|
 Good luck!
|
|
|
|
|
Best of luck. The SO used to smoke and quit for me, I hated the smell/taste when I kissed her. She had a bit of a lapse recently because her dad passed, but that is understandable given the circumstances.
She would tell you that the craving never goes away and that she plans to have one as soon as I am in the ground. Plus she might have a cigar when we get married.
Her advice is take it a day at a time and have an important reason to quit.
|
|
|
|
|
Are there any other habits you think to quit?
|
|
|
|
|
I got an e-cigarette thing that you fill with liquid that it nebulises.
Got down to zero nicotine in no time, and with no stress.
Of course, they've been excluded from the US, because they're harmful to Philip Morris' profits.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: they've been excluded from the US
e-cigs have been around for a while now, and growing in popularity.
Mark_Wallace wrote: because they're harmful to taxes.
Common sense is admitting there is cause and effect and that you can exert some control over what you understand.
|
|
|
|
|
I got the same a few months ago. Unfortunately, after using it for nearly 6 months, I went back to smoking a pack a day (which is my usual). I guess I got tired trying different flavors that fits my tastebuds, and I was always seeking that high feeling that vaping was unable to provide. Another problem I'm having with it I think is that as I vape longer, there's this urge to make the PV produce more vapor, which results to more nicotine being inhaled in the lungs. It's good to hear though that vaping worked for you.
Mark_Wallace wrote: Of course, they've been excluded from the US, because they're harmful to Philip Morris' profits.
A bit similar here. The health department warns people on using e cigarettes because of the assumed harmful chemicals in it. But they're not even doing their research, which makes their claims bollocks. And yeah, at least here, I can assume that the government's actions against e cigarettes can be attributed to the taxes being paid by those tobacco companies.
Signature construction in progress. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Damn you have the perfect signature - CBadger
|
|
|
|
|
GOOD FOR YOU!
I quit January 1, 1991, cold turkey from a pack-and-a-half a day habit. It's almost the smartest thing I've ever done.
(the smartest was when I started running a year later)
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just ignore him.
Do not respond to him, do not start new threads dedicated to him, do not even hint at his existence.
“I believe that there is an equality to all humanity. We all suck.” Bill Hicks
|
|
|
|
|
Who are you talking about? 
I am sitting here with my shotgun ready to catch me some trolls and you say i must ignore?
I could never do that sir! I will shoot the troll myself instead of ignoring him ![Jig | [Dance]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/jig.gif)
The damage left behind reads Message Automatically Removed
Loading signature...
. . . Please Wait . . .
|
|
|
|
|
Rule number one of FightClub... ooh wait
|
|
|
|
|
Rule 3 of fight club... 
Loading signature...
. . . Please Wait . . .
|
|
|
|
|
My maths may be wrong but I believe it has 62^15 permutations of user names given its current pattern.
26 characters lower case and upper case(=52), 10 digits and 15 characters.
So we just need to be patient... very patient...
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
Hold my underwear and check this move!
Loading signature...
. . . Please Wait . . .
|
|
|
|
|
Ya gotta double tap 'em.
...
...
...wait, that might be zombies.
|
|
|
|
|
O sh!t you are right!
Let me get the double barrel shotgun...
But wait, how to kill a undead troll...
...
Say hello to my double barrel flame machine gun!!! ![Badger | [badger,badger,badger,badger...]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/badger.gif)
Loading signature...
. . . Please Wait . . .
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder if there was ever such a dedicated troll that was able to get banned more than 20 times in 24hours until now...
|
|
|
|
|
He is an idiot for just keeping his name and changing the number, but definitely committed!
All I see is Message is Automatically Removed 
Loading signature...
. . . Please Wait . . .
|
|
|
|
|
CBadger wrote: He is an idiot for just keeping his name and changing the number, but definitely committed!
Hardly. He's managed to wind up a large number of regulars with minimal effort. You have to wonder why they bother replying.
|
|
|
|
|
On a ship we would call it mutiny, but the logic behind it is quite simple. Ignoring won't help (reason it is called a troll after all). Doing a hard wipe of any name resembling his name being registered in the next day or so will just not be able to create. Then you just get help from those not in on it to just keep turning the tables (as it seems to be going)
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: He's managed to wind up a large number of regulars with minimal effort.
Well they are regulars for a reason, I would not make anything of it. Best to do is to put a block in the system for the next 24H if any message whatsoever gets written/published or what ever with certain keywords in it, just doesn't get publish but instead just cleared as if there is something wrong with the system. Once the rush is passed and the storm has calmed there would be no more wind up regulars 
Loading signature...
. . . Please Wait . . .
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: You have to wonder why they bother replying.
Entertainment.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
It is more entertaining seeing the troll than reading about this and that in certain peoples' lives (I won't mention any names.) 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I certainly haven't followed the happenings in the lounge lately (to much drivel) but the only interaction I've seen between you and "the contraction" is where you refused to give him your email. Did I miss anything important?
Politicians are always realistically manoeuvering for the next election. They are obsolete as fundamental problem-solvers.
Buckminster Fuller
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Badger | [badger,badger,badger,badger...]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/badger.gif)
