|
RossMW wrote: definitely would not be a apple.
Because others make better buttons?
In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. ~ Ronald Reagan
|
|
|
|
|
No, because I hate apple restrictive painful ecosystem.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh c'mon though surely it's not that bad - at least they threw iTunes in for free.
ducks and sprints for cover
|
|
|
|
|
Now wouldn't that suck. If you had to pay for something as bad iTunes.
Mind you, You have have to pay for root canals, so the precedent has been set...
|
|
|
|
|
Haha, lol. Funny you should mention dental work. I've had quite a year of it..
To be fair, I've had several root canals, part of my palate removed and more stitches in my mouth than I care to count.
I still dislike iTunes more. 
|
|
|
|
|
RossMW wrote: Until the damn home button starts to get a bit dodgy
Aha!
Now we see the real reason for the change!
Itoy sales are down, so they've added an incentive for suckers fanbois people to replace their old ones -- a working button!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Hold on, hold on...
They sued samsung because swipe to unlock was such a brilliant, superb, innovative invention, and they obviously Deserved to make billions for coming up with such a brilliant, superb, innovative invention... But now they've dumped it?
It can't have been worth anything, then.
I look forward to seeing samsung sue to adjust the penalty to match the brilliant, superb, innovative invention's true value.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
A couple of weeks ago, I decided to test if the allocation unit size (when formatting a disk) has any effect on the speed at which data is transferred to the disk. Note: This was on a conventional hard drive. I have not tested SSDs.
Without boring you with the test procedure, I found that:
1) Increasing the allocation unit size from the Windows default of 4096 bytes, to a higher value, like 16,384 bytes has very little effect when writing large numbers of smaller files. In fact the average amount of wasted space on the disk is around 8,192 bytes per file, whereas the average wasted space with an allocation unit of 4096 is only 2,048 bytes per file. However, there is less fragmentation of the disk with larger allocation units.
2) The larger allocation unit has a major effect on performance when transferring large files (several Gigabytes). With very large files, like system drive images (30 Gigabytes and more) the write speed to the disk increased between 30 and 40%
Conclusion: If you can dedicate a complete drive or partition to large files, like video or image files, it may be worthwhile to format that drive with a large allocation unit, like 8,192 or 16,384 bytes. Since the disk will not hold large numbers of files, the increase in wasted space per file is not important.
Note: Certain types of encryption will only work on disks with 4096 allocation units. I also suspect that increasing the allocation units on SSDs will have little or no effect, but I have not done tests on SSDs
For my tests I used a 4TB Western Digital disk drive in an old Vanteq Nexar enclosure, connected to the computer via USB3. It will probably not work in the newer line of Vanteq enclosures, as their transfer rate seems significantly slower than the old Nexars
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
modified 16-Sep-16 12:14pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Yep. And in the old days (pre-IDE era) when disks reported the real number of platters and heads they contained I would spend ages fiddling with the interleave to get the best setting for a particular processor / MB / HDD combination. You could double throughput by getting it right, so it was seriously worth it.
Ah, disks span slower in them days, I remember it well... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, that's true, size matters. The bigger the unit the larger amount of data that can be stored without fragmentation or risk of losing correct order. I'm kinda keen on 96 columns[^] per unit 
|
|
|
|
|
Hoi! Rip van Winkle! Wake up! It's 2016!
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Think I should shave? 
|
|
|
|
|
I was an 80 column by 12 rows man.
And we measured our code by the "Inches thick" or "pounds weight" scale, not this namby-pamby "lines" metric they insist on today!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Which goes to prove size does matter.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
You're banished! Banished! Banished to the Soapbox! Banished! 
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
imho, this would definitely be a good/great tip-trick.
thanks, Bill
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the upvote. I will prepare it as a tip/trick and post it. 
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I recently a joined a client, I developed beautiful concepts of my own, when I try to send some of that to use in my office to make a better product, my client doesn't allow it.
Just asking is there anyway other than Emails to be able to upload some files and download it in the office network and which is not harmful and blocked usually so that I can reuse my concepts and not follow clients standards both.
Thanks,
Abdul Aleem
"There is already enough hatred in the world lets spread love, compassion and affection."
|
|
|
|
|
Memory?
Pen and paper?
Seriously, if your client doesn't allow you to reuse code you've developed externally, then don't do it. Any "solution" we give you will only end up with you getting into trouble for circumventing their standards. Unless you can convince them to allow it, you're going to have to reinvent your concepts.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
The company does not allow you to receive e-mails from your personal e-mail.
They have security in place to prevent that which, in this day and age, is probably prudent on their part.
I would suspect they will not allow you to bring it in on a USB device either, and they shouldn't. That is a method of infecting networks.
So.. if you think you have a product they can use - ask THEM, not US, how to get the product in.
|
|
|
|
|
As Tim says, if they have locked you down to the level of preventing emails, they've probably locked you down for everything else as well. You will need to talk to them to find out if there is a "permitted way" to do it.
But...be aware that they may want (or claim) the rights to the software if it's going to be used in one of their products. And if you don't provide it, they may very well refuse to let you import it, as it leaves their products vulnerable if you leave the company for any reason. Many companies have a "developed or created while in our employ" clause in the employment contract for that very reason. Which means you may not be able to use it elsewhere after this.
Think carefully before you do this.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I know that crap in most of the cases it won't be an issue, at least from my side I wouldn't claim for that, but yeah probably in some cases people did, OK I would try to reinvent it, its time taking, I did develop very beautiful methodologies when I was preparing for the interviews.
Thanks,
Abdul Aleem
"There is already enough hatred in the world lets spread love, compassion and affection."
|
|
|
|
|
Open a Dropbox account and upload the files to your allotted space. At home or your office, download them. I suspect you can use Google for that, too.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Why not sit down with the client, explain what you are doing and how it adds value to the company. Ask their help in finding you a safe way to bring your material into the network. Perhaps they could provide you with a write only USB stick that they could scan before allowing you to use it ?
cheers, Bill
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
