C#

protected ITest(string val)
{
    // Do common stuff relevant to the abstract class
    // This can be empty if you want to force derived classes
    // to implement it.
}

Florian Storck wrote:

Is there any possibility for defining abstract constructors ?

Florian Storck wrote:

do you have a certain style for naming abstract classes (probably ATest, I guess ).

Image img = Image.FromFile("c:\\mybitmap.bmp")<br />
img.Save("C:\\mybitmap_copy.bmp")

Are you disposing the connection object and DataAdapter object as well?

What happens when you open and dispose a bunch of datasets, does the memory size of the exe keep going up?

how vital enterprise application are for proactive organizations <br>leveraging collective synergy to think outside the box and formulate their key objectives into a win-win game plan with a quality-driven approach that <br>focuses on empowering key players to drive-up their core competencies and increase expectations with an all-around initiative to drive up the <br>bottom-line. But of course, that's all a "high level" overview of things
--thedailywtf 3/21/06

switch(a){
case q:
case y:
    ...
    break;
}

public class SingletonClass
{
    SingletonClass instance;

    private SingletonClass()
    {
        // Initialization code
    }

    public static SingletonClass GetInstance()
    {
        if (instance = null)
            instance = new SingletonClass();
        
        return instance;
    }
}