|
Try this...  [^]
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm tool lazy to check post from the weekend...for me it's like a black hole, something never happened... 
(But surely, your name is Paul  )
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't call me Shirley!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
You evil man, answered with a re-post 
|
|
|
|
|
"Ask a programmer to review 10 lines of code, he'll find 10 issues. Ask him to do 500 lines and he'll say it looks good."
The quote is not mine but is good!
|
|
|
|
|
It's like someone took a transcript of a couple arguing at IKEA and made random edits until it compiled without errors.
...having the discussion about the astronomical probability that You do not exist[^] in mind, I'd like to see someone calculating how long it would probably take to actually do the above
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
About twenty minutes if you look at some of the code in QA...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I think it will take more effort to convert a transcript of a quarrel into compilable code than fabricating an average QA-code
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Nah - not for VB.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
especially with VB - it already looks like a quarrel by itself
If You.Say(Me Is Nothing) OrElse Me.GetType() IsNot You.GetType() Then End
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
How do you pass the message to a newbie? With kindness. If the "newbie" has potential, then being an a**hole about it, serves no purpose.
The comic strip promotes assholes, mentoring newbies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Google is king when it comes to violating it's own motto "Don't be evil"
“Everything is simple when you take your time to analyze it.”
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome. When did you finally come to this realization?
|
|
|
|
|
Very recently
“Everything is simple when you take your time to analyze it.”
|
|
|
|
|
Evil serves a very important role. Without evil, we wouldn't know what good is. Thus, evil is simply a "lesser good". Therefore, Google is good. QED.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
True, good and evil are like best buddies, non can exist without the other. Is it even possible to run a success business or company without being slightly evil?
“Everything is simple when you take your time to analyze it.”
|
|
|
|
|
BupeChombaDerrick wrote: Is it even possible to run a success business or company without being slightly evil?
Of course it is.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
...and he goes on to prove that black is white (and dies at the zebra crossing). 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Inverted perceptive, black can be white, good can be bad and vice versa. 
“Everything is simple when you take your time to analyze it.”
|
|
|
|
|
Minus 20 points for missing the reference.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Evil deserves no role. If we did not have evil then we would have no problem not knowing what good is. We would be happy as ever never asking the question.
|
|
|
|
|
Good lord, I never realized you work for Obama... 
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought Godel proved that a system can't prove its own consistency unless it is inconsistent. So, Google is bad
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
