|
If it can't connect to an existing network, my guess would be that your motherboard's NIC
a) doesn't support your router's features
b) is misconfigured
c) does have the (latest) motherboard drivers loaded
d) is defective (entirely possible).
Without a lot more info regarding your router and NIC configuration, that's the best I can offer.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
hai friends,
one of my friends (electronics guy) had the following doubt. since iam a software person, i could understand nothing out of it. and i thought that, this forum attracts the professionals, who can answer this question.
the reply would be more appreciable and helps him a lot in his career.
his mail is as follows.
We need to add three more instructions for a microprocessor i.e., I33 and I17 and I9 to the existing design. the instructions I33, I17 and I9 regquired 33, 17 and 9 CPU cycles to execute individually. For example, a 32-bit restoring division takes 32+1 cycles to produce the right result, this is the motivation behind I33. Our task is to add the instructions, I33, I17, I9 to the existing design. The new design shall handle multi-cycle controls and using ROM for storing the micro-program. The divider control signals can be "straw ones".
|
|
|
|
|
and the question is...
--
If you view money as inherently evil, I view it as my duty to assist in making you more virtuous.
|
|
|
|
|
Our task is to add the instructions, I33, I17, I9 to the existing design. The new design shall handle multi-cycle controls and using ROM for storing the micro-program. The divider control signals can be "straw ones".
may be this one.
|
|
|
|
|
If you're asking about how to design hardware you're on the wrong board. I don't have a clue where you should be posting, but CP is a software development forum. This subforum is for issues with setting up hardware for deploying apps or for interfacing with hardware programmatically. You might see if the IC design software you're using has a support forum.
--
If you view money as inherently evil, I view it as my duty to assist in making you more virtuous.
|
|
|
|
|
I see
but i have googled regarding the hardware design forums but in vain.
thank's for the reply.
|
|
|
|
|
Where's the "existing design"? The statement of the problem doesn't make any sense without the necessary background information. Anyway, this looks suspiciously like a homework problem. If you have a specific question you can ask it, but don't ask us to do your work for you.
|
|
|
|
|
This is certainly not a homework question,
but this came from one of my friends who is already working in a company.
please refer to my original post.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello guys.
I have a hard disk (40 gig) but now the problem is that it only shows 3 gigs of the space.How do I recover the remaining 37 gigs.I checked the partition and I cudnt see any.
Thank you in advance.
kagiso
|
|
|
|
|
try withdraw all switchers and plug your new hdd to pc
|
|
|
|
|
I have.All other hard drives work fine on my machine and Ive taken this to work.I hve it connected at work now as we speak.
I checked the partitions and even had it formatted, but still nothing shows up.
Anything else.Thanx in advance guys.
kagiso
|
|
|
|
|
Delete all of the existing partitions and start over.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
There was no partitions,but I did that anyways till it said not recognized and made another partition which is the same as the one I had initially.
Ive tried to recover using some software aswell but still nothing changes.
Ive tried formating the partition and rebooting and still nothing happens.
kagiso
|
|
|
|
|
Some disk drives have jumpers to configure them for smaller sizes, to get around problems with compatibility with older systems. It might be possible to look up the drive model number on the manufacturer's website.
Having said that, I think there was a limit to 32GB but I don't recall one at 3GB. I think it's most likely that the drive is junk.
DoEvents : Generating unexpected recursion since 1991
|
|
|
|
|
Thats wat Im thinking.
Thanx for all ur help guys.Much appreciated.
kagiso
|
|
|
|
|
...AND some stickers are labeled overhead. I experienced that last week - took me 30 min. to figure that out
greets
Torsten
|
|
|
|
|
hey, does anyone known how to set up a network using windows xp?
i would like to set up a home network however I'm not sure what hardware i need, i have an ethenet cable and my house has wireless internet which all the computers in the house connect to. I would like to be able to access files and folders on other computers in the house, this would save time moving files from computers via cds.
Thanks in advance
Benjamin Dodd
|
|
|
|
|
Benjamin, some of this you will learn during your BTEC course. However, I will send something to you via the CodeProject e-mail link.
modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
For those folks reading this later in the archives, you can e mail your files to yourself too in case you arent CD-RW savvy. Limited to the size your e mail provider allows unless you know how to split files, folders, programs, movies, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a desktop that is connected to my wireless router via LAN cable (router has 4 LAN sockets).
Also have an Epson R300 printer currently connected to desktop via USB.
To print from my laptop I have to have the Desktop turned on.
What I want to do is be able to just turn printer on and print from lappy without using Desktop PC.
I see lots of wireless print servers for sale but I was wondering if I can just get something that can connect the Wireless Router to the Printer, cutting out the Desktop.
I am not overly good with machinery so am not at all sure if this is possible.
Thanks
I still remember having to write your own code in FORTRAN rather than be a cut and paste merchant being pampered by colour coded Intellisense - ahh proper programming - those were the days
|
|
|
|
|
If the printer has an ethernet socket you will be able to connect to the router and print in that way.
Doing this would entail setting up a wireless network - which all I can suggest is that you google this area, as wireless networks are notorious for being either really easy or really hard to set up.
Why not install the printer on your laptop and just plug the usb cable into your laptop?
You always pass failure on the way to success.
|
|
|
|
|
Unless your network has a ethernet port, you have to use a print server. I use a Keyspan PS-4 - it supports up to four USB (2.0) printers.
It seems to work fine under windows, but there's no Linux support.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
My boss reported good results with a Netgear WGPS606. We've just bought one for the office, although we're actually only using it as a wireless bridge for our Ethernet-capable printer after relocating it to a location that doesn't have ready wired access.
Come to think of it though I think you're asking for a wired print server[^].
DoEvents : Generating unexpected recursion since 1991
|
|
|
|
|
HI
I am a college student doing an ICT course which involves a unit on hardware.
When i was starting the course i heard some comments about what was better, AMD or Intel. So i was just wondering what people on here thought.
Is an Intel processor better than an AMD processor or does it depend on the users needs?
thanks for reading
-- modified at 7:08 Monday 1st October, 2007
AMD vs Intel
Both Intel and AMD offer a wide range of CPUs. The two companies' products are in direct competition and are both capable of running any current PC software. The differences are in technical details that, although they may be used for marketing, don't necessarily mean much to the end user.
Pricing is also very competitive, with AMD's products being generally cheaper than comparable Intel models. At the budget end of the market, Intel's offering is the Celeron which is a cut-down version of the Pentium 4. AMD's budget processor, the Duron, is still available although it's getting harder to find.
In the mainstream desktop market it's Intel's Pentium 4 versus AMD's Athlon XP and Athlon 64. The chief difference between the two is that the Pentium 4 and Athlon XP are 32bit CPUs, while the Athlon 64 is a 64bit model (see later on for an explanation).
Just recently both companies have launched new ranges of processors, Intel with the Extreme Edition of the Pentium 4, an expensive model for the hardcore gaming market, and a new version of the Pentium 4 processor. You might see this referred to as Prescott to differentiate it from the previous Northwood version. The technical differences aren't huge, but the pricing hasn't changed for models at the same clock speed. So if you're given a choice, ask for the Prescott models.
AMD has also introduced the Athlon 64 FX range, a high-end gaming/workstation CPU that prompted Intel to launch the Pentium 4 Extreme Edition.
Benjamin Dodd
|
|
|
|
|
Is that a BND course you are doing?
Your college library should have many books you can borrow. See if they can lend you
PC Hardware in a Nutshell, 3rd Edition
by Robert Bruce Thompson; Barbara Fritchman Thompson. Publisher: O'Reilly. Pub Date: July 2003. ISBN: 0-596-00513-X
modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|