|
I wanted to drop the topic, but you are really taking my patience to the limit. On the other hand, that from all what I have written you the only thing you percieve is
Rick_Bishop wrote: You don't have a blog. That's all you needed to say. is just wow, really wow...
As it would make a difference to the topic of the plagiarism or all what I have told you.
Rick_Bishop wrote: Feel free to downvote more of my previously written, unrelated posts to make yourself feel better about that statement. There are more than 8 million active users in this site... what makes you think that I am downvoting your previous posts? I am not hiding in any moment. I didn't downvote you. I reported you, there is a big difference.
If you don't believe it... it is your call. I don't care.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, there isn't enough content in some of my snippets, after you take out the reference info. That's valid. I didn't write it to make it wordy, I posted it to hopefully be useful. All of those pages are programatically generated by parsing the comments out of the .sql files, so there isn't going to be much actual content, but I don't need submit everything.
In setting my RSS feed up for CodeProject, I'm basically submitting all of my work for anyone and everyone to download and misappropriate as they see fit. If it were not for codeproject I would only include short descriptions in my RSS feeds.
|
|
|
|
|
I see he still hasn't apologised for the unwarranted abuse he directed at you.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I have no problem believing you didn't deliberately plagiarize the material. However, as explained in CodeProject Plagiarism FAQ, the site has a clear policy what should be considered as plagiarized. Based on the content that was originally in moderation, for me it seemed to lack proper referencing and enough original content as explained in the FAQ.
Putting that aside, why not make modifications to the texts, add some content, and ensure that site policy is met. After doing this, re-publish the results. I believe that with a relatively small amount of changes you can successfully publish articles that benefit us all.
|
|
|
|
|
Wendelius wrote: Based on the content that was originally in moderation, for me it seemed to lack proper referencing and enough original content as explained in the FAQ. For future cases... even having the links in place... he would have failed the CodeProject Plagiarism FAQ - Not enough original content[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, that's what I tried to point out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At a guess, rep points. Hence: "Abusive/Trolling"
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
indian company girls diljit kaur - Professional Profile[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer terminated.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
The whole post was this as a solution to a 2012 question:
<code><>&<a href=""></a><a href=""></a>[<a href="" target="_blank">^</a>]</code>
News Blog Page
From this brand new member: Member 14001653 - Professional Profile[^]
I'm suspecting a spam tester, but it could just be an idiot. Either way, I rejected it ... your thoughts?
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm going for eejit. The first line is exactly what you'd get from clicking var thru [^] above the answer box.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
He really doesn't want to do his homework: Member 14001301 - Professional Profile[^]
So provided you do his whole project tonight, he'll pay you well ... well, he'll pay you £30, anyway.
So he's lazy, stupid, has no grasp of timescales, and doesn't know how much software consultancy costs ... it's enough to make you want to hand it over in person, that.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
modified 29-Sep-18 6:14am.
|
|
|
|
|
Fake passports: ieltsdocs - Professional Profile[^]
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
modified 29-Sep-18 6:15am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined today, first post, site driving to his video site ona 2010 question: JustinJack - Professional Profile[^]
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food deliveries: Member 13991552 - Professional Profile[^]
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
modified 28-Sep-18 9:36am.
|
|
|
|
|