|
This is a question we should all take very seriously because it's no joke that excess deaths have risen alarmingly for all age groups in the last 2.5 years.
|
|
|
|
|
I hate this kind of news too. If I die from colon cancer, or pancreatic cancer, so be it, let people know. Why should it be kept secret? Being open is good so other people can be more wary, which diseases kill people the most, and have that part of their body checked.
I hate it when I read 'rapidly spreading serious medical condition' bla bla bla..
|
|
|
|
|
ZZ to you brother.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
death : you need to die
death : how the f*ck do I quit vim ...
death : aarrrggghhhhh you'll live to see another day.
CI/CD = Continuous Impediment/Continuous Despair
|
|
|
|
|
vim ?
CI/CD = Continuous Impediment/Continuous Despair
|
|
|
|
|
#Worldle #563 3/6 (100%)
π©π©π©π¨β¬β¬
οΈ
π©π©π©π©π¨β‘οΈ
π©π©π©π©π©π
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
#Worldle #564 1/6 (100%)
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉
https:
Okay I admit I did use Google maps to check my assumption before submitting it.
βThat which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.β
β Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
Is there anyone here who works on systems that print food labels. The specific ones I'm thinking about are small sachets of soy sauce, or the labels printed for in-store, freshly baked bread.
The labels that are 90% whitespace with 2pt high text that you almost need a microscope to read.
The trend of unreadably-tiny-font-on-an-area-that-could-accomodate-a-billboard seems to have been increasing in the past few years and I would love an actual reason for it.
My guesses
- They don't actually want you to read the labels. They package the raisin bread with the whole grain bread in the same exact package, label, tie, everything, with the only difference being the teeny tiny words that allow you distinguish, in the mood lighting of the bread department, what it actually is. It makes shifting unwanted inventory easier
- They have software that can't scale a font to make it fit the space, and also have to cater to labels that are potentially 1024 characters long, so they take space / # chars = microscopic font. Problem solved!
- Someone in accounting worked out that based on font size, total chars printed, total number of labels, and the cost of ink, they would save $5.47 each year if they printed in 2pt font size.
- No one involved from label design to product creation to printing to stocking has ever actually tried purchasing a product printed like this in an actual store. To save time and money they did zero usability testing
- They are simply evil.
Can anyone shed some light here?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
They're all young developers with good eye sight.
As you get older the fonts needed goes from small to nana-vision...
A Fine is a Tax for doing something wrong
A Tax is a Fine for doing something good.
modified 7-Aug-23 22:50pm.
|
|
|
|
|
When I was young I didn't understand why my Dad couldn't read stuff I had no trouble with. I knew old people's eyesight was poorer, but not my Dad, surely? Now, many decades later, I get it!
It is easy for businesses to set standards for their packaging. That they obviously don't, or don't bother to enforce them, suggests that they just don't care. Well now, there's a surprise!
|
|
|
|
|
That's may be part of the problem but I always carry a pair of cheaters with me to correct for that particular issue.
The problem is that some of the companies just do stupid stuff. Years ago, I purchased a new HSF for my computer and the instructions for installation came on a piece of paper approximately 2x3 inches. Turns out they'd shrunk the 8.5x11 inch original instruction page to fit in the packaging (assumption here). I had to go to their website to get the full page instructions which were readable.
|
|
|
|
|
6. The developer who wrote the label printing software got the code from SO and doesn't know how to modify it. 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: 6. The developer who wrote the label printing software got the code from SOChatGPT and doesn't know how to modify it.
ftfy
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Credit to that user, he did asked how to on this site but no code given and thus no answer. ChatGPT gave him a false answer by stating it is the correct font to use, carry on... 
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe to save some printing cost. Most business decisions are driven by the cost so I don't know why this would be any different.
|
|
|
|
|
As a matter of fact, I've made labels for packagings in the meat industry.
Your #2 is pretty close to the mark.
Mostly, the software that creates labels isn't exactly high-tech, so scaling is not something it does.
The size of labels is restrained by the printers a company has, those printers aren't easily replaced because you'd have to change all labels too, which can easily grow into the hundreds (different labels for different products, countries, customers, etc.).
Labels are usually too small for all the data that producers are now legally obliged to print.
There's a big chance your label is unreadably small because the Arab translation of the text is a bit longer and the label has to accommodate both.
And sometimes it's just that font size 8 is too big, but font size 7 is too small (or there is no 7 and you have to fall back to 6), and if those are your option you go for the size that fits and call it a day!
BarTender is popular label printing and design software and this is what it looks like: BarTender[^]
Chris Maunder wrote: No one involved from label design to product creation to printing to stocking
There's usually not really any design phase.
Some IT guy just makes a label and drags and resizes until it fits.
The people who print the labels and put them on the packaging are not paid nearly enough to care!
Chris Maunder wrote: To save time and money they did zero usability testing
I've never heard of a label being usability tested 
They print the label once to check if all necessary data is on it (read, they can't be sued) and continue with more important business.
Companies don't make those labels for you, they make them so you can see their logo and they don't get fined by their government.
modified 8-Aug-23 3:26am.
|
|
|
|
|
Good old fashioned arse covering 
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
I'm deeply depressed and so totally not surprised.
Thank you so much for the great answer and insight. It's very cool to be able to throw out a question like that and get an insider's view.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Do what the "weed" people do: a "2-ply" label that peels apart with the pre-printed instructions, etc. inside. Two sides versus part of one face.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
Gerry Schmitz wrote: the "weed" people
At first I thought you were referring to me because I'm Dutch
For the record, I never smoked weed, but have had plenty of opportunity.
|
|
|
|
|
Well now, funny how they can arrange all the other printing on the packaging to be larger than life to grab your attention, but somehow the stuff they'd rather you didn't pay attention to has to be, for a variety of apparently insurmountable reasons, almost too tiny to read!
|
|
|
|
|
Possibly convenience.
If you have a large font that fills the available area then you need to align the print very well and you will get occasional mismatches - these will be a reject - product and all - and cost money.
It is easier to use a small font and aim for the centre, then a little misalignment does not create a reject.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: They don't actually want you to read the labels
Hiding all the "stuffed ingredients" in small print like 2g chlorine, 0.1g sianide... In bolder readable letters - "The safest product ever!, consume it now"! 
|
|
|
|
|
Obligatory XKCD
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
It's No. 5. Definitely.
Seriously, I think that Sander's explanation is probably close to the mark.
Certain countries mandate a minimal point size for ingredients, the "small print" on contracts, etc. In some of them, a contract that is printed in too-small font can even be invalidated on that basis!
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
