|
Pseudo intellectualism sounds a bit pseudo-intellectual...
|
|
|
|
|
Ha ha ha. It was a cool phrase man. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
At some point, there must be a tipping point where pseudo stops being pseudo and becomes real. I suspect that there's no hard delineation there, but it's interesting to think that there's a grey area where one slips over into the other.
|
|
|
|
|
Long time no see, buddy. And totally agree. But, two things to consider...
1) Experience is the real teacher in life. You cannot really learn something until you go through it. Let me give an analogy. You can read about heart break in books or watch YouTube for a year. You may think you're an expert. Nothing will prepare you for the real thing. Experience.
This doesn't mean don't read, but even Einstein agreed there is another tipping point where books can do just as much harm as reading nothing at all, when they become a crutch. At some point, you need to apply that knowledge to really learn.
2) There's no guarantee the master carpenter isn't also studied and experienced. Maybe they haven't kept up and you do surpass them. I've met a lot of ignorant doctors for instance. But without that experience there are things you really don't know and never will... maybe like why things are the way they are. And it's folly to assume before you even talk to them that your YouTube videos makes you better. As in, a real intellectual will ascertain first.
Now, you can learn from other people's experience, but you also have to actually talk to them rather than insult them before speaking to them because you watched a video. Which never happens online. It's just an ego trip by most from what I've seen.
Jeremy Falcon
modified 9-Sep-24 10:58am.
|
|
|
|
|
sexual intellectual!
>64
It’s weird being the same age as old people. Live every day like it is your last; one day, it will be.
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: I watched one YouTube video. Kneel before me my knowledge.
Until you meet the guy who watched, two, count them, two YouTube videos on the topic..
|
|
|
|
|
Ha ha ha ha. Kneel before Zod! Am I right?
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I've found that, generally, I have to watch at least three YouTube videos to become a true expert.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey all, long time passive viewer of all things CP, but especially the Daily Insider. Over the last ~10 days I haven't had one Daily Insider come through, which means ... withdrawal symptoms . Looks like I'm still subscribed, and not going to Spam, so I was just wondering if anyone else is having this issue?
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
|
It has been reported there for at least a week. It looks like Kent is out of commission for some reason. Not sure what.
To err is human to really elephant it up you need a computer
modified 9-Sep-24 14:03pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the heads-up, I had no idea
Clearly I'm not the only one struggling with this
|
|
|
|
|
Same here! I'm also going through withdrawal. I verified it's not come in for me since August 29th. What's up?
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Lee 2021 wrote: Looks like I'm still subscribed
Have you paid your daily subscription?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same, and just like last week, I did receive the weekly newsletter.
I'm taking for granted whoever writes the Daily Insider ("Ken"?) took some time off. Strictly speaking, it's still summer.
|
|
|
|
|
After a ton of work hacking away at plutovg and integrating its functionality, I came up with this API
using color_t = color<TYPE>;
const int width = 80;
const int height = 80;
bmp = create_bitmap<TYPE>(size16(width,height));
bmp.fill(bmp.bounds(),color_t::blue);
float center_x = width / 2.f;
float center_y = height / 2.f;
float face_radius = 35;
float eye_radius = 5;
float mouth_radius = 25;
float eye_offset_x = 12;
float eye_offset_y = 10;
float eye_x = center_x - eye_offset_x;
float eye_y = center_y - eye_offset_y;
canvas c(size16(width,height));
c.on_write_callback([](const rect16& bounds, rgba_pixel<32> color, void* state){
return bmp.fill(bounds,color);
});
c.on_read_callback([](point16 location,rgba_pixel<32>* out_color, void* state){
return bmp.point(location,out_color);
});
c.initialize();
c.arc({center_x,center_y},face_radius,0,math::two_pi,0);
c.fill_color(color_t::yellow);
c.stroke_color(color_t::black);
canvas_stroke_style style = c.stroke_style();
style.width = 5;
c.stroke_style(style);
c.render();
c.arc({eye_x,eye_y},eye_radius,0,math::two_pi,false);
c.arc(pointf(eye_offset_x+center_x,eye_y),eye_radius,0,math::two_pi,false);
c.stroke_paint_type(canvas_paint_type::none);
c.fill_color(color_t::black);
c.render();
c.arc({center_x,center_y},mouth_radius,0,math::pi,0);
c.fill_paint_type(canvas_paint_type::none);
c.render();
print_ascii(bmp);
free(bmp.begin());
This draws a smiley face, all pretty and anti-aliased.
Unfortunately it's more complicated to use than I'd like owing to all the capabilities and options.
Either way, I'm thrilled to have gotten this far. I had to gut plutovg, and I'll probably do more.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
Unless I am way off in the left field , mistaken, did "Code project" instructions "how to reply" included
" do not reply with "Google it" , the OP probably already did that"...
Am I wrong?
Please JUST confirm - there are more pleasant things in life than to dwell on something which cannot be rectified.
Of course for challenged , hard to hear "contributor" , it would not make any difference anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Google it.
The lounge has its own rules, don't blame me.
|
|
|
|
|
The rant is a perfectly valid post for the lounge.
I am not blaming, only correcting, you
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
jana_hus wrote: Am I wrong? No, you are not.
Still... there is a lot of times where the poster gives the impression of not having done efford with the issue or even writing the question. I am not telling your case is this case, only that, for me that's a perfectly valid situation to answer with it.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
jana_hus wrote: it would not make any difference anyway. So stop whining and move on.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
I can't speak for everyone else, but IMO the problem is... you refused to stop asking programming questions the lounge and you don't construct posts coherently. I'm not sure if English is your native language or not (says you live in the US on your profile), but if people can't make heads or tails out of your posts without needing a cryptogram decoder, it generally doesn't end well.
And I'm not saying there's no merit to wishing for a better quality of replies to questions. But certainly, two wrongs don't make a right. That doesn't mean you can't do better at articulating your questions.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|