|
The simplest way is to put your "bits of code" as functions
switch( blah )
{
case 0:
FunctionA();
break;
case 1:
FunctionA();
break;
case 2:
FunctionB();
break;
}
etc
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
Can some one tell what is the right algorithm to use Encrypt any files in C# and that need to be decrypted in Java by using key ? Show me some samples if you have..
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
As long as you are using algorithms that both platforms understand, then there shouldn't be a problem. You could use SHA-1 for example.
Regards
Sebastian
|
|
|
|
|
you can try bouncycastle[^]
you can use any algorithms you like
dhaim
ing ngarso sung tulodho, ing madyo mangun karso, tut wuri handayani. "Ki Hajar Dewantoro"
in the front line gave a lead, in the middle line build goodwill, in the behind give power support
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
here is code line
Process.Start(@"C:\test.exe", @"C:\Temp Dir\sequence.seq");
the thing is the second string, because it has space in the directory name
the test.exe failes to open the file
i've changed the location to : C:\sequence.seq and it works fine
so it's not the file problem
how can i handle the sapce in the string??
thanks 
Have Fun
Never forget it
|
|
|
|
|
Wrap it in quotes;
Process.Start(@"C:\test.exe", "\"C:\\Temp Dir\\sequence.seq\"");
Enjoy
I are troll
|
|
|
|
|
|
how can i get out from the outer for in a for-for-if situation.
For example
for...
{
for...
{
if...
{
break;
}
}
}
The break only breaks from the inner for, i want it to break from the outer for too.
Could you help.
|
|
|
|
|
you have to break it twice or use goto
for (int a = 0; a < 5; a++)
{
MessageBox.Show(a.ToString());
goto LoopBroke;
}
LoopBroke:
MessageBox.Show("Loop completed");
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Continue[^] also only breaks a single loop. You could add a flag called 'done', check this in the outer loop, and do a second break if it's true. Or, you use a goto[^].
Disclaimer: the goto suggestion should not be taken seriously
I are troll
|
|
|
|
|
You can't (See the reply from XMen)
You could consider restructuring the loop to use a while loop instead. You might find if you structure it differently that you don't need the break.
Simon
|
|
|
|
|
I suggest you go for the goto suggestion. While goto is discouraged, I find it helpful sometimes. It may even simplify the code more than what another structure would do. In this case, IMHO, it will (depending on the context too). A go to will not cost you an extra boolean value and saves an extra if statement.
Eslam Afifi
|
|
|
|
|
Your question shows that you have a misunderstanding of what a for loop actually does. I cringe whenever I see people use break statements inside for loops because it shows they've just gone for convenience without actually considering what they are trying to do.
A for loop is used to iterate a predictable and set number of times; that's what it's for (pardon the pun). If you need to iterate an indeterminate number of times, then you should consider using a boolean based loop structure, i.e. while ... do or do ... while instead (and yes - I know that a for loop is boolean based in that the exit condition is satisfied when you reach the to value in the count). Then, your logic makes more sense because you've based your exit on the condition you're testing.
Please, consider redoing your looping mechanism to a one that's a better fit. Whenever I see people recommending break or goto statements, I know that they are being lazy or have given no thought to what the proper use of the loop should be.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've looked really hard, but I can't find a '6' button anywhere, so unfortunately I'm only going to be able to vote you a 5. Sorry about that.
Fantastic.
Simon
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: I know that they are being lazy or have given no thought to what the proper use of the loop should be.
Well well well, first of all I'm not lazy... and by reading your answer, people will thing .Net Framework developer were fool because they made 'break'. Perhaps the programmers they use 'continue' are lazy too.
Now, take an example...you need to iterate an array until you got a value hmm... 9. Now how you gonna do
for (int a=0; a < arrayx.Length; a++)
{
if (arrayx[a] == 9)
break;
}
or
bool foundNine = false;
int index = 0;
while(!foundNine)
{
if (arrayx[index] == 9)
foundNine = true;
index++;
}
I'll always prefer the first one...I dunno about you, it may look you a work of lazy coder.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Xmen wrote: Well well well, first of I'm not lazy
Perhaps not, but you aren't thinking about proper use of language constructs - hence my original comment.
int index = 0;
while (arrayx[index++] != 9)
{
}That's how you'd do your example - now, you can justify yourself as long as you like but you are promoting a bad practice. Now, let's extend your sample to see why it's bad practice.
bool foundNine = false;
for (int i = 0; i < array.length; i++)
{
if (array[i] == 9)
{
foundNine = true;
break;
}
}
if (foundNine && SomeOtherCondition())
{
DoSomething(array[i]);
}Contrast this with:
int index = 0;
bool foundNine = false;
do
{
if (array[index] == 9)
{
foundNine = true;
}
else
{
index++;
}
} while (!foundNine);
if (foundNine && SomeOtherCondition())
{
DoSomething(array[index]);
}I don't know about you, but this doesn't feel like such a horrible hack.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys
|
|
|
|
|
aha nice done...but 'break' isnt worthless
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
All I ask is that you've considered the alternatives and given some thought to them - there are few absolute rules in programming, but it is important that you can actually justify why you've used a particular construct.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: All I ask is that you've considered the alternatives and given some thought to them
nope you didnt.
"I cringe whenever I see people use break statements inside for loops because it shows they've just gone for convenience without actually considering what they are trying to do."
"Whenever I see people recommending break or goto statements, I know that they are being lazy or have given no thought to what the proper use of the loop should be."
plus you did unfair, you change the while loop to good one but messed up the for loop
here is mine
bool foundNine = false;
int i = 0
for (; i < array.length; i++)
{
if (array[i] == 9)
{
foundNine = true;
break;
}
}
if (foundNine && SomeOtherCondition())
{
DoSomething(array[i]);
}
still better than while
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
No it's not. You've now introduced obscurity for maintenance coding. Where's i declared in your loop? Outside - that's where. Your example is now even more confusing, and I'd rip your code apart in a code review if you did that while working for me.
You're not going to convince me that you can come up with a decent reason to ignore the fact that a while loop wouldn't be a better fit here, and it's obvious to me that you aren't willing to consider that your coding practice could possibly be less accurate, so I'm going to break off this discussion now before it becomes he said/she said.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: You've now introduced obscurity for maintenance coding.
I think it's harder to write maintainable code than to write working code. Most of us on this forum work mostly toward the working code.
..and then move on to the next project. Maintenance of the code wasn't (isn't?) a priority in school, and I made a lot of mistakes before my code became even close to being 'readable', let alone easy to maintain.
Where does one learn such things, except by trial and error? 
I are troll
|
|
|
|
|
hi every body
i want know how can i change the audio sample rate and sample size in wave file
Ex: i have audio files with sample size 16bit
and i want to change it to 8 bit
how can i do this
thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
I've created a new setup project with Visual Studio 2008 inside my solution and added my .EXE files to the setup.
Then I've created to each .EXE a shortcut and moved it to the user's Program Menu. There I'm able to set the Icons property to an external icon.
Problem: The file and path have always to exist. If I move my solution to another computer, I'm always getting an error of missing icon file.
The Icons itself are stored in the Resources of each project inside this solution and connected to the Application Icon property.
Is it possible to use these resource icons or include them into the setup project ?
If yes, let me know how ? If no, let me also know 
|
|
|
|
|
Can we catch(or overload the event handler) the (Yes, No, Cancel) button click events of Microsoft Excel when the user clicks the Close(X) button on the top right corner of the ms excel workbook? Am basically building an excel automation add-in to ms excel using c#.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
