|
You can find the Productivity Power Tools from within Visual Studio 2013: open Tools/Extensions and Updates/OnLine/Visual Studio Gallery and you can search for it, or scroll around to find it.
“I speak in a poem of the ancient food of heroes: humiliation, unhappiness, discord. Those things are given to us to transform, so that we may make from the miserable circumstances of our lives things that are eternal, or aspire to be so.” Jorge Luis Borges
|
|
|
|
|
I tried Google but didn't get all-in-one(or I'll have to re-search Google again later)
Any handy tool for following things(with password settings)?
Enable/Disable
-USB ports(for pendrives/external harddisks)
-CD/DVD
-Internet
Frankly I don't have any valuable data in my laptop but want to prevent my brother/friends disks which comes with viruses mostly.
|
|
|
|
|
You do not need any tool to do that. Just create a separate normal user for yourself 'YourName', and then create one more user with admin rights 'Admin'.
Now Login with Admin user and change the group policy for normal users. Done.
See here[^] or here[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Actually I'm looking for handy tool for those things. If there's no 'all-in-one' tool then I'll try to create one by C# but at the same time I don't to re-invent the wheel.
|
|
|
|
|
As far as i know,there is no "All in one" tool for this requirements.You can get 1 & 2 from one tool( eg.Desktop central 8) and the 3 as separate one
To learn all there is to know. I know I'll be disappointed one day, but I've made a good start, and the eventual disappointment is likely to be brief.
-Roger Wright
Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.-Margaret Mead
|
|
|
|
|
Easy! Just don't create or store data.
|
|
|
|
|
there is USBreadWriteProtect tool,you can google it,it's free..
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
for a professional application, I am looking for a tool that is able to:
- monitor user defined paths for file changes
- monitor registry changes of defined registry folders
- log the fact that a change has taken place, and by which process (for example: test.ini modified by notepad.exe)
- log a short diff report (this is the point that I really found no real solution for... i.e. show what was actually changed in a file and create a diff-report like Windiff oder KDiff)
I already found tools like FileSpy on sourceforge which can do part of what I need, but no tool which is capable of doing them all.
Any suggestions where to look at? Preferrably free software, but if the tool is good, it may also be commercial software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I guess process explorer from SysInternal can help.
|
|
|
|
|
file monitoring: Disk Monitor[^]
registry monitoring: Process Monitor[^]
Decrease the belief in God, and you increase the numbers of those who wish to play at being God by being “society’s supervisors,” who deny the existence of divine standards, but are very serious about imposing their own standards on society.-Neal A. Maxwell
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did you forget about the details? Or is later "more late"?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It's in draft. Besides only recently I have started to practice animation & I thought it'd better if I post that after some output(animation). So please wait.
thatrajaCode converters | Education Needed
No thanks, I am all stocked up. - Luc Pattyn
When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is - Henry Minute
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any tutorials or posts for a Multiuser chat application, vue database or something? such as the program skype but not as good as skype? with login and register.
I dont know if this is the right place to post sorry, im very new to codeproject.
|
|
|
|
|
If you had read the text above you would realise that it is obviously not the right place. And if you had posted your question into Google you would have some useful information to get started with.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
First a little background. We have started using Git where I work, so I was directed to use it rather than my seeking Git out. I do development at work on Windows and at Home on a MacBook. I have been doing development for a number of years (multiple decades in fact) and have used most Revision Control and Version Control tools at one point or another. Now for why I believe Git is broken.
Git's UI sucks
Please note that I said UI, not GUI. Although many people have issues with command line interfaces, I prefer them. Git's CLI is poor, because the way Git models changes for the user is poor. A great deal of the internal structure is shared with the user. If this where simply window dressing that would be only annoying. Those interested could look and the rest of us could ignore those details. Unfortunately, Git requires that you pay attention to those details and sometimes that you edit the repository just to accomplish your day to day work as a developer. I expect that a release manager or build engineer will need to get into the details of how the source code is being versioned, but a developer should not be expected to pay attention to these details.
Bit's Merging is Broken
The flow that we use is Fetch and Rebase. When I rebase I expect Git to make at least one mistake while fast forwarding the changes. I am usually not disappointed. So for a group of say 10 commits there will typically be one or two mistakes in those commits. These are not flagged as conflicts. Git is confident in its ability to make these changes. And it is wrong.
Git uses the wrong Vocabulary
In my opinion words do not matter except for the shared definitions. It is not important that the color orange be called orange, but rather that we all agree that the banner at the top of this page is orange. From that perspective there is no justification for redefining/repurposing words that have a well know well understood meaning. In some cases (checkout) the confusion is not terrible and may just be an evolution because the tool works differently. In other cases (reset) it is misleading to the user. It is uncalled.
Git Requires Extra Steps
I have heard this called the Git Tax. What used to be one or two steps (check in, and possibly merge) has become several steps (commit, fetch, rebase, possibly merge, push). Of course the easiest to forget to do is the push. This is the least annoying of these issues, but given that Git provide no advantage to me (in my opinion and for my use case) this is nothing but cost.
In Closing
I have written this largely to get it out of my head. I do not expect that this will diminish Git's popularity. I don't really expect any change from this at all. Still I assume that there are other's like me out there who may be gratified to know that they are not alone in there reaction to Git.
Let the flames commence.
Tanks for your support
Pat O
<a href="http://currentchaos.blogspot.com/">Blog</a>
_ _ _
|
|
|
|
|
pdohara wrote: I have written this largely to get it out of my head. So why not choose the correct forum?
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
I assume that you believe this is not the correct forum, but as you did not offer an alternative I can only guess at your intention.
Tanks for your support
Pat O
<a href="http://currentchaos.blogspot.com/">Blog</a>
_ _ _
|
|
|
|
|
pdohara wrote: I can only guess at your intention. Well you could start by reading the text at the top and see why it is the wrong one. Then you could try some of the others to see which one is appropriate.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
So again reading between the lines you are saying that you do not see this as a review of Git? Or perhaps you do not see Git as a free tool?
Tanks for your support
Pat O
<a href="http://currentchaos.blogspot.com/">Blog</a>
_ _ _
|
|
|
|
|
pdohara wrote: you do not see this as a review of Git No, it's just you ranting because you don't like it; at least that's how it reads. You say it's broken and yet there are people using it all over the world. If you really believe it's broken then I would expect http://git-scm.com/community[^] to be the place to report it.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: No, it's just you ranting because you don't like it;
In what way does this not count as a review? I don't like Git because it does not do what it is intended to do well. My use of the term 'Broken' is hyperbole, and quite a bit tamer than the brain damage quote that is commonly used to describe people who don't see Git as the next great thing. If you disagree with one of my points then I am interested, but it appears that you are "just ranting because you don't like it;"
I was pretty clear that I did not expect to sway popular opinion on Git. For myself I do not see the attraction when perfectly good alternative exist like Mercurial. If you like Git, obviously you are welcome to use it. Again if you disagree with my points I am interested in hearing about it. If on the other hand you don't think people should say bad things about Git then this is not an appropriate forum for you.
Tanks for your support
Pat O
<a href="http://currentchaos.blogspot.com/">Blog</a>
_ _ _
|
|
|
|
|
pdohara wrote: Let the flames commence
And which other system is not broken and is perfect?
My problem with Git is that it doesn't support multiple independent deliverables within a single repository. Other than that it is neither significantly worse nor significantly better than anything else.
|
|
|
|