|
When the automatic update locks up, the usual reason is cache corruption.
The easiest way to solve it is to goto, Control Panel - System, and select the Automatic Update tab.
Select "Turn off Automatic Updates" and restart the computer. This should clear the cache. Now you can put it on again.
|
|
|
|
|
Nice one. 
Simon
|
|
|
|
|
Learned that one when MS sent out an update that corrupted the cache by default.
|
|
|
|
|
If anyone would like to have the further option of being able to disable the automatic updates; just run "services.msc" and you will find windows "automatic updates" listed with other service application programs; from microsoft and non microsoft sources.
Just right click on any of the services listed and you get the choice of either having it set: automatic or manuel or at disable.
I prefer to do manuel updates myself.I go by the motto- if it is not broken ,do not try to fix it.
One source of regular windows updates information is techrepublic.com and they will email you their weekly news letter.
Even if you disable a service that is listed in services.msc; there is still the chance that some
other program could turn it back on; as the services.msc is one of the locations in a computer that malware can get installed and stored in the computer.
Or even some of the microsoft updates could possibly, under some circumstances,turn the automatic updates setting back to "automatic".
If the computer user would like a more complete editing option other than just using the "disable" or "manuel" or "automatic" settings option that are a part of the services.msc application; then it is easily available in the regedit.
The path is: HKLM > System > CurrentControlSet > Services.
The total list of "services.msc" programs are listed in the "services" key.
The services key lists them using the "service" name, not the "display" name , both of which are listed when you right click on any of the programs that are listed in the services.msc
If you permanently delete any of the services that that are listed in the services key;be sure to do a complete reboot if you want to also delete the name entries that will be left behind in the services.msc .
The regedit editing of the services.msc - was from the monthly computer magazine from www.smartcomputing.com - the sept/2006 issue on page 38.
Some public and college libraries have some computer magazine subscriptions.
-winch1020
|
|
|
|
|
Great , thanks Jörgen.
I did it and it sounds to resolve my problem .
|
|
|
|
|
Cool. We're making progress.
wuauclt is the windows auto updater.
Try uploading the exe to http://www.virustotal.com/[^] to check it for viruses.
Try googling for known problems with wuauclt. (You'll probably get a bunch of people saying it's a virus and you should delete it. Just ignore them unless virustotal scans it as bad)
Simon
|
|
|
|
|
I couldn't open it . 
|
|
|
|
|
Open what? You don't need to open it.
In process explorer. Right click->properties. Image tab. Note down the path. Goto http://www.virustotal.com/[^]. Click browse. Browse to the path you noted down. Click ok. Click send file. Wait for the file to be uploaded. Wait for the file to be analysed, and look at the results.
Have you tried what Jörgen said. That sounds like a very good suggestion to me.
Simon
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry , I can't open the website . 
|
|
|
|
|
Oh...I see. Is it blocked at your work? Suppose you'll have to copy the file and send it when you get home. Or you can send it by email:
Sending files by email
Create a new message with scan@virustotal.com as destination address of your email.
1. Write SCAN in the Subject field.
2. Attach the file to be scanned. Such file must not exceed 20 MB in size. If the attached file is larger, the system will reject it automatically.
3. You will receive an email with a report of the file analysis. Response time will vary depending on the load of the system at the time of placing your request. (Assuming your company doesn't automatically strip .exe files out of emails)
It's just an online virus scanner that runs all the big scanners (like Norton, Mcafee, etc) over the file and compares the results. If you haven't already, I'd try Jörgen's suggestion first.
Simon
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very nuch anyway Simon.
I'll scan it with EAST antivirus
|
|
|
|
|
it seems that al of the service pack 3`s are the same in this problem !
i had this problem too
my friend gave me file that when i ran it in the safe mode made it work smooth and good!
i can`t find it right now, but if u wanna have that, i can mail it
just give me ur mail address 
|
|
|
|
|
The www.kadaitcha.cx is for xp and vista users and
features an index of topics including a page on 64 bit O.P. systems.
The site also has recently started a forum page with different categories of topics.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, but no thanks. I have pretty much everything I need here.
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
I have 3 PCS. PC A can access PC B but not PC C. In the same way, PC C can access PC B but not PC A.
PC A <-> PC B <-> PC C
So if I want to transfer files from A to C, I need to first store it in B then let B transfer the files to C or instruct C to get the files from B.
What can you guys suggest is the EASIEST way to accomplish this?
Thanks! 
It is said that the most complex structures built by mankind are software systems. This is not generally appreciated because most people cannot see them. Maybe that's a good thing because if we saw them as buildings, we'd deem many of them unsafe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We already have a router. Its just that the network is designed that way.
It is said that the most complex structures built by mankind are software systems. This is not generally appreciated because most people cannot see them. Maybe that's a good thing because if we saw them as buildings, we'd deem many of them unsafe.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you fill us in a bit more on how the network is configured?
And why some of them can't see each other?
Love your sig by the way.
|
|
|
|
|
PC A is in domain A. PC C is in domain C. Domain C is a "Secure Network" wherein only authorized people can access the domain. PC A is sort-of a "Public Domain".
PC B is sort-of a "gatekeeper". In order to access computers on Domain C, you must first connect to PC B.
So if I'm using PC A and I want to transfer files to PC C, I must first need to copy the files to PC B, and instruct PC B to transfer the files to PC C.
Any suggestions?
It is said that the most complex structures built by mankind are software systems. This is not generally appreciated because most people cannot see them. Maybe that's a good thing because if we saw them as buildings, we'd deem many of them unsafe.
|
|
|
|
|
I assume that PC B is having two network cards with one card connected to network A and the other card to network C. And that PC B is belonging to either or neither domain. But the fact that computers in both domains are having access to the "Bridge" computer makes the whole concept doubtful at the best...
I would have a talk to the network architect how you're supposed to use the network. Until then you can take a look at Robocopy which is a standard feature on Server 2008 and available in the resource kit for the prior versions. Run robocopy /? for some help on the usage. An interesting feature is the /MIR switch
|
|
|
|
|
You got it exactly right.
Right now I am using PSEXEC but I am thinking of developing a remote execution tool.
It is said that the most complex structures built by mankind are software systems. This is not generally appreciated because most people cannot see them. Maybe that's a good thing because if we saw them as buildings, we'd deem many of them unsafe.
|
|
|
|
|
I just don't see the point with a "secure network" if you want to be able to remote execute from the outside.
I would exchange this "PC B" for a firewall that is closed for everything on the outside, and allow a limited amount of services to access the outside to FETCH files.
|
|
|
|
|
it storngly depends on the network design
it might that there is a problem in connecting pc A and pc B
i think that it`s good to chek the connections first
|
|
|
|
|
You're trying to violate the security of a network that is designed to prevent you from accessing it. There's probably a good reason for that. The "right" way to do this is to establish trust relationships between the two domains, but your admin has chosen not to do so. It may be that, though it is inconvenient for you, the best choice for your organization is to continue using the tedious method. Another choice might be to establish an account in the remote domain for yourself that includes transferring files into the domain from outside. Remote Access priveleges can be established that will allow you to log on to the other domain from the local and make transfers oer that connection.
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
|
|
|
|
|
Hello all,
I need help with Virtual PC 2007. I got virtual PC created by someone else. The virtual PC has SQL Server 2005 in it. I want to install Visual Studio (Trial version) from a CD. I already installed on my laptop, but I want to know how to install on virtual PC.
I tried to share the DVD folder from the laptop and thought I can just install from the Virtal PC, but it just shows the files from the folder.
Can anyone help me in this. Please let me know if the question is not clear.
Thanks
Mark.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
