|
JMK-NI wrote: part 3 this weekend
What about part 4?
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
|
JMK-NI wrote: 2027
That's it?!?
That's all we get for your second posting on the subject?!?
When's the third?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Take it as a compliment, you did such a good job with 1 & 2 that you can elicit this sort of reaction. I noticed there were a few requests for part 3, so I'd be proud of the work you have done!
With the reaction I saw in the comments I may actually work through the articles and see if I can get a handle on the MVC pile of crap.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Responding to such provocations is feeding a Troll. Better to report what you think is a pattern of "revenge downvoting," or harassment, on the Spam/Abuse forum.
« I am putting myself to the fullest possible use which is all, I think, that any conscious entity can ever hope to do » HAL (Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic computer) in "2001, A Space Odyssey"
|
|
|
|
|
Why worry about it, write part III and forget about him/her.
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.0
There's a fine line between crazy and free spirited and it's usually a prescription.
I'm currently unsupervised, I know it freaks me out too but the possibilities are endless.
|
|
|
|
|
A troll with a brand new account can not make many damage except from being annoying.
His votes have very, very low weight in the punctuation. One of them is not even being considered by the system due to deviation. Hover the mouse on the votes stats and see it yourself
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The best place to discuss this is the Article writing[^] forum. If any article has been closed inappropriately it's extremely simple to post a message their and ask for help, or to email us at submit@codeproject.com and see what's going on.
Lots of articles have links to working demos. It seems odd (and wrong) to have your article closed because of that.
I'm happy to get this sorted out for you if you wish.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
No ads. Nothing to sell. On any of my domains.
Example 1: -removed link-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lots of articles have links to working demos. It seems odd (and wrong) to have your article closed because of that.
Thank you. To clarify, the articles were updated to have demo links removed, not closed. Otherwise, we are in agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
So what would you like to do now?
I, and it seems the majority of the community, would like to see your articles back. I've gone through your tips and can't see anything that violates our submission guidelines.
I'll be happy to restore your articles for you, though it's your call. I do, however, hope to see your articles live again.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
 Excellent, thank you. Can you restore the previously unedited versions?
My apologies if I am coming off as taking it personal, but after putting effort into publishing tips and experiments, I was unsure how they would be received by the community (positive/negative). I received positive feedback.
Some of the tips have been sitting around unedited for 6-8 months with bookmarks and high marks. Then, within the last day or two,  they were suddenly edited. If it is good enough for March and May, then why edit them in November?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have no concerns. I stated what transpired and asked the community if they have had a similar experience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The articles and content were fine. Positive feedback was received with a few bookmarks. I removed the articles because someone decided that a link to show a working demo of the code somehow creates some sort of self-promotion for a page that does not contain ads and doesn't actually sell anything.
|
|
|
|
|
No it doesn't, but it also doesn't tell me very much about anything.
If it had a title that said; "Below is an example of the gallery sample from the article "image Gallery Sample XYZ" over at CodeProject" and then linked back to the article it would make for sense.
|
|
|
|
|
The link is an example that the "working demo" link isn't some way of trying to promote a particular product. Within the CP articles, I had "working demo" links to show users how the code will look when it works.
|
|
|
|
|
I gotta agree with Dave man. It was more like a code dump. I have one such article myself, and deleted the rest. I left one because because it's still something more than a quick Googling will pull up. Code dumps have their place, but not as an article.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Nice articles..
Arduino was what I wanted to do my next articles on. 
|
|
|
|
|
Well there is nothing stopping you doing your next articles on them....
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see any problem with the links you've used (although links to copies of jquery libraries on your own server would ring alarm bells, with me), but you could maybe explain things a little better.
For example, in one of the articles, you refer to "My image page with over 1000 images". That too would ring an alarm, even though it is just a page with a set of sample images.
But that's the point: had you described them as "A sample page with a set of 1000 SFW images", no bells would have rung, and no itchy trigger fingers would have done the dirty.
One way of writing it makes people think "Oh! That's helpful!", while the other can make them think "What's he up to?" (And note that you would probably react the same way yourself, if reading articles by other people.)
I would also comment that people look for articles because they don't know how to do something, so it's usually helpful to give more description of what the smarter lines of code do and the particulars of what the variables are for, but that's more to do with augmenting article-writing skills than with the topic at hand -- although lack of that kind of detail is something that we see all too often in "articles" by people with ulterior motives, so it can also ring an alarm bell.
Don't be disheartened by what happened, but do analyse it by thinking "Why would alarm bells have rung, causing people to overreact?"
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I don't mind alarm bells and feedback.. but the snooze button was hit for 6-8 months.
Some of the tips have been sitting around unedited for 6-8 months with bookmarks and high marks. Then, within the last day or two, they were suddenly edited. If it is good enough for March and May, then why edit them in November?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
