|
Hi, be advised that if a non-compete agreement is too broad that it will not be enforceable in court. So if you do sign it...They will not be able to enforce it.
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: Did you ever get asked to work for a client on their conditions?
It is the case with all government related customers... All big-money or full-of-self-importance customers I know of has this initial behavior, like they do not buy the product but you...
As story of my wife: They got a job with one of those customers (GOV). After they signed the customer told them, that they can not paint the product themselves, because there is a 'code' and they don't want to waste time on approving their facility, so they have to hand over the product for paint to an approved 3rd party - wife told them thay can go and f**** themselves - the painting is one of their trade secret...
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
It happens here with the Automotive industry, sort of. Suppliers can make a lot of money if they get a contract, but have to agree to strict SLAs and timelines for deliveries. Big fines are involved if the are late / can't supply and make the factory line stop.
|
|
|
|
|
I talk them out of fixed bids and tell then to do hourly. I give an "end of day" status report and expect to always deliver something every few days. They can cancel anytime they feel there's no progress. They never do (in my case). Of course, you can cancel any time too (in writing).
Bottom line, keep them interested / motivated with updates and a stream of deliverables: scope document; design documents; prototypes; etc. The only thing you might regret is your quoted rate when they rave about you.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Have you ever had them take advantage of you.
Keep what you wrote, not pay the last 1-2 invoices?
I let my clients know that I build in termination code. If they terminate early, the programs are not expected to work after that. Because I withhold about 30% of the invoice until the client is satisfied all of the conditions were met and/or they are able to use it.
If they claim that they can't use it, the termination code is no big deal. I've got screwed once when a partner needed to approve the invoice (because it was large), he was out of town, etc. The second invoice showed up, and a lot more progress was made... I was too trusting. They said they could not use it, and packed things in.
90+ days later... I got the call about an error message (in software they did not finish paying for, that they found unusable, and were supposedly just trying to demo it to see if they could use it, I told them I would have to show up, and repair the files, which would likely lose the DEMO data... Then the truth came out... I made them wait until the check cleared! I should have tacked on a punishment fee!)
Now I am much more picky about who I do work for.
|
|
|
|
|
If you need them as a new client... you will need to clarify a lot.
If you do well without them... keep going, this might end being a big headache and your mental sanity is worthier than the bill they might pay you.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Evil dealings of Ian Apple? (12)
[clue] What kind of apple? [/clue]
@OriginalGriff - two points about the rules on your member page...
Your link to the Terrorgraph's "how to" page now hits a paywall.
Also, the time seems to have crept from 0900 UTC to 0900 London time.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
modified 26-Jul-21 7:04am.
|
|
|
|
|
Time fixed - I moved it to "London time" since most of us have to deal with summer time / daylight savings. That way it's pretty much the same time relative to the "working day".
Which link to Terrorgraph? Got it. Yes, they added one a year or more back. I'll see if I can find a non-paywall version ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Don't think the linkiness survived copy/paste...
Normal CCC rules apply: How to solve cryptic crosswords[^] <<<<=====
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Turning off Javascript seems to "break" the paywall for me on the Telegraph site. (I used to be a subscriber though which may have some bearing).
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: pretty much the same time relative to the "working day".
Just as well I'm retired - there's now a two hour seasonal shift for me, instead of one. 
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
machinations (anagram of Ian MacIntosh)
|
|
|
|
|
Yep! YUAT. I was getting scared of the three strikes rule...
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Peter_in_2780 wrote: [clue] What kind of apple? [/clue]
Laxton's Superb, Bramley, Cox's Orange Pippin? Take your pick.
|
|
|
|
|
From what I have seen so far, the centered start menu in win 11 will no longer allow custom grouping, only a group of "pinned" apps but not freely organized.
I think this is a huge step back.
How is your current win10 start menu organized? do you use the customization features it offers or do you ignore most of the features?
To see what I mean, here's my start menu.
Start menu[^]
How about yours?
|
|
|
|
|
Mine looks and acts like Windows 7 - I have always hated the Win 10 menu/blocks/tiles.
Open-Shell is your friend.
Start menu[^]
So old that I did my first coding in octal via switches on a DEC PDP 8
|
|
|
|
|
I do not use the tiles at all (the totally hidden) and almost never the menu itself...
I use RocketDock to access my applications...
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
I also despise the tiles and blocky look. I've been using Classic Start Menu. Apparently the hooks to replace the start menu have been removed? I sure hope someone finds a workaround.
|
|
|
|
|
Classic start menu here too. I want a menu that's concise and that I can organise myself. I'm colour blind so coloured icons don't really do it for me.
What really irks me is that when installing Office, I have to rename all of the links so that I can access them with a keystroke; it's no good when every sodding link starts with the word "Microsoft". But "Word", "Excel", "Access" - just tap W, E or A on the keyboard and you're away. You'd think someone in the Windows team would have quietly taken someone in the Office team aside and had a gentle word in their ear.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: Apparently the hooks to replace the start menu have been removed?
My guess as to why is that they want to show ads on the start menu, and they don't want you to be able to avoid them.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
The what?  "Pinned apps"? What?
|
|
|
|
|
++ for OpenShell, Rocket Dock and/or Winstep Nexus Dock. I've hated all the Start Menus since Win7.
|
|
|
|
|
if google'd all three of them... never heard of any of these and from the screenshots i saw this is almost exactly the opposite of what i want windows to be.
No, thanks.
But thank you for naming them - as I said - never heard of these and I am always interested in seeing something new.
But those... nope. Not for me.
If I want something like MacOS i would USE MacOS. Apple-free-zone here.
Fruits and electricity are no good partners. Only exceptions are potatoes and lemons.
|
|
|
|
|
I can't use the STL in my IoT projects because it's not really all there and/or properly implemented on a lot of platforms, particularly those covered by the Arduino framework.
To that end, I've developed some basic data structures because I needed them. Just simple stuff, like a linked list and a hash table/dictionary. Everything works except for the dictionary's enumerator/iterator.
For the life of me I can't track down why I'm getting fed a bad (non-null) pointer and I'm about ready to give up on it to the point where I want to rewrite the whole thing.
There is another option. I can simply not have an enumerator/iterator. That would be reasonable considering I probably won't need one for the project I built this for in mind.
But I can't bring myself to do it. It just seems intolerably incomplete to me. What kind of container can't be enumerated/iterated (aside from some multithreaded containers which have good reasons not to), so I'm still hammering away at it.
Is this ridiculous? Enumeration/iteration is a core part of any container, and I'd feel really shady releasing this upon the world without one, but maybe that's just me. What do you think?
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Leave it out.
Enumeration/iteration is a core part of any container
Is it actually? It's a core part of linear containers at least. You're not enumerating dictionaries in this project and that is not entirely a coincidence: dictionaries are often not enumerated. That's a useful thing to be able to do, don't get me wrong, it's just not the primary thing they're used for.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
