For any survey, if user is already voted, he should not be allowed to vote again.
so, the message: "You have already voted..." should come before user is actually voting second time.
People may not remember whether he has already voted or not.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, it should, but I'm cheating. To remove the button for voting before you vote would mean a pre-emptive database check to see if you've voted. We'd have to do that for every visitor to the site, which is extra load that's unnecessary. Doing it the way we do it means the check is done on-demand.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Free Dating Sites[^]
I dont know how this dump could be a featured article on codeproject homepage.
|
|
|
|
|
It's catering for our lonelier members. Don't they deserve love?
|
|
|
|
|
OK - let's not get into the mankini thing again 
When I was a coder, we worked on algorithms. Today, we memorize APIs for countless libraries — those libraries have the algorithms - Eric Allman
|
|
|
|
|
I never got into the mankini in the first place. Mine is not the body you want to see in a Mankini.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, come on - I'm sure you do yourself an injustice.
When I was a coder, we worked on algorithms. Today, we memorize APIs for countless libraries — those libraries have the algorithms - Eric Allman
|
|
|
|
|
My wife told me this. 
|
|
|
|
|
Slap her for me, will ya. Tell her I'm disgusted!
When I was a coder, we worked on algorithms. Today, we memorize APIs for countless libraries — those libraries have the algorithms - Eric Allman
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Don't they deserve love?
Ah, sorry I forgot you for a moment. But do you really think that I don't care you?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
