|
Well, today I just found my first big massive hate in Win10.
The onedrive implementation........online only files are now not accessible through the file explorer and you have to get them via a browser.
I hope 'they' realise the error of their ways and put it back to how it should be!
modified 1-Sep-15 11:26am.
|
|
|
|
|
Please don't send me bad vibes about WinTen, I have upgraded today and I have yert to fripple any prgeeds. 
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
No, I happy with the upgrade so far!
Just some of the forms are a bit naff and find it better to switch into the full control panel dialogs than use some of the overly simplified UI.
|
|
|
|
|
There's a fix for this coming through in the next couple of months - it's available to insiders soon.
|
|
|
|
|
I did read that somewhere when trying to work out wtf was going on...
You how long 'soon' can mean though! 
|
|
|
|
|
El Capitan?
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
Don't worry, they will fix that. In windows 12. 
Common sense is admitting there is cause and effect and that you can exert some control over what you understand.
|
|
|
|
|
That's gotta be the first time that anyone's suggested it would be a good thing to have one's head in the cloud!
|
|
|
|
|
Ahem - isn't that kinda-sorta-the-point for online-only files?
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly, that's what I want!
I have my home PC that the user files/documents etc. are fully sync to onedrive.
My laptop, I do not want any sync from cloud to laptop. I just want to access them online only like I can used to do in Windows8.1
|
|
|
|
|
At least you can use OneDrive at all. I had to disable it because of some bug where it keeps resetting permissions on my Pictures and Documents folders so they become read-only...
|
|
|
|
|
Go-go (Cherokees, Lonesome Dove, and German Subs)
=================================================
Go to the source control freak of nature trail of tears on my pillow talk it to the devil's food not bombs away down yonder Boots are made for walkin' the floor over you know where you can go
|
|
|
|
|
I just got the following email. The entire body of the email is an image:
Here>[^]
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
A seemingly .gov link, quite convincing 
Beauty cannot be defined by abscissas and ordinates; neither are circles and ellipses created by their geometrical formulas.
Carl von Clausewitz
Source
|
|
|
|
|
What happens when you click on the links?
|
|
|
|
|
I'll forward it to you.. You let me know OK?
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing one would think; pictures cannot contain links. And yes, great way to prevent your mail from being checked on keywords.
So, I'd guess that the entire picture points to the same link
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
If you pay me $3.995 I will make sure that you receive no such crap ever. Pay me before midnight EST and you will get a $1.000 refund and a free bumper sticker:
I SAY NO TO SCAMMERS !
Life is too shor
|
|
|
|
|
I am willing to do this same work for only $7,995 USD and I guarantee a larger refund of $1,500 and bumper sticker plus a small yard sign.
|
|
|
|
|
According to the email (image), they have given you at least four opportunities to have a bad day.
|
|
|
|
|
Reminds me of something about 22 years ago, on a Unix terminal at a University:
A mischievous student had written a program which looked exactly like the login screen; when someone logged in, it would capture the username and password, and store them secretly, then give a 'wrong username/password' error message, and then display the actual login screen. The student would think that he had initially entered the password wrongly.
It was heard that writing such a program on a Unix terminal really required a very good knowledge of Unix internals, and we also heard that this student was dismissed from the University, and immediately hired by a computer security company.
Faintly remember that this is termed as masquerading.
|
|
|
|
|
Overnight spAmazon sent no fewer than 3 identical emails nagging me to update the CC I am using for my single Subscribe and Save order (a program that lets me get something sent at a fixed interval in turn for a discount - presumably because it lets them use cheaper shipping) because it will expire at the end of next month. 3 emails on the same subject in <6 hours would be excessive in any case; but adding extra elephants to the fail is that the card in question is an Amazon rewards card; and the bank behind it hasn't sent me a new card yet.
Based on past experience with the bank, I expect to get the new card in a few weeks. OTOH the timing of when this card was scheduled to expire is strongly suggestive that it was motivated by the first phase deadline for switching over to a chip card; which means that any snafu in that pipeline could delay it. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday spAmazon made me walk 5 miles to receive my package, and I got two identical emails (along with promotions as usual) stating the delay.
Beauty cannot be defined by abscissas and ordinates; neither are circles and ellipses created by their geometrical formulas.
Carl von Clausewitz
Source
|
|
|
|
|
Today Amazon had the postperson hand me a brand new waterproof hat a full 3 days ahead of the expected delivery date.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
