|
Quote: Real men code with edlin.
oh yeah!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
sure !
I've use edlin on MS-DOS, e on OS/2, etc... but in the 80' 
now, Notepad++ fits to my needs
If there is no solution, there is no problem !
|
|
|
|
|
No, real mean code in binary with toggle switches...
|
|
|
|
|
I remember toggling in the bootstrap loader on the front panel of many a PDP-11. One time I must have toggled in the bootstrap loader on a particular PDP-11 at least a half dozen times with it failing to boot each time before I realized the system disk was still sitting on the table next to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicholas Marty wrote: Intellisense is all the documentation that I need.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
"proper" and "annoying" respectively.
The only instant messaging I do involves my middle finger.
|
|
|
|
|
Like showing the ring finger instead of the middle finger
|
|
|
|
|
Annoingly Excel or .NET...
|
|
|
|
|
Ying and Yang 
The signature is in building process.. Please wait...
|
|
|
|
|
Yin and Yang 
|
|
|
|
|
|
The spelling is inbalanced? That seems fundamentally wrong..
|
|
|
|
|
It's an imperfect world, screws fall out all the time.
|
|
|
|
|
Maximilien wrote: "0-based array" and "1 based array"
That's about right.
Maximilien wrote: 1 (e.g. pascal)
Pascal allows you to specify the range. And with OOP you can define a class that implements arbitrary indexing, e.g. new MyArray ( -5 , 10 ) .
|
|
|
|
|
|
In a separate millenium I wrote a 1 based C++ string class - I think that was the best argument for zero based code I've ever seen.
|
|
|
|
|
'0' based one- Just called it Orray. 
Starting to think people post kid pics in their profiles because that was the last time they were cute - Jeremy.
|
|
|
|
|
Maximilien wrote: Is there a technical term to say if an array starts at index 0 (e.g. C/C++) or 1 (e.g. pascal) ?
The term is "array", and they start at index 0. There's a difference when talking about strings, not arrays.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Standard & Mutant ? why was Pascal 1 based? anyone know if Delphi is has one based arrays as it might explain some error generated by a test application I have to use?
|
|
|
|
|
glennPattonWork wrote: why was Pascal 1 based?
It's not, neither is Object-Pascal (Delphi). The type-definition of an array would contain the start-index and the end-index. One would use 0, obviously. Dynamic arrays start at 0.
Even BASIC[^] starts at 0.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Let's call them Zeray and Oneray.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, zero-based and one-based indexing are correct terms.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Maximilien wrote: Is it simply "0-based array" and "1-based array" ?
Yes.
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
