|
I have named the board Deadpool as its a bit mangled but still working, with a freaking hole in it...
|
|
|
|
|
I've got them so hot that you could barely touch, but never blowed a hole in one. Good to know they'really rugged.
Someone's therapist knows all about you!
|
|
|
|
|
Left it too cool down, tried it after I had ordered another one too look busy, the little trooper was fine apart from two inputs I was using that had 24v across them. Atmels really are military spec... 
|
|
|
|
|
Good story and very cool that you lost some pins but not the entire device.
I have a similar story related to a lightning bolt.
A few months ago we had a lightning strike about 10 feet from my garage and about 25 feet from the location of my arduino bluetooth garage door opener (documented here on CP Never Buy A Garage Door Remote Again: Open Your Door With Your Android Phone (via Bluetooth)[^] ).
We lost a wifi router, a cable modem and a PS4 had to be repaired.
My garage door special has no casing or anything and it began not responding to my bluetooth signal.
I noticed that it still powered up and all that, but it didn't work.
I put it back on the bench and found that the one pin (which I output on to activate the relay) no longer worked but the rest of the chip was entirely fine. I simply changed the code to use a new pin. Swapped out the relay input wire to the new pin and everything worked again.
Those arduindos and ATMegas are great stuff. 
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Those arduindos and ATMegas are great stuff. Smile |
Darn near idiot proof! MSP430's are similar, PICs will die totally from what I did to it (trust me I know)
|
|
|
|
|
glennPattonWork wrote: PICs will die totally from what I did to it
Interesting, did not know that.
So the atmega / arduino is actually more resilient than some others.
Didn't know if it was just luck. interesting that the chip designers may have created circuits that protect better like that in the chip.
|
|
|
|
|
Possibly unfair to PIC, I remember a problems with a particular 16F658 batch kept me going for a couple of weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
I am trying to convert my VB6 code to C# (Desktop programs). I am looking for tools that will help increase my efficiency and shorten the learning curve. Any suggestions? Other than "give it up!" 
If everything seems to be going well you are obviously overlooking someone or something....
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] is the traditional method of conversion.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
|
|
|
|
|
Resharper.
And don't give it up, C# isn't terribly difficult. Like an English muffin, it just has many nooks and crannies, and is infinitely better with butter(Resharper).
I would suggest a functional clone rather than direct conversion, though. It's unlikely that a VB6 program is structured in a way that will work well in C#.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
- Benjamin Disraeli
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, I will check it out. And yes I am actually re-writing a functional clone as you suggest. Sorry I did not make that clearer. The Program is around 400,000 lines of code. 
|
|
|
|
|
No worries, just wanted to make sure you didn't end up down the rabbit hole 
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
- Benjamin Disraeli
|
|
|
|
|
Ed Aymami wrote: around 400,000 lines of code
Imagine how rewarding it will be when you can finally "select-all, delete!" the VB code 
On the other hand, you have different fingers. - Steven Wright
|
|
|
|
|
You Can Use .NET De-compiling Tools Like RedGate .NET Reflector For Simply Read Your Assembly And Translate It To Different Versions Of C#, VB.NET Or C++.NET.
I Use That Tool To Read My Students Codes And Learn Some Of Tricks They Use... 
|
|
|
|
|
Nathan Minier wrote: Resharper.
Gesundheit!
Honestly, I love that nagging thing almost as much as I do JavaScript!
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
|
|
|
|
|
Nathan Minier wrote: Resharper.
|
|
|
|
|
Nathan Minier wrote: Resharper.
Eric
|
|
|
|
|
Presumably, in a world of reuse, I am the only one concerned when I hear “rewrite”, “redesign” or “refactor”. IT staff spend an inordinate amount of time reinventing the wheel over and over rather than moving on and accomplishing something new. I suppose it maintains the inflated “need” for IT workers.
|
|
|
|
|
Or it could be that one obsolete language is architecturally incompatible with best practices in another. Crazy, I know.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
- Benjamin Disraeli
|
|
|
|
|
Unless it's less than 1000 lines of code, avoid auto-conversion software. I'd strongly recommend re-designing and then re-writing it in C#. The re-design is important because things are done way differently in modern .NET than it was during the VB6 days.
|
|
|
|
|
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, I will check it out. And yes I am actually re-writing a functional clone as you suggest. Sorry I did not make that clearer. The Program is around 400,000 lines of code.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, you'd need to re-think the database schema, what database approach to use, do you keep it as desktop or do you roll out parts of it as web apps, host it on the cloud (AWS/Azure), use SOA and componentize the application structure, using Web API wrapper layers, designing for scalability, etc. Sounds like a really fun project.
|
|
|
|
|
He isn't kidding. I would LOVE to get into a project like that!
|
|
|
|
|
Converted database schema to SqlServer years ago. The VB6 Code runs fine on SQLServer2016.
Using CodeTrigger to create the data access layers. Like it a lot.
Old men need love and respect too...
(Did not believe this when I was 25...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
