|
I wanna see that Grand Pyrenees draped over your shoulders.
|
|
|
|
|
Chipper fabricated it with UART and LEDS. (10)
|
|
|
|
|
Don't see how it means "chipper", but ... STRIDULATE? (Anagram of IT UART LEDS)
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Yay! Anagrams are always solved!
Chipper is defined as a buzz/chirp/chirping/chirrup/tweet sound in about 50% of the English dictionaries. When solving these puzzles you should probably check multiple definition sources.
|
|
|
|
|
I have Chambers and Concise Oxford, and neither of them contains your definition. So I suspect you are actually referring to American dictionaries.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: So I suspect you are actually referring to American dictionaries
Somehow I just can't comprehend that they have dictionaries in the US.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow,
musefan wrote: Somehow I just can't comprehend that they have dictionaries in the US.
This is the first time I have ever been offended here on codeproject. That statement seems a bit over the top in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
I am sorry if I have offended you, but why would you take offence to that comment, are you the person responsible for "American English"?
My point was, Americans had a language (English) but just decided to completely ignore how words were supposed to be spelled and wrote them however they wanted. Which kind of suggests they either never had dictionaries, or didn't care to use them.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the opinion of someone who has never been able solve one (my excuse is the time difference): If the words don't appear on tiktok or FaceStuff or InstaIdiot, they should not be allowed.
I have an ethnic dictionary with all the words but they are not in alphabetic order. Takes me a while to look up OG's tomes.
If you can keep your head while those about you are losing theirs, perhaps you don't understand the situation.
|
|
|
|
|
musefan wrote: Americans had a language (English) but just decided to completely ignore how words were supposed to be spelled and wrote them however they wanted
The irony is that many of the spellings and grammar that are used in the UK date from the 18th and 19th century and those used in American English more closely resemble the common English of the 17th century; so one could argue that American English is purer than British English. However, all languages evolve; I don't think that anyone here would seriously suggest we go back to pre-Norman Conquest Anglo-Saxon or the English of Chaucer or Shakespeare (who used many variants of spellings and freely invented new words as he wrote). Even in the UK we have local dialects, lingos etc.
I like finding out about new words (both in my 'home' language and in other country's versions of the language). As we say, here, vive la différence.
The quote variously attributed to George Bernard Shaw, Oscar Wilde, and Winston Churchill sums it up nicely : We are two nations divided by a common language.
|
|
|
|
|
No doubt. I would never claim to know anything about the history of language, it really isn't an area I have any knowledge. My original comment was just a joke, and then I ended up trying to explain the joke. Although on reflection I can see how the explanation I gave is probably making it sound less like it was meant to be a joke 
The absurdity of my suggestion that they don't have dictionaries in American should have been enough to know I wasn't being serious.
|
|
|
|
|
musefan wrote: The absurdity of my suggestion that they don't have dictionaries in American should have been enough to know I wasn't being serious.
Problem is that this kind of comments are done in a serious tone too. So not having used the Joke Icon, some really obvious dumb thing or [JOKE] [/JOKE] is a bad idea (happens to me continuously)
Don't forget we are communicating through a forum, where all non-verbal information is missing. And we already know what happens if you give a computer a bit of ambiguity... don't we? 
With humans is even worse (the risk of missunderstandings / execution bugs)
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: Problem is that this kind of comments are done in a serious tone too
Well, I think that definitely is a British trait. All our jokes sound serious! 
Nelek wrote: Don't forget we are communicating through a forum, where all non-verbal information is missing. And we already know what happens if you give a computer a bit of ambiguity... don't we?
Indeed, but that applies to the listener too, not just the speaker.
Why assume bad intent is implied? If something sounds negative, clarify, and then make judgement.
|
|
|
|
|
I think that the demise of the Soapbox has led us all to be a trifle twitchy about comments in the Lounge and to read negative connotations into non-serious remarks, and our attempts to defuse perceived ire or to use humour (or should that be 'humor'  ) can back fire on us. I had realised that your 'no dictionaries in America' was intended as a joke; but some of the other comments (not yours) seemed to me (perhaps wrongly) to be getting tetchy.
|
|
|
|
|
Well this is one of the big problems with social media. People too freely miss-interpret something as negative and then never willing to listen to reason when you correct them.
I don't understand people. I don't understand how someone can be offended by words. I don't understand why you care what somebody you have never met in real life says or even thinks about you. People are illogical and I hate them all
|
|
|
|
|
musefan wrote: My point was, Americans had a language (English) but just decided to completely ignore how words were supposed to be spelled and wrote them however they wanted. Which kind of suggests they either never had dictionaries, or didn't care to use them.
That's called diacronic evolution of a language and is pretty normal, when the language is introduced in a new place. It starts evolving on its own, the more distance between the points and the more time, the bigger the differences.
Spain came to america first and the "spanish" spoken there is different enough be called differently. We specify as "Español Latino" or just "latino" in the short form.
Back to your comment again, one thing is that they ignore it, and the other (most probable cause) is that the new speakers learn it in a different way or adapt the spell of it to something that is closer what they consider a more logical graph for the sound, based on their previous langauge.
Heck, even within Spain we have regions that can't barely understand each other in the same language. And I suppose that a guy from Liverpool and a guy from Winchester are not using english in an identical way.
So... IMHO yes, your comment might get taken as a personal attack (not the best option to do, I know, but it is easyly possible), because it gives the impression that you imply "stupidity" or "deliberateness" in those changes, but those actually changes are perfectly normal.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: because it gives the impression that you imply "stupidity" or "deliberateness" in those changes
But even if I was trying to imply stupidity (which I wasn't), I would not have been implying it towards a specific person. So I do not understand how one can be offended on behalf of a non-existent group of people.
|
|
|
|
|
We all have a bad day, don't we?
I can't imagine that you ALWAYS are that quiet and can talk about everything and/or don't missunderstand any statement and/or don't get missunderstood.
Aren't you married?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: Aren't you married?
Nope!  (although I am in a relationship).
As they say, "if you are tired of loving somebody, marry them".
I get what you are saying, but it's different with people you know in person.
And I am certainly not always quiet, I am a strongly opinionated person. However, you will never insult me no matter what you say. You would do very well if you find a way to offend me... like... I couldn't even give you an example of something that would.
|
|
|
|
|
musefan wrote: However, you will never insult me no matter what you say. You would do very well if you find a way to offend me... like... I couldn't even give you an example of something that would.
I wouldn't bet But no worries... I am not going to try it (at least not on purpose)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: So I suspect you are actually referring to American dictionaries.
Possibly. The definition appears as far back as the 1797 printings of the The Imperial Dictionary of the English Language[^]
I'm curious... do you guys think codeproject is an Anglocentric website?
|
|
|
|
|
Randor wrote: The Imperial Dictionary of the English Language[^]
Published by Princeton University, so still American biased.
Randor wrote: do you guys think codeproject is an Anglocentric website?
No, but I do think the CCC clues, as well as their solutions, should avoid the use of more obscure words. There are quite a few non-native English speakers who try (and sometimes succeed) to solve them.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey,
Let's have this conversation right here out in the public. Could you be *very* specific with what you are saying?
Because it sounds like you are saying that the Daily CCC should only contain words from a British dictionary. Could you clarify that part for me?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
No, this is what I said:
Quote: I do think the CCC clues, as well as their solutions, should avoid the use of more obscure words. There are quite a few non-native English speakers who try (and sometimes succeed) to solve them.
Whether thos words are American or English biased does not matter, but they should be words that most native or non-native English speakers have come across in their daily lives. Or, could reasonably be able to figure out without the use of an 18th century dictionary.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your suggestion. I will consider your opinion when I become the next setter.
I was planning on using some Ebonics. What would be your opinion be on that?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
