|
Actually 4 older brothers, 3 younger brothers and a younger sister.
And yes, I got away with them because we all prank each other; it was who was the best at it.
|
|
|
|
|
Poor sister - all alone...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is (V).
|
|
|
|
|
I have two stories as well:
#1: When we were kids we loved making "blowpipes". That day we hadn't any material in the house so we took a straw, some tape and needles and made a mini blowpipe. We tested it in our sister whom we sneaked up upon from behind. Did you know people can jump pretty high from a sitting position?
#2: During uni we lived with 6 people in a house and one of us was always home late (or early, because mostly it was morning) That guy was on the ground floor and me and my mate on the top floor (2d floor) Before going to bed we tied a cord to the front door attached the fire extinguisher to it, lifting it in the air and attached the entire thing via the staircase all the way up to our floor. In addition we made a "spider web" of cords in front of his door and attached that to the stair case as well. The spider web we covered in newspaper so he had more trouble figuring it out. He used his lighter to burn the rope because he couldn't find how to release the rope ( so lucky us we didn't have a fire). The fire extinguisher made a huge thump when it came down.
|
|
|
|
|
Breaking and Decorating.
It goes like this: when one of your friends goes on holiday for a week or so, you organise a team to empty his living room, and tastefully re-decorate. You then return his furniture, along with some nice items bought from a local auction, but arranged totally differently. If there is time (and the budget) do his hall as well.
If done properly, your friend is firstly confused as to if he actually lives there, and second laughed at by the police when he tries to report the "crime"... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was also this[^] - but to my mind, that's criminal damage!
|
|
|
|
|
|
But enough about my wife.
I have a brace of very fine looking dinners.
There will be a casserole tomorrow, but for tonight I shall roast one off.
Of course one mustn't waste anything, so the bones and stuff will be the basis of a game stock for the casserole.
Off to the Xmas Feed now, but unfortunately too much work for me to drink the rest of the day away so I suspect I shall be back here for a few more hours 
Still, I got my pay rise, so happy days.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote:
But enough about my wife.
There will be a casserole tomorrow, but for tonight I shall roast one off. |
Exactly how many wives have you actually got since you can afford to roast one? 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
modified 17-Dec-13 12:28pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I will have NONE if she reads that post! 
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Not if you roast her either... 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
Is now the wrong time for a 'spit-roast' reference?
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
It's never the wrong time for a spit-roast[^] reference. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote: I will have be NONE if she reads that post!
FTFY
|
|
|
|
|
Are there avian inhabitants remaining in Bedfordshire? 
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
What is better for developer, if UX designer give them fireworks file or photoshop file?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Depends.
Did you get matches as well?
|
|
|
|
|
If you're just working off the designer's "vision", then either is fine. If you're contributing to the design, then Fireworks is easier, but it's worth spending a bit of time getting used to using Photoshop - this is time that you won't have wasted.
|
|
|
|
|
That will depend massively on what is being developed, and the technology in use.
You can always deliver both, that way you're not limiting options.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
AndyInUK wrote: fireworks or photoshop
Fire-flames
|
|
|
|
|
The better not to take nothing from designers - they are dangerous people...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is (V).
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: not to take nothing
So what shall it be now?
Make up your mind!
Cheers!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
Fireworks, because it can automatically generate .CSS, and Images files for HTML from the actual design. Saving tones of time (Specially when you are required to reiterate through the process).
|
|
|
|
|
You're assuming that he's creating a website. That's not necessarily the case. Plus, you can do this directly in Photoshop as of CS6[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: <layer>You're assuming that he's creating a website. That's not necessarily the case.
You are right. d'oh
But if I have a choice then I would go with Fireworks, because it's primary purpose is to create UX and Prototypes. The design changes can be implemented much more faster using Fireworks.
On the other hand, there are lot more talent and resources available for Photoshop when compared with anything else.
Also nice to know that Photoshop can export to .CSS, Thanks.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
