|
Good afternoon.
I was wondering if there is a more efficient way to write this code:
if (cboSP_Site.SelectedIndex == -1 && inttmpSP != -1)
{
WebBrowser1.GoBack();
}
else if (cboWS.SelectedIndex == -1 && inttmpWS != -1)
{
WebBrowser1.GoBack();
}
else if (cboFolder.SelectedIndex == -1 && inttmpF != -1)
{
WebBrowser1.GoBack();
}
I want to call the WebBrowser1.GoBack(); once if possible.
Thank you, WHEELS
|
|
|
|
|
Wheels012 wrote:
I want to call the WebBrowser1.GoBack(); once if possible.
Do nested If
if (cboSP_Site.SelectedIndex == -1)
{
if (inttmSP != -1 || inttmpWS != -1 || inttmpF != -1)
WebBrowser1.GoBack();
}
I hope i did it correctly
|
|
|
|
|
Saksida Bojan wrote: I hope i did it correctly
Not really. Every letter counts here.
|
|
|
|
|
there are many ways to get what you want, here is one:
if ((cboSP_Site.SelectedIndex == -1 && inttmpSP != -1) ||
(cboWS.SelectedIndex == -1 && inttmpWS != -1) ||
(cboFolder.SelectedIndex == -1 && inttmpF != -1)) {
WebBrowser1.GoBack();
}
and another one:
bool goBack=false;
if (cboSP_Site.SelectedIndex == -1 && inttmpSP != -1) goBack=true;
else if (cboWS.SelectedIndex == -1 && inttmpWS != -1) goBack=true;
else if (cboFolder.SelectedIndex == -1 && inttmpF != -1)) goBack=true;
if (goBack) WebBrowser1.GoBack();
BTW: here the "else" keywords are optional
modified on Monday, November 30, 2009 4:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you Luc.
if ((cboSP_Site.SelectedIndex == -1 && inttmpSP != -1) ||
(cboWS.SelectedIndex == -1 && inttmpWS != -1) ||
(cboFolder.SelectedIndex == -1 && inttmpF != -1)) {
WebBrowser1.GoBack();
}
Is what I am looking for. A little slow today.
WHEELS
|
|
|
|
|
5 years from now, you'll probably be scratching your head over what this code does. At the risk of being chastised for writing more code, I suggest you amend the code to:
bool itemDeleted = (cboSP_Site.SelectedIndex == -1 && inttmpSP != -1) ||
(cboWS.SelectedIndex == -1 && inttmpWS != -1) ||
(cboFolder.SelectedIndex == -1 && inttmpF != -1);
if (itemDeleted) {
WebBrowser1.GoBack();
}/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
|
that's why I offered some alternatives, you pick whichever you like most.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you ravi. Good code. WHEELS
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a split container control that will allow the user the ability to resize the control during the applications runtime environment. And will allow for more than 2 split panels. As the SplitContainer control I can only see it allowing 2 containers. I need at least 3 or 4 containers to be resizable. Without having to next the containers inside each other.
|
|
|
|
|
AFAIK nesting SplitContainers is the normal approach.
The alternative could be a TableLayoutPanel, but then IMO you have to organize the resizing handles and everything yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, That is what I figured  .. As that was the only way I could get it to work and drop the margins to maximize used space.
Quick question though... On this control how to you fix 1 of the partitions sizes to a minimum size. Here is what I tried but it is not working.
if (scRPTFilter1.Panel2.Height != 275)
{
scRPTFilter1.Panel2.Height = 275;
}
if (scRPTFilter1.Panel2.Width != 557)
{
scRPTFilter1.Panel2.Width = 557;
}
I was thinking I needed to say something like
if (scRPTFilter1.Panel2.Height != 275)
{
scRPTFilter1.Panel2.Height = new size(275, scrptfilter1.panel2.width);
}
Just Not Sure since the height is separated here.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
1.
Control.Height and Control.Width are existing properties, you can get and set them.
Control.Size is also a property, you can get and set it, however setting it requires a new Size, it does not make sense to set either Control.Size.Height or Control.Size.Width, since that will change the H or W of the copied size, not the Control's actual Size.
2.
I haven't done such things with SplitContainer (I used it only once), it probably works just fine.
3.
If you want to enforce a minimum W or H, you should test for < and not for equality, otherwise you can't change it at all.
|
|
|
|
|
I just need to know how to enforce 1 panel's minimum size.
|
|
|
|
|
well, try if (pan.Width<minWidth) pan.Width=minWidth; and similar for height inside its Resize, SplitterMoving and/or SplitterMoved handler. And/or read up on those events.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
A colleague and I came across this same problem and made a control derived from TableLayoutPanel, implementing the MouseDown, MouseMove and MouseUp events. It works reasonably well, except for designer support - we have to add all the controls via code.
Dybs
The shout of progress is not "Eureka!" it's "Strange... that's not what i expected". - peterchen
|
|
|
|
|
Hi friends,
I need to fix a part of .cs code and recompile and publish a project into production, but when i build it, it shows below error: can anyone give me some suggestion? what might be the cause? do I need to check my development environment?  many thanks...
------ Build started: Project: Z:\scor_ip\, Configuration: Debug .NET ------
Pre-compiling Web Site
Z:\scor_ip\Global.asax(1): Publication (web): Request for the permission of type 'System.Web.AspNetHostingPermission, System, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089' failed.
Pre-compilation Complete
------ Skipped Publish: Project Z:\scor_ip\, Configuration: Debug .NET ------
========== Build: 0 succeeded or up-to-date, 1 failed, 0 skipped ==========
========== Publish: 0 succeeded, 0 failed, 1 skipped ==========
|
|
|
|
|
Suggestion 0: Next time give your question a more useful subject.
Suggestion 1: Questions like this are more likely to get better answers on the ASP .Net forum.
In answer to your question:
alexyxj wrote: Request for the permission of type 'System.Web.AspNetHostingPermission
This means exactly what it says: You don't have permission to host an ASP .Net website. This often means you are trying to run the website from an untrusted location.
The drive letter Z suggests you might be trying to run it off of a mapped network drive. These are usualy untrusted locations. Try copying the whole project to somewhere on your local hard drive and trying again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello. Until now I always used conversion through Convert class. Example:
Int32 nInt = Convert.ToInt32("12345");
With that above I always used Try Catch to handle incorrect conversion. Lately I saw there can be achieved by using Int32.TryParse().
So which approach should be better, and what are good and cons of each method?
Thanks in Advance
|
|
|
|
|
Don't use Convert when other options exist. Convert's methods generally just call the other methods anyway -- like Parse.
TryParse is generally better than Parse when available.
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't that other way around? I think that Int32.TryParse uses Convert class and handles exception within
|
|
|
|
|
No, and I mispoke somewhat, both Convert.Toint32 ( string ) and Int32.Parse ( string ) call System.Number.ParseInt32(String s, NumberStyles style, NumberFormatInfo info)
System.FormatException: Input string was not in a correct format.
at System.Number.StringToNumber(String str, NumberStyles options, NumberBuffer& number, NumberFormatInfo info, Boolean parseDecimal)
at System.Number.ParseInt32(String s, NumberStyles style, NumberFormatInfo info)
at System.Convert.ToInt32(String value)
at Template.Template.Main(String[] args)
System.FormatException: Input string was not in a correct format.
at System.Number.StringToNumber(String str, NumberStyles options, NumberBuffer& number, NumberFormatInfo info, Boolean parseDecimal)
at System.Number.ParseInt32(String s, NumberStyles style, NumberFormatInfo info)
at System.Int32.Parse(String s)
at Template.Template.Main(String[] args)
I would expect Int32.TryParse to also call ParseInt32.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It seems I Prefer using Convert.ToInt32 instead Int32.TryParse
With try parse I need to convert initial value to String, while convert accept other types
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
