|
Check this[^] out, the code is in vb.net but should be easy to do the same thing in c#.
- Kannan
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks anyway, i just found the answer few mins ago.
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to make an app use the xp style controls with the additional .manifest file?
1001111111011101111100111100101011110011110100101110010011010010 Sonork | 100.21142 | TheEclypse
|
|
|
|
|
|
i thought so to, but couldnt find it - using that search is sometimes like looking for a needle in a haystack.
1001111111011101111100111100101011110011110100101110010011010010 Sonork | 100.21142 | TheEclypse
|
|
|
|
|
No, but you can follow these instructions[^] and make the manifest and embedded resource.
I don't know whether it's just the light but I swear the database server gives me dirty looks everytime I wander past.
-Chris Maunder
Microsoft has reinvented the wheel, this time they made it round.
-Peterchen on VS.NET
|
|
|
|
|
An even more complete version than the one David linked to:
http://www.codeproject.com/csharp/dotnetvisualstyles.asp[^]
The difference coming in when you are using signed assemblies (since modifying the exe's resources will invalidate the assembly hash the .NET loader will have problems)
James
"It is self repeating, of unknown pattern"
Data - Star Trek: The Next Generation
|
|
|
|
|
I just found this. But in VS.NET 2003 and .NET Framework v1.1 all you have to do is call Application.EnableVisualStyles(); How spiffy is that?
Found it here:http://radio.weblogs.com/0117167/2002/12/25.html#a20[^]
I don't know whether it's just the light but I swear the database server gives me dirty looks everytime I wander past.
-Chris Maunder
Microsoft has reinvented the wheel, this time they made it round.
-Peterchen on VS.NET
|
|
|
|
|
but im using vs.net 2002 and .net 1.0
1001111111011101111100111100101011110011110100101110010011010010 Sonork | 100.21142 | TheEclypse
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, right. Sorry Nnamdi... I have to remember that you aren't as fortunate as some of us.;P Although, I was sort of talking to James, since I know that he does have VS.NET 2003.
I don't know whether it's just the light but I swear the database server gives me dirty looks everytime I wander past.
-Chris Maunder
Microsoft has reinvented the wheel, this time they made it round.
-Peterchen on VS.NET
|
|
|
|
|
|
I need to get the names of all the default colours in .NET - how would i go about doing that.
1001111111011101111100111100101011110011110100101110010011010010 Sonork | 100.21142 | TheEclypse
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot leppie
1001111111011101111100111100101011110011110100101110010011010010 Sonork | 100.21142 | TheEclypse
|
|
|
|
|
Or even:
string[] GetAllColorNames()
{
return Enum.GetNames(typeof(KnownColor));
}
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't you just hate it when that happens? So aggravating.
I don't know whether it's just the light but I swear the database server gives me dirty looks everytime I wander past.
-Chris Maunder
Microsoft has reinvented the wheel, this time they made it round.
-Peterchen on VS.NET
|
|
|
|
|
|
The only problem with Remoting is the lack of any really good explanatory material on it. I've only seen one book that just goes into Remoting. I've thought about getting it. It's from Microsoft Press, and it's called .NET Remoting (Great Title! )
BTW, do you use Reflector[^]? It's always saved me a lot of time when looking at a new namespace...or working with old ones for that matter.
I don't know whether it's just the light but I swear the database server gives me dirty looks everytime I wander past.
-Chris Maunder
Microsoft has reinvented the wheel, this time they made it round.
-Peterchen on VS.NET
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm searching for a .net (preferable written in c#) library which handles ID3V2. I've already found some good ones for ID3V1 but not for ID3V2...
Any help would be highly apreciated
Martin Leonhartsberger
mleonhartsberger@gmx.de
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks!
Although I also need write support, it's better than nothing...
Somehow i can't belive that nobody has written a complete library until now...
Martin Leonhartsberger
mleonhartsberger@a1.net
|
|
|
|
|
|
true, but i believe that changes between those versions are somewhat minor, or else they would have named it 3.x. (of course i could be wrong about this )
I just think, if someone has written a complete library for reading, if the whole structure is already there (and it is, judging from the 2 versions mentioned above), it can't be too hard to implement writing?
Just my thoughts
|
|
|
|