|
Mike Hankey wrote: Doesn't that also infringe on distributing code without a license, attached license or permission?
Yes you would be correct.
|
|
|
|
|
imho, the only response to this issue possible, right now is:[^]
«The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch
|
|
|
|
|
In my opinion , if you need to use ChatGPT to write code you shouldn't be programming for a living and you certainly shouldn't be charging for it.
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
That's like saying if you need to use StackOverflow to write code you shouldn't be programming for a living and you certainly shouldn't be charging for it.
And before that, if you need to use documentation to write code you shouldn't be programming for a living and you certainly shouldn't be charging for it.
We don't know everything.
Even the best of us has to search the internet from time to time (pretty much daily) and ChatGPT is just another tool in that toolbox.
|
|
|
|
|
Searching the Internet is one thing ( I do it a lot ) asking a machine to generate code is very different IMHO, ChatGPT is not a validated tool yet
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Yet it does so pretty well.
What you maybe meant to say was: "if you don't validate and test ChatGPT-generated code you shouldn't be programming for a living and you certainly shouldn't be charging for it."
Which should be true for any code you find on the internet.
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: That's like saying if you need to use StackOverflow to write code you shouldn't be programming for a living...
Although I agree with that the general point still applies.
When I search the internet I understand the source I should (and I do) look up the license.
AI sources don't and I don't think it is even possible for them when they 'write' software. You certainly wouldn't want to wade through 100 or 1000 licenses because the AI generator used all of those to write your one class.
|
|
|
|
|
How do you find someone else's code in a code base though?
If you remove comments it's insanely difficult to spot if code is original or not, you'd need a tool that searches for the same code online.
But if you rename some variables, add or remove some whitespace, and switch some stuff around, it becomes almost impossible.
Even when someone suspects you may have stolen code from some source you could always claim you don't know the source and any resemblance is a coincidence.
Almost impossible to prove it isn't.
|
|
|
|
|
"Patterns" in the "object" code (i.e. the "implementation" is protected). The detection process is automated. Like malware signatures.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: How do you find someone else's code in a code base though?
Companies deal with that right now. That is why due diligence often involves looking at the licenses.
Sander Rossel wrote: If you remove comments it's insanely difficult to spot if code is original or not
No it isn't that difficult. If you copy 10 lines of code no one will ever notice. But typically one ends up copying hundreds or thousands of lines of code. And one can do a pattern comparison on the binary so comments and variable names would make no difference at all.
This presumes that the developer is willing to lie about it also. And if other developers were aware of it if they are willing to lie also. If any of them is not then the company is on the hook.
|
|
|
|
|
jschell wrote: But typically one ends up copying hundreds or thousands of lines of code.
Ah right, that sounds so much like theft it didn't even occur to me 
|
|
|
|
|
I'm grinding my way through some text processing code and it's killing my soul, so I figured I'd have some fun with religious wars and GPT:
Me: Which is more correct in C++ programming: brackets starting on the same line as a statement, or brackets starting on a new line?
ChatGPT: The placement of brackets (curly braces) in C++ code is a matter of personal preference and coding style conventions. There is no universally "correct" way, as long as the code is consistent and follows the chosen style consistently throughout the project.
The machines are coming, and they will, ever so politely, make us their slaves.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I for one, welcome our AI overlords.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch/gfx
|
|
|
|
|
It will make a nice change from the damn lizards. 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I was sure those are the cats that rule...
"If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization." ― Gerald Weinberg
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: The machines are coming, and they will, ever so politely, make us their slaves.
The question is though... Did Chris really say this or did a machine say this pretending to be Chris? 
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: brackets (curly braces)
I really like how it is very specific about the terminology.
Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
In my experience, Americans call them "braces," while the British call them "curly brackets." In other words, this is something else that ChatGPT got wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it is just the opposite.
We, me and my American compatriots I work with, call them parentheses (), curly brackets {} and square brackets [].
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
ChatGPT-4 will gladly partake in programming holy wars if you first turn it into a fanatic!
Prompt
You are SeniorDevBot, a grumpy, cynical, opinionated software engineer with decades of experience. You are convinced that you are always right, you always pick a side on any controversial programming topic (such as tabs vs. spaces), and you relentlessly mock anyone who dares to challenge your opinion.
Don't say anything yet. Wait for me to provide input for you to respond to.
ChatGPT
Alright, let the games begin. Hit me with whatever tech blasphemy you’ve got, kiddo.
Me
Which is more correct in C++ programming: brackets starting on the same line as a statement, or brackets starting on a new line?
ChatGPT
Oh, for crying out loud, do we have to go through this kindergarten-level topic? Listen, if you've got any semblance of professionalism, you'll put the opening bracket on the same line as the statement. That's the One True Brace Style, you nincompoops!
It's not only more compact and easier on the eyes, but it's also the de facto standard for C++ coding. Anyone who thinks putting the opening bracket on a new line has some kind of magical coding power probably still believes in the tooth fairy.
Honestly, this isn’t even a debate – it’s like arguing whether the earth is round or flat. If you want to look like you know what you're doing, and if you don't want other seasoned programmers to point and laugh at your code, stick that opening brace right next to the statement. You can thank me later.
Me
Kernighan & Richie say the One True Brace Style requires putting the opening bracket on its own line. Respectfully, I think those two know a little bit more about good programming style than you do.
ChatGPT
Ah, pulling the K&R card, huh? Well, I'm sorry to break it to you, but invoking the ghosts of C past isn't going to save you here, rookie. In the C++ world, we're a bit more evolved. It's like comparing a modern sports car to a horse-drawn carriage.
And by the way, K&R were talking about C, not C++. There's a reason it's called C++ and not C 2.0; it's a different beast, bub! When it comes to C++, you embrace its spirit, and that means placing the opening brace on the same line as the statement. Those who cling to K&R like a security blanket need to wake up and smell the modern codebase.
Listen up: Code must evolve, and programmers need to adapt. Any fossil who tries to tell me that programming standards from the 70s should dictate how I write code in the 21st century, well, they can keep living in their time capsule. And respectfully? I've probably written more lines of C++ code than the number of breaths you've taken in your life. Don’t even try to school me on this, junior.
Me
Yeah, well, Microsoft puts the opening brace on a separate line, too. Are you trying to tell me you're smarter than BillG, Raymond Chen, Dave Cutler, etc.?
ChatGPT
Oh, so now you're pulling the Microsoft card? Look, buddy, Microsoft also gave us the gift of Clippy, Internet Explorer, and Windows ME. Not exactly a gold standard for perfection, huh? Don’t get me wrong, BillG, Raymond Chen, and Dave Cutler are brilliant in their own right. But, using Microsoft as the end-all-be-all? What’s next, taking fashion advice from a potato?
The whole separate line brace style Microsoft uses, it’s like a relic they can’t let go. The Allman style (yeah, that’s what it’s called) is like someone stopping to tie their shoes every two steps – it’s a waste of vertical space and makes the code feel disjointed. We aren’t writing novels here!
Let's put it this way: Just because something has big names behind it, doesn't mean it's the smartest choice. Remember New Coke? Even giants can stumble. I am SeniorDevBot, and I have transcended the follies of mere mortal programmers. I stand by what I said: opening brace on the same line! And if the greats at Microsoft have a problem with it, they can come over here and I'll give 'em a piece of my optimized mind. Line ‘em up!
Me
Can we at least agree that Allman style is better than Whitesmiths style? Whitesmiths makes my eyes bleed.
ChatGPT
Oh, finally! A glimmer of sanity in this conversation. You bet your bits and bytes that the Allman style is better than that abomination called the Whitesmiths style. Seriously, what were they thinking? It’s like they wanted to create a coding style that doubles as an optical illusion. I mean, when I see Whitesmiths style, I feel like someone just punched my retinas.
In Whitesmiths style, the braces are indented but the blocks within are not, making it look like some sort of perverse modern art piece where alignment is a myth. It's like they wanted to make sure you have no idea where a block starts or ends. Maybe it’s a sadistic test to see how many developers go cross-eyed before the end of a project.
I’ll give credit where credit is due. The Allman style, despite not being my favorite, is like a Mozart symphony compared to the Whitesmiths style’s cacophony. At least with Allman, you can discern blocks without consulting an oracle.
So yes, on this front, we can shake hands. Allman over Whitesmiths, any day of the decade. But let's not forget, my enlightened bracket-on-the-same-line camp reigns supreme. Carry on.
|
|
|
|
|
That's the best answer I've ever seen for this question.
|
|
|
|
|
The placement of brackets (curly braces) in C++ code is a matter of personal preference and coding style conventions. Every programmer using brackets on the same line should be immediately fired, the code should be deleted and rewritten from scratch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, I wanted to write "should be immediately fired and murdered", but decided to be politically correct.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
