Welcome to the Lounge

Lopatir wrote:

because the second wont compile? (missing close bracket)

megaadam wrote:

one of the most annoying songs in recent history
 

(
    this,
    new ProcessEventArgs()
    {
        fromMembrane,
        fromReceptor,
        membrane,
        target,
        obj
    }
)

Jim_Snyder wrote:

I would like the bottom form if the number of parentheses matched.

Jim_Snyder wrote:

For some Markdown Formatting reason, I cannot get Processing.Fire to display in the block.

Bizarre. Works for me!

GuyThiebaut wrote:

insert a field in the middle of the others and the thing will go kaboom

Richard Deeming wrote:

Does it make sense for the properties to be writeable?

public class ProcessEventArgs : EventArgs
{
  public IMembrane FromMembrane { get; protected set; }
  public IReceptor FromReceptor { get; protected set; }
  public IMembrane ToMembrane { get; protected set; }
  public IReceptor ToReceptor { get; protected set; }
  public ISemanticType SemanticType { get; protected set; }

  public ProcessEventArgs(IMembrane fromMembrane, IReceptor fromReceptor, IMembrane toMembrane, IReceptor toReceptor, ISemanticType st)
  {
    FromMembrane = fromMembrane;
    FromReceptor = fromReceptor;
    ToMembrane = toMembrane;
    ToReceptor = toReceptor;
    SemanticType = st;
  }
}

public class ProcessEventArgs : EventArgs
{
  public IMembrane FromMembrane { get; }
  public IReceptor FromReceptor { get; }
  public IMembrane ToMembrane { get; }
  public IReceptor ToReceptor { get; }
  public ISemanticType SemanticType { get; }
 
  public ProcessEventArgs(IMembrane fromMembrane, IReceptor fromReceptor, IMembrane toMembrane, IReceptor toReceptor, ISemanticType semanticType)
  {
    FromMembrane = fromMembrane;
    FromReceptor = fromReceptor;
    ToMembrane = toMembrane;
    ToReceptor = toReceptor;
    SemanticType = semanticType;
  }
}

Processing.Fire(this, new ProcessEventArgs(
  fromMembrane: fromMembrane,
  fromReceptor: fromReceptor,
  toMembrane: membrane,
  toReceptor: target,
  semanticType: obj
));

Richard Deeming wrote:

Also, named parameters can make the constructor look more like the object initializer:

Richard Deeming wrote:

Also, named parameters can make the constructor look more like the object initializer:

Pete O'Hanlon wrote:

More importantly, the second example implies that you have opened up the scope of the properties to be read/write as opposed to read only

Johnny J. wrote:

I'm old school, so the second one any day!