|
Rohan Leuva wrote: assure that there is no infinite loop in the code
That's impossible. See the Halting Problem[^]
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Anecdote told by a Stanford University CS Prof:
In the early days of computing, there was a chip-making company that advertised: "Our processors are so fast that they can run an infinite loop in 2.5 minutes".
Well, that was true in a sense, since in 2 minutes and 30 seconds, the chip would develop such intense heat that it would burn itself out
|
|
|
|
|
I have not trusted self driving cars since reading Stranger in a Strange Land and RAH points out that there will be more than just the dangers of the road. It would have to have proof against remote take-over.
<sig notetoself="think of a better signature">
<first>Jim</first> <last>Meadors</last>
</sig>
|
|
|
|
|
The safe way is the best way to live.
If you've never failed... You've never lived...
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting combination of comment and signature...
|
|
|
|
|
always
If you've never failed... You've never lived...
|
|
|
|