|
I missed something in your code, namely dataType: "json". So you would be getting a json object by the $.ajax method rather then a string.
Are you receiving the alert for 'worked', if not you might want to add the error: function(){...} method, I don't seem to be able to find the 'failure' option in the $.ajax documentation, so this is probably never being called even if it fails.
|
|
|
|
|
 Hello to all ...
I am very basic on this of javascript, so someone could help me how to resolve this issue.
I have a javascript (HTML internal), which fetches and executes a file in another web address...
but I do not want it to do that, i want this script to execute is function directly from my local disk (file location).
Here is the script;
<html><br />
<head></head><br />
<body><br />
<div style="WIDTH: 984px; HEIGHT: 443px" ><pre><script type="text/javascript"><br />
var previewConfigs = [{<br />
type: 'flash',<br />
preview_url: "http://myflashtest.com/files/9083/preview.swf",<br />
base: "http://myflashtest/files/9083/"<br />
}];<br />
</script></pre><span id="large_item_preview"><br />
<object style="visibility: visible; Z-INDEX: 0; WIDTH: 590px; HEIGHT: 300px; TOP: -51px; LEFT: -27px; " id="large_item_preview_container" data="srcs-ff/preview.swf"></object> </span><br />
<script type="text/javascript" src="srcs-ff/jquery.js"><br />
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript" src="srcs-ff/preview.js"><br />
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><br />
if (typeof(previewConfigs) !== 'undefined') {<br />
for (var i = 0; i < previewConfigs.length; i += 1) {<br />
var preview = new ItemPreview(previewConfigs[i]);<br />
preview.display();<br />
};<br />
};<br />
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><br />
$(document).ready(function() {<br />
$("tr[data-accessor=source]").click();<br />
});<br />
</script><br />
</div><br />
</body><br />
</html>
What I want is to change this part;;
preview_url: "http://myflashtest.com/files/9083/preview.swf",
base: "http://myflashtest/files/9083/"
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
your SWF must support local play.
Some SWF going online - programmers add that in SWF.
And: Maybe SWF check host of SWF too.
http://livedocs.adobe.com/flash/9.0/main/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm?context=LiveDocs_Parts&file=00001079.html
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/flash/system/Security.html
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/164/tn_16494.html
|
|
|
|
|
i have a form in which i am entering country code and zip code.
user should have to enter 4 numbers in country textbox after 4 numbers country textbox should not take any number.
please reply..........
|
|
|
|
|
The TextBox has a "MaxLength" attribute. It does exactly what you want.
|
|
|
|
|
That won't quite do it. The OP said NUMBERS. Your solutions will only limit the length but still allow any character to be entered.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
Ok then, I missed the "numbers" part of the question. But then this can easily be taken into account by adding a compare validator that checks for the type.
|
|
|
|
|
No, a compare validator works by comparing the value of one field to another. It, or any validator, also does not prevent characters from being entered when only numbers are expected. Validators check the input afterward, they don't prevent entry.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
Ok I agree on the second part. However, a compare validator can be used to check for data types
<asp:CompareValidator ID="" ControlToValidate="" Operator="DataTypeCheck" Type="Integer" runat="server" ErrorMessage="Must be Int"></asp:CompareValidator>
|
|
|
|
|
Once again, this is after the fact. It does not prevent entry. Thanks for playing.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
In which I said that you were right.
What I was replying to was the first part of your statement "No, a compare validator works by comparing the value of one field to another"
|
|
|
|
|
Using a masked edit texbox you can restrict the input to a specific lenght and type. Search for the term and you will find many examples from custom server controls to JavaScript solutions. Pick one that will work for you.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
You can use the MaxLength attribute of the textbox to limit the lengh to 4 and use this function to limit the input to only numbers. If you want to restrict entry of invalid characters, you'll have to handle the keypress event and write appropriate code.
function isNumeric(str)
{
var i=0;
for(i=0;i<str.length;i++)
{
if(str.charAt(i) < '0' || str.charAt(i) > '9')
return false;
}
return true;
}
|
|
|
|
|
There are far better examples and implementations than this.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
I understand, but for a starter, this should be okay.
Moreover, by redirecting new users to pre-written frameworks and controls, we're actually discouraging them from learning the language itself.
|
|
|
|
|
Shameel wrote: we're actually discouraging them from learning the language itself.
No.
.NET is a pre-written framework, has it discouraged you from learning? JQuery is a framework, have you stopped learning JavaScript?
Lazy coders may not want to learn any further than how to use an API but true developers will learn and better themselves. Expereinced developers also know to not recreate the wheel, if there is a perfectly good framework or control to do what is needed they will use it and save the time for more complex problems.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Nischalke wrote: Expereinced developers also know to not recreate the wheel, if there is a
perfectly good framework or control to do what is needed they will use it and
save the time for more complex problems.
Correct. But the OP doesn't seem to be an experienced guy. So, let him learn the language first.
|
|
|
|
|
Inexperienced will not take the time for in-depth learning. Most employers don't pay for training or to have their devs learn something, they want results.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all
I have a .swf file in a page of my site that has big size.
I want use a javascript code before loading this .swf file, as loading bar.
I don't want this loading bar code be used for all page of my site, I want after my site loaded, and just for this ,swf file, loading bar works.
If javascript can does this for me?
Thanks,
Nima
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Flash runs thru flash runtime. Interfcae may be html and Javascript.
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/415/tn_4150.html
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplayer/articles/swfobject.html
|
|
|
|
|
This function is executed at Ie it will not run in Firefox. Nobody can oblige me in this area
var panel = document.getElementById('Panelbar');
for (var i = 0; i < panel.rows.length; i++) {
if (i % 2 != 0)
panel.rows[i].style.display = 'none';
}
_obj.nextSibling.style.display = "block";
|
|
|
|
|
I can infer from this code that you are trying to hide even rows from a table. A little debugging can help you. Why don't you try putting alerts at various places to find out if the various pieces of code are really executed or not.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi guys
I am creating some radio buttons at run time and also declaring its java script checked function,
and providing it the name parameter coming from my entity's name property , but problem is this name
contains such characters which generates client side error while creating radio button and its event , I cannot correct the data as my client needs these characters in their names , is there any way to solve this problem ?
regards,
Tauseef A Khan
MCP Dotnet framework 2.0.
|
|
|
|
|
What characters are those? Can you show some code? Why don't you strip those characters from the name? And why does your client dictate what names you should give to your UI elements? It is none of his business.
|
|
|
|
|
no ,client does not dictate my control names,for examle
i have a class
{
string id;
string name;
}
so while creating radio button at run time to its radioncheck event i am passing
name as parameter , so if name contains some invalid characters (which i cannot strip out)
so java script fails to create radion button at run time.
Tauseef A Khan
MCP Dotnet framework 2.0.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
