|
Wordle 670 3/6*
β¬π¨π©β¬π¨
β¬π©π©π©π©
π©π©π©π©π©
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 670 6/6
π¨β¬β¬β¬π©
β¬π©π©β¬π©
β¬π©π©β¬π©
β¬π©π©β¬π©
π©π©π©β¬π©
π©π©π©π©π©
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 670 3/6
β¬β¬π©β¬π©
β¬β¬π©π¨π©
π©π©π©π©π©
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 670 3/6*
β¬π¨π¨π¨β¬
π¨π¨π©β¬β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
|
|
|
|
|
#Worldle #453 6/6 (100%)
π©π©π©π¨β¬β¬οΈ
π©π©π©π©β¬βοΈ
π©π©π©π©π¨β‘οΈ
π©π©π©π©β¬β‘οΈ
π©π©π©π©π¨β‘οΈ
π©π©π©π©π©π
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
hard one even with map
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
modified 19-Apr-23 23:15pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dooon't get me started on the friggin' using directive. 
|
|
|
|
|
If you don't like the using directive in VS, try dealing with Java where you have to declare the specific methods and not just the class. Drove me nuts during my short tenure as an Android developer.
|
|
|
|
|
I have only a mild interest in developing for Android. Not enough to learn what's required to do it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm to old to change, is there a way to use C# that actually works?
|
|
|
|
|
My limited interest is to build, for my own device, just a little step counter. Maybe a distance metric if itβs too involved. No frills, not for distribution. Just for me.
Time is the differentiation of eternity devised by man to measure the passage of human events.
- Manly P. Hall
Mark
Just another cog in the wheel
|
|
|
|
|
I would want to develop sort of an Android version of Merlin. 
Merlin (console) - Wikipedia[^]
And a game I developed while in college.
I could also adapt my implementation of Cosmic Wimpout as well.
And... and... and... 
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, thatβd be a fun little project, too!
Time is the differentiation of eternity devised by man to measure the passage of human events.
- Manly P. Hall
Mark
Just another cog in the wheel
|
|
|
|
|
I have been writing Java code for years on Linux, Windows and Android, and heve never come across that requirement. Maybe I misunderstand what you are saying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Java, you can put the class name followed by ".*" to get access to all methods. I've been told it not as efficient some how, but I have no idea how or how reliable that source is.
Bond
Keep all things as simple as possible, but no simpler. -said someone, somewhere
|
|
|
|
|
Matt Bond wrote: I've been told it not as efficient some how,
They did not understand what they are talking about.
First it only matters during compilation. It has no impact (zero, none) when it runs. The import statement is not even in the final binary.
In the Sun/Oracle compiler compilation is done in java - it is written in java. So when it imports a class for compilation it must validate the class. The entire thing. It cannot just validate part of it.
IBM use to have a compiler that was faster (presumably not written in java.) And oddly enough more compliant with the Java Specification. But still it would had to do a simpler import process to make sure the class was compliant just to insure that it could create a compliant binary.
|
|
|
|
|
I would like it if they could make Edit 'n Continue work reliably (like it used to do in VS 2005, but never since). This is for native C++ development, in my case. YMMV
Paul Sanders.
If I had more time, I would have written a shorter letter - Blaise Pascal.
Some of my best work is in the undo buffer.
|
|
|
|
|
I can't stand edit and continue, I want it turned off. Occasionally I forget that I'm stopped at a break point and start editing and I want the IDE to tell me that, like it used to back in the gool ol' days.
|
|
|
|
|
Your grammar is normally excellent - what does this mean ?
are the BS using it thinks to I need.
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
So.. you don't start your files with an exhaustive list of all your namespace inclusions?
Or am I missing something?
I'm feel like I'm missing something here.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know about anyone else, but I definitely do not.
I mostly use the using directive for defining aliases for complex structures (e.g. Dictionaries of Lists). And for including only those Extension Methods I need for the code I'm writing. I write my Extension Methods such that I can include them granularly.
Furthermore, I put using directives inside the namespace which needs it, not in the global space.
Most of my code files contain no using directives at all, they are unnecessary, a cry for help.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, no need to make it easy for those other developers!
What did they ever do for you?
In all seriousness, the using directives support granular definitions.
So, no need to pollute the entire namespace, but it's still nice to announce your dependencies I think.
|
|
|
|
|
Say goodbye to C++, C#, Java and JavaScript and expect all programming languages and existing code to be replaced with Hexagony in a year.
GitHub - m-ender/hexagony: A two-dimensional, hexagonal programming language.[^]
(From CodeProject Daily Insider)
Obviously anyone can see this new technology will replace everything immediately.
Only question left is whether my tongue is in my left or right cheek.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
