|
Florian Rappl wrote: If you need something for internal projects, then GitHub is a weird choice anyway, as you could just go with, e.g., a GitLab instance, which is installed on premises
Agreed. My point was that GitHub is not an appropriate place for proprietary code, the advantage of being able to access your code from anywhere being offset by the lack of security.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, that's definitely true!
|
|
|
|
|
Git doesn't actually need a server. The only reason I can think of to use one is if you absolutely love web interfaces. Personally, I haven't found anything yet that I like better than GitExtensions, so even when I do use GitHub it's just cloud storage.
For internal projects, just clone a "public" repo to a folder on an internal server. You can easily restrict access via your existing authentication system (ActiveDirectory in our case) if that's your bag, so no need to muck about with keys for ssl or anything. Easy-peasy, and very low maintenance.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know where you read that git needs a server (no one said or implied that). The discussion was about a central web interface with the special case of GitHub. However, running git without a server is only a half-baked solution. If you have source control you also (should) want backups. Therefore syncing with one or more peers is important.
And I also don't see where your reasoning against web interfaces is coming from. Even at home I use gitweb on my RPi - its often the fastest and most convenient way to access quick information about a repository that has not been cloned or fetched yet.
|
|
|
|
|
If you needed GitHub, you would have noticed by now.
|
|
|
|
|
I often wake up thinking "Is this it? Is this all there is in life?" I'm searching for that something which I can't seem to find. At first I thought maybe I'm missing some Big-O in my life. Clearly that wasn't it. Now I'm going with GitHub 
And I don't think people quite missed electricity or cars or airplanes or computers...
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
I use Microsoft's Visual Studio Online (TFS) for source control and CodeProject and CodePlex to showcase my open source code. I find VSO invaluable - it supports both TFS and Git.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
There's other options out there besides GitHub, BitBucket for example was mentioned.
I often meet your criteria: don't need to collaborate, don't need source control, not interested in sharing the code, etc.
I still however used, for years, SVN because I wanted an offsite backup to important docs, and I am often working on my laptop somewhere, and so I'm frequently collaborating with myself, if you will.
The most important reason for using GitHub, specifically, is that in the last year, as I've poked around on occasion for contract jobs, every single potential lead has asked me for my GitHub account to see some sample code.
You may not be looking for work now, but it's a really good thing to start building your code base, your commit history, etc., for some projects you are OK with making public. In fact, my github account is now a standard part of my resume.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: my github account is now a standard part of my resume.
Good point. I've read that GitHub is the new resume in other articles too. I think I'll just create an account and see where it goes. I might even use it in the future. At least I can try it out a bit
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: At least I can try it out a bit
Enjoy!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: asked me for my GitHub account to see some sample code
I would never put up with that, and fortunately I don't need to. Nor would I give them my CP ID. If they want me to bring or send some code I will, but I wouldn't want them to see old and/or buggy code.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: Nor would I give them my CP ID
Well, my ID is public, it's easy enough to look up.
PIEBALDconsult wrote: but I wouldn't want them to see old and/or buggy code.
Personally, that's why what I post there has to meet a certain level of quality, otherwise it'll go into a private repo.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Do not ask what GitHub can do for you
Ask what you can do for GitHub
 
Life is too shor
|
|
|
|
|
What? That didn't even make sense... 
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I know. It just didn't make any sense 
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: It seems like everybody is on GitHub nowadays.
I don't, and seeing no need in near future
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Most works for governments and banks is prohibited from Git! Directives from compliance. So *everyone* uses GIT is not even close.
dev
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: I am kind of interested in what all the fuzz is about
If one develops code, anywhere, then one should consider how relevant source control and back up are. The two are not the same.
If one decides that either is prudent then one must then decide on a solution for that.
Github fulfills the need for one, and might fulfill the need for the second since one might presume that github backs up its own content. (One should however verify the second.)
In general from a professional point of view I wouldn't suggest relying only on a single business for a technical solution because businesses can and do run into trouble. But often it is sufficient to have ones content locally and then on an external source. However for a business (more that a couple of people) that probably isn't sufficient since there is data which is unlikely to be preserved on individual developer machines. That might be different when talking about a single individual however.
|
|
|
|
|
Why questions and discussions on these topics will be prevented in this forum?
Why not allow an open discussion about it also in the very details in this forum?
Why should we leave it to the underground?
My point is, the more I know about it the better I can protect myself.
Bruno
[Edit]
After 1.5h: I think all the so-called professionals do not know much about it and would like to wipe it comes under the carpet.
[/Edit]
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You could always start a discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
If you are hinting about something like this:
A person asks how to create a key logger. This person is then criticised for asking how to create something that could be used to take information from a third party without that third party's awareness.
My reasoning as to why this criticism is valid is:
Most of us with a number of years behind us -
(1) Could quite easily create key logging software.
(2) Have a number of years behind us precisely because we have not created key logging software - we would soon be out of a job and probably worse if we created key logging software.
(3) Don't relish the thought of someone relatively new, to the world of software development, using our experience to create something that is ethically wrong.
So to those people wanting help in creating key logging, or any other 'dual use', software my message is:
If you want to create key logging software go and do the research yourself, don't ask people who have no desire to help you in your potentially unethical enterprise and expect them not to be critical of your request.
[edit] I spotted a grammatical error in my post, horror of horrors!
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
modified 22-Feb-15 8:39am.
|
|
|
|
|
You just typed:GuyThiebaut wrote: If you are hinting about something like this:
A person asks how to create a key logger. This person is then criticised for asking how to create something that could be used to take information from a third party without that third party's awareness.
My reasoning as to why this criticism is valid is:
Most of us with a number of years behind us -
(1) Could quite easily create key logging software.
(2) Have a number of years behind us precisely because we have not created key logging software - we would soon be out of a job and probably worse if we created key logging software.
(3) Don't relish the thought of someone relatively, new to the world of software development, using our experience to create something that is ethically wrong.
So to those people wanting help in creating key logging, or any other 'dual use', software my message is:
If you want to create key logging software go and do the research yourself, don't ask people who have no desire to help you in your potentially unethical enterprise and expect them not to be critical of your request.
To make it go away deposit $1000 on my Swiss bank account 
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
I'll need your details first...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: To make it go away deposit $1000 on my Swiss bank account
No probs I will just claim the 1 squillion dollars I won last week, in the Nigerian lottery, and use that to pay your small amount.
I just need to find the email... now where is it... there it is... now to click on the link... here goes...
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
