|
trΓΈnderen wrote: So I checked Wikipedia You might be right in this case, but you should rely on better sources than that.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, but when you have been in the IT business for 40+ years and never heard a single hint of neither Lempel nor Ziv being involved in either PDF or MP3, so at the outset, you are 99.9% sure, and Wikipedia confirms your 99.9% certainty (by not saying a word about any connection, which it certainly should have, if it was a fact), then Wikipedia may serve as a reference point for other people who have been in the business for a shorter time than I have.
I certainly do not trust Wikipedia, but it may serve as a decent starting point for an information search. In this case, I think that being right in the middle of it for 40+ years (including teaching the principles of LZ77 and MP3 at college level) constitutes sufficient advance research that I can support the Wikipedia information in this question.
If I were misinformed, I would think that some CPians would provide some reliable references to show that I am wrong. I haven't seen traces of that yet.
(I have a friend who has been living in Sweden for 40 years: He just knows of this Swede who is the sole inventor of MP4 (I believe that my friend knew the guy). The invention was stolen out of his hands, along with a handful other inventions of his. I don't know if this Swede knew Lempel and Ziv - maybe those were the culprits. Or maybe he stole their MP3 contributions and created MP4 from that. My friend bluntly rejects any discussion of the issue, and if given references to anything contradicting his firm beliefs, he just pushes it aside and turns his back to it. He only believes in the truth.
In my fantasy, I like to play with the idea of gathering together a group of such firm believers in who is to take the credit for the invention of this and that, and let them have a dogfight to straighten out the question, to come to a conclusion so that we can rewrite the history according to what they agree upon after the fight. On the other hand, maybe we already have such a thing, in Wikipedia !)
|
|
|
|
|
ditto to OG
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
The other one, Welch, (L Z W), is already gone in 1988.
|
|
|
|
|
#Worldle #429 2/6 (100%)
π©π¨β¬β¬β¬β¬
οΈ
π©π©π©π©π©π
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
Knew where it was but had to peek because bad memory
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
#Worldle #428 1/6 (100%)
π©π©π©π©π©π
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
easy one
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 645 3/6
β¬β¬β¬π¨π©
β¬π©π¨β¬π©
π©π©π©π©π©
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 645 3/6
β¬β¬π¨π¨π¨
π©β¬π¨π¨π©
π©π©π©π©π©
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 645 4/6
β¬π¨π¨β¬β¬
β¬β¬π¨π¨π©
π©π©π¨π¨π©
π©π©π©π©π©
Had 2 letters flipped or it would 3/6
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 645 2/6*
β¬β¬β¬β¬π©
π©π©π©π©π©
Well. That was lucky!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 645 3/6*
β¬β¬β¬β¬π©
π©π©π¨π¨π© - Should be worth 2.5 don't you think?
π©π©π©π©π©
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 645 3/6
β¬β¬β¬π¨π©
β¬β¬π¨π¨π©
π©π©π©π©π©
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 645 3/6
β¬β¬β¬π¨π©
π¨β¬π¨π¨π©
π©π©π©π©π©
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 645 3/6
β¬β¬β¬π¨π©
π©π©π¨π¨π©
π©π©π©π©π©
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
On a whim, this weekend I started re-reading "The Mythical Man-Month". I had forgotten what a delightful book it is:
Quote:
Why is programming fun? What delights may its practitioner expect as his reward?
First is the sheer joy of making things. As the child delights in his mud pie, so the adult enjoys building things, especially things of his own design...
Second is the pleasure of making things that are useful to other people. Deep within, we want others to use our work and to find it helpful...
Third is the fascination of fashioning complex puzzle-like objects of interlocking moving parts and watching them work in subtle cycles, playing out the consequences of principles built in from the beginning...
Fourth is the joy of always learning, which springs from the nonrepeating nature of the task...
Finally, there is the delight of working in such a tractable medium. The programmer, like the poet, works only slightly removed from pure thought-stuff... Some of the stuff seems even more germane these days than it was when it was written:
Quote: The purpose of a programming system is to make a computer easy to use. To do this, it furnishes languages and various facilities that are in fact programs invoked and controlled by language features. But these facilities are bought at a price: the external description of a programming system is ten to twenty times as large as the external description of the computer system itself. The user finds it far easier to specify any particular function, but there are far more to choose from, and far more options and formats to remember.
Ease of use is enhanced only if the time gained in functional specification exceeds the time lost in learning, remembering, and searching manuals. With modern programming systems this gain does exceed the cost, but in recent years the ratio of gain to cost seems to have fallen Feel like trying new frameworks anyone?
Mircea
|
|
|
|
|
Mircea Neacsu wrote: Feel like trying new frameworks anyone?
Only because .net has so much backward support for v1 :grrrrrr: .
We need a replacement for .net and C#. It's been twenty years now.
|
|
|
|
|
I wish the software development at large to take such an attitude towards C/C++ (50+ yo) and *nix CLI.
|
|
|
|
|
I loved IBM Thinkpads. It's as if they sat me down, interviewed me for two hours, and then built a laptop based on their findings.
The little eraserhead pointer that everyone hates I wish I had on all my keyboards. I can use the mouse without taking my hands of the home row and my wrist isn't clicking an annoying trackpad all the time.
But it's more than that. They had the build quality, top tier LCD tech at the time, great bleeding edge hardware (first laptop with a mobile Pentium III for example), and stellar support. I had video hardware on one go tits up and IBM sent a tech to my workplace the next day who replaced my lappy's mainboard. I lost maybe 5 hours of productivity to my primary dev machine going out. That's not bad, actually.
The only real achilles heel they had were the HDDs - the "IBM DeskDeathStar" drives. Most were good, but they had a run of them that were just junk - but it was a misstep from a company that was usually pretty reliable about quality. The situation stood out for being the exception to the rule.
Then they sold everything to Lenovo. I haven't touched Lenovo machines. How's the build quality?
Are there laptops that have supplanted the thinkpad's former niche at the high end**?
Especially with those little pointing nubs. Love them.
** non-gaming
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm completely fan of hp elitebook.
Unfortunately for you, no little pointing nubs 
|
|
|
|
|
I won't buy HP. Too many bad experiences.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
They're OK, but I'll stick with Dell and Microsoft Surface laptops.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm. I've had dell laptops before. I wasn't super impressed. It felt like driving a toyota. Standard trackpad, standard screen, standard keyboard. Stock upper mid shelf CPU.
Nothing to really hate about them (except the trackpad), but nothing I loved either.
I'm looking for something... sportier? I want to fall in love with it.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: I'm looking for something... sportier? I want to fall in love with it.
Well, take a look at Alienware then.
Just like Lexus is made by Toyota, Alienware is made by Dell.
On a different note, while some manufacturers indeed only make junk, most have different lines aiming for different customers.
Dell and Lenovo both makes junk less good computers, while both also make good stuff.
I've personally have had VERY good experience with Dell Latitude, but they also produce junk I'm afraid.
The lineup from Dell goes like:
AlienWare -> Gaming, Performance, big and heavy
Precision -> Workstations, Performance, almost as big and heavy
XPS -> small and Light
Latitude -> Business, long lasting, compromise on everything except price
Inspiron -> Cheap
Vostro -> Garbage
G Series -> Dunno, have to check them out
I have no clue what the current lineup from Lenovo is I'm afraid
|
|
|
|
|
Just supplementing this post, Dell has a Precision that is a business class XPS. I believe it is the 5000 series Precision.
The G Series was an evolution of their Inspiron gaming series, and both were pretty solid (I've had my Inspiron gaming laptop for 7 years now). However, last years G series were plagued with all sorts of issues and would not recommend purchasing.
@Honey the codewitch if you want a good Dell laptop go with the XPS or the Precision equivalent if you need the extra business features.
|
|
|
|
|
I now own my 3rd Vostro and they've been reliable machines (2 laptops, 1 desktop). Until you've owned one, you don't possess the right to bad mouth it.
|
|
|
|