|
If you click the "Report" button again to see how many new reports there are, it will remove the old reputation event and create a new one.
Somebody in an online forum wrote: INTJs never really joke. They make a point. The joke is just a gift wrapper.
|
|
|
|
|
That explains it.
Thanks 
|
|
|
|
|
This is certainly not an important thing.
But wouldn't it be nice if the rightmost column in the forums, that tell you how long time ago a message was posted, would update itself every minute.
|
|
|
|
|
An intereting idea. Not too difficult, either. I'll add it to the TODO.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I answered to sql command in code behind C#.net[^] that question.
In my reputation history I can see my answer got accepted and then the acceptation was undone (+25 yay!, -25 ahh...)
I have seen this a couple of times in the last few days, but I've answered more questions than usual, so that might account for me noticing it (or people really undoing their acceptance).
However in this case it seems my answer really IS accepted as it displays in green on the QA page.
It's an OO world.
public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{}
|
|
|
|
|
There is some difference between this[^] light green and this[^] green.
First green will be displayed if your answer got more than 3 votes and the second will displayed if your answer accepted. So, don't confuse. Your answer might be accepted and later rejected by OP. Still you got 3 votes, so its showing light green.
A friend walks in when everyone else walks out...
|
|
|
|
|
I guess that solves my 'bug' 
It's an OO world.
public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{}
|
|
|
|
|
Just curious if Lounge posts' 'votability' ever expires.
Noticed a fresh -16 vote on a post I made a few days ago, and wondered if my sins are eternal False modesty prevents me from asking the reciprocal question based on 'virtues.'
best, Bill
"Last year I went fishing with Salvador Dali. He was using a dotted
line. He caught every other fish." Steven Wright
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: Noticed a fresh -16 vote on a post I made a few days ago,
get over it.
Complaining about your vanity smears will garner no sympathy from the masses. I should know.
Just along for the ride.
"the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
"No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: Complaining about your vanity smears will garner no sympathy from the masses. I
should know.
What we need is a secret vanity forum so people can voice their reputation concerns safely 
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: voice their reputation concerns safely
and discretely, of course; without fear of retribution.
Just along for the ride.
"the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
"No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: and discretely, of course; without fear of retribution.
Exactly.
BTW, your secret URL and passcode has been snail-mailed to you. Watch out for a bright yellow postcard with large 12pt Verdana text on the back.
|
|
|
|
|
I dream of a CodeProject Prime membership option, where members pay $100 per year for the privilege of seeing (or not seeing) rep points displayed; this includes access to a secret Prime rep-points forum.
One quirk of Prime membership is that a member can pay for multiple Prime memberships; the member doesn't get any additional benefits, but each Prime membership comes with a bonus 1,000 rep points.
In addition, Prime members will have the distinctive Prime mickey-mouse ears displayed above their member icon.
|
|
|
|
|
Hans Dietrich wrote: In addition, Prime members will have the distinctive Prime mickey-mouse
ears Optimus Prime displayed above as their member icon.
FTFY.
|
|
|
|
|
You may interpret my post as a "complaint," and as an indication I am not "over something," and as having something do with "vanity smears." Of course, I have no control over your interpretation, deo gratia.
But the interpretation you create sounds to me like your own psychodrama related to your own experience, not mine. If you've had a bad time lately with rep, I'm sorry.
The "vanity" thing was your invention.
My question was a simple question about if voting on Lounge posts is 'forever.' And, it was phrased in a way meant to be humorously and paradoxically self-referential: there is a wealth of connotations ... literary and otherwise ... to the term 'false modesty.' And to imply I would not ask if my 'virtues' would, like my 'sins,' persist forever because of "false modesty" is a form of a certain type of rhetorical jest, a reductio ad absurdum.
In the post that was down-voted I said what I meant, and I am perfectly comfortable living with the consequences: with the caveat that, like any other person in CP, if I observed what might be a pattern of negative down-voting for some personal reason ... some vendetta ... I'd bring that up here.
The only thing in this that, at all, disappointed me was the confirmation that putting content in the Lounge that attempts to improve CP by advocating using its current structure as it is intended to be used ... with the assumption the OP would actually be helped with a technical problem thereby ... is a waste of time.
cheers, Bill
"Last year I went fishing with Salvador Dali. He was using a dotted
line. He caught every other fish." Steven Wright
|
|
|
|
|
You have been here, with the site for 9 years and 9 months...really?
Just along for the ride.
"the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
"No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
Verba volant, scripta manent.
|
|
|
|
|
Time flies like an arrow.
Fruit flies like a banana.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, there is no time-limit to voting on a post. There is a pracical limit though if you try and vote on a message from say 2-3 years back, the code/server times out.
|
|
|
|
|
No it doesn't
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I have noticed, that articles from my blog were not submitted to CodeProject about 5 days.
So I recreated the 'Feed' again.
The new feed was created and it tried to poll the blog, but I always get the following message:
Your blog has been successfully submitted but no Technical Blog entries were consumed.
My articles, as always, contain the required anchor tag. It always work, but somehow it stopped to work for me. So now, I am not able to submit articles from my blog.
Please, could somebody help me?
|
|
|
|
|
It looks I am the only one having this problem and I am giving up  .
The feeding simply stopped to work for my blog.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry for not getting back to you earlier, but in checking your profile I can't see any blog feeds associated with your profile
(Your blog feeds[^]
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris, thanks for the response.
When the blog-feed did not work for me I deleted it (after many attempts to recover it) and submitted my article manually.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah. That's why I couldn't debug the issue 
If you send me your feed directly via email (chris at codeproject) I can dig in and have a look.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
