|
And the fact of the matter is you got way too upset over me calling you a rookie. A non-rookie would've defended their point with substance. But no, you chose to flip out. And now you're upset with me because I returned the favor. Like I said, you dish it but you can't take it.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
And this reply is just to see if a third one pisses you off even more. 
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not flipping out (yet), but you are and have been. This is reaching the level of harassment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This thread is about stating opinions, not writing dissertations. I don't owe you any explanations, although I already said why I think MySQL/PHP/RoR are popular.
Sorry if my opinion is different from yours, but why don't you just state yours instead of attacking mine?
|
|
|
|
|
StatementTerminator wrote: Sorry if my opinion is different from yours, but why don't you just state yours instead of attacking mine?
You attacked the MySQL camp. If you can't take the heat then stop dishing it out.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
StatementTerminator wrote: Sorry if my opinion is different from yours, but why don't you just state yours instead of attacking mine?
I'll even quote it...
Quote: Things like RoR and MySQL look like children's toys by comparison.
Nice blanket statement there. Rookies use blanket statements like that.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Terminator, I only replied because you made the "children's toy" comment. These technologies are not children's toys, they're big boys toys for developers who really know how to use them properly.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, what I said was they are like children's toys by comparison. I could list some reasons why I think SQL Server is superior to MySQL, but what's the point? It would just start a flame war.
Saying something mildly insulting about a technology is not a personal attack on everyone who uses that technology, and it doesn't justify personal attacks in response.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like MS paid you off.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
To which I will probably reply: "Objective? C".
--
The trouble with people,
is that they want to hear only what they want to hear.
|
|
|
|
|
Coming from Objective-C to Xamarin/C#, I feel the opposite. With embedded C background, Objective-C was much easier for me to get used to than C#, which I dislike with a passion. And the Xamarin IDE... 
|
|
|
|
|
I have used many language in my programing career, buut as an Electronic Ingeneer I cannot give my back to C and his genial evolve C++. It's fast to programming, fast to run, and I can programme some microcontrollers with it, so C++.
|
|
|
|
|
I.e. most liked would be as if I could choose any language under the sun without any repercussions like co-workers not able to understand it.
If most used, then I'd say C#. Most liked (as in most fun for me) isn't listed there, it would definitely be some sort of Lisp (possibly Clojure if I had to use the JVM, or Scheme if doing DotNet, or Common Lisp if environment doesn't play a role). A second would be Haskell.
|
|
|
|
|
Only one vote. Who has voted? Please reply with the fun part of Objective C. 
___ ___ ___
|__ |_| |\ | | |_| \ /
__| | | | \| |__| | | /
|
|
|
|
|
it is just as fun as C#, Java, VB, C/C++ or Javascript.
|
|
|
|
|
Why no Objective C?
It's fun to work with Objective C. I like the syntax very much, it's different from all the C++ and C# stuff i had to do all the day at work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, because you can avoid Objective-C
|
|
|
|
|
You've obviously never used DXL[^] - JavaScript and ObjC are paragons of beauty, grace and elegance in comparison...
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
CodeProject MVP for 2010 - who'd'a thunk it!
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know what Rational DOORS are, and I think I'm glad. 
|
|
|
|
|
I hate JavaScript. It shouldn't even be on the list.
|
|
|
|
|
JavaScript: The worst parts of all your favourite languages, together at last.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
