|
What other environment can I use for MFC development?
/Gywox
|
|
|
|
|
NT4.
I still have to code for it. 
-------------------------------
DEBUGGING : Removing the needles from the haystack.
|
|
|
|
|
VC++ 5, VC++ 4 and older versions 
|
|
|
|
|
PWB, programmers workbench 
Blogless
|
|
|
|
|
After trying to use PWB (a verrrrry long time ago), I find it hard to believe anyone ever built anything with it. It was a monster PITA.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Pocket PC/Windows CE 
|
|
|
|
|
me too using eVC++ 3.0 and eVC++ 4.0 compilers.
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't linux possible using grashopper??
John
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can I use backcolor on datagrid when I MouseMove on it ?
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't you hear? VB6 will stop working at the end of the year; attempting to use it will cause your hard drive to melt into a large puddle. 
Seriously though you might want to consult the proper forms.
Visual Basic / VB.NET[^]
-------------------------------
DEBUGGING : Removing the needles from the haystack.
|
|
|
|
|
vongkham wrote:
Can I use backcolor on datagrid when I MouseMove on it ?
What made you post this on the poll forum? 
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote:
What made you post this on the poll forum?
 The guy is a VB user, doesn't that tell you something?
Blogless
|
|
|
|
|
norm.net wrote:
The guy is a VB user, doesn't that tell you something?
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - W.Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Especially people still on Visual Stduio 6.0, there can't be may positions requiring this still any more ?
Blogless
|
|
|
|
|
It's still the best for MFC (that's what the poll is about). In VS.Net they really screwed up the resource editor and that feature is important for MFC development.
|
|
|
|
|
ed welch wrote:
In VS.Net they really screwed up the resource editor and that feature is important for MFC development.
Yeah, that's my biggest gripe about Visual Studio 2003, still lets hope this has been addressed in next version. 
Blogless
|
|
|
|
|
norm.net wrote:
still lets hope this has been addressed in next version.
You make me laugh... LOLOLOL
------- sig starts
"I've heard some drivers saying, 'We're going too fast here...'. If you're not here to race, go the hell home - don't come here and grumble about going too fast. Why don't you tie a kerosene rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
You make me laugh... LOLOLOL
Yeah you're probably right, and pigs might fly outta my butt.
Blogless
|
|
|
|
|
|
In my opinion they screwed up the whole gui. I find it soo much easier coding with vc6 + WndTabs[^]. But I admit I do use VC7.1 for remote debugging which is much improved in the new version.
John
|
|
|
|
|
norm.net wrote:
Especially people still on Visual Stduio 6.0, there can't be may positions requiring this still any more ?
Yeah, specially considering that the VC++ 6 compiler is far from standards compliant.
|
|
|
|
|
This is actually the main reason why I still use VC6. I have 500K lines of code that is vc6 compatible but will take a lot of work to get it to run under VC.NET.
John
|
|
|
|
|
You'd be surprised. A friend of mine works for a major American financial company and they are still using VS6 on W2K. They have yet to roll out XP and their programmers can only dream about using VS2003! Bummer.
The Rob Blog
Google Talk: robert.caldecott
|
|
|
|
|
I've even heard prople working NT4.0, with VS6.0, still these situtations are rare.
Blogless
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Rose | [Rose]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
