|
which do you have on your computers. If you have a display port that is probably more better. But either will work.
I had this issue yesterday. But it was slightly different. only had DisplayPort cables and was trying to setup to HDMI. Fun fun.
To err is human to really elephant it up you need a computer
|
|
|
|
|
Neither, get a DisplayPort cable. Surely the monitor has a DP hole (no pun intended) even if it didn't come with a suitable cable, any monitor that I've bought in the last decade has had one.
Or DP to HDMI if you must. VGA to HDMI exists, but that's an extra analog-digital conversion and the adapters come with their own limits (not high ones) on resolution and framerate.
|
|
|
|
|
I see no DP jack on this monitor
I'll ask the place where I bought it
[[[-EDIT-]]]
Just looked it up.
Found THESE SPECS HERE and it looks like No DP was planned or built.
It has HDMI
It has no DP
I will be happily corrected if I'm wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
That's some previous-gen tech you got there, but so be it. Even VGA to HDMI adapter has a chance here, because it's only 1080p at 60Hz, which many such adapters support (as their maximum rating).
|
|
|
|
|
I've had mixed results with adapters - say one that converts DP to VGA. Save your receipts.
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
Buy a DisplayPort to HDMI cable. Adapters can cause signal loss.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you each and every human here.
Indeed, a better cable is next on the agenda.
Walmart to the rescue; bought an adapter; probably not the greatest idea; but works for the moment.
|
|
|
|
|
Which cryptographic "mode", AES, Rijndael, etc. is the most difficult to break? 
Excluding of course, the way women think.
ed
|
|
|
|
|
That's rather sexist, isn't it?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Is this one of those awkward grandpa moments? You know, the one where grandpa tells off-color, racist, sexist, and otherwise cringe-worthy jokes. 
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I am kinda that age, so I'll have a go if you want ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I remember when jokes were allowed to be - you know - FUNNY!
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
It was a bad attempt at a joke. 
Now too the crux of my question? What do you think? About cryptography?
I am only partly misogynist BTW. 
I have a wife, two daughters, and no grandchildren.
ed
|
|
|
|
|
Which means he has lots of experience on the subject.
Ducks and runs.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, Thank you. I appreciate your help.
ed
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Poor attempt at humor:
Any of them can be broken by the use of an expensive hooker. 
>64
Some days the dragon wins. Suck it up.
|
|
|
|
|
AES and Rijndael are basically the same: Advanced Encryption Standard - Wikipedia[^].
I suggest you to read the "AES Proposal: Rijndael" (link available at the very wikipedia page), for insight.
"In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?"
-- Rigoletto
|
|
|
|
|
First, you'll need a strong Brownian Motion producer (say a nice hot cup of tea) ...
|
|
|
|
|
@GregUtas
Where's the CCC?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I apparently got my MIDI code working last night. I had no memory of doing so. In fact, I planned to do so this morning, but I fired up my code and it worked. Then it started coming back to me.
For a blessed minute it felt like having little helper elves that come overnight and fix my things.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
Congrats! Your next mission, should you decide to accept it, is to make your code compatible with MPE. 
I'm not sure I want my MIDI devices to be hooked up to the internet, though. What's your vision there?
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't plan on supporting MPE until the industry decides whether they're going that route or doing MIDI 2.0 instead.
I currently am working on MIDI over bluetooth but I hate bluetooth - it's dodgy as heck.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
Everyone is doing MPE now. I've got two MPE instruments, and both DAWs I use (Logic and Cubase) and a good number of my UAs/VSTs support it, especially those from Roli.
As for MIDI 2.0, Roger Linn, who created the Linnstrument, said "The vast majority of what people really want to do has already been made possible by MIDI 1.0. This industry moves very slowly, and we have a lot of small developers who don’t have the resources to support every standard, so MIDI 2.0 might take a long time before it is widely in use."
I agree about Bluetooth, especially for live streaming of MIDI data.
Edit: Speaking of Linn, he also said MPE has "existed since the beginning of MIDI in the form of what they called MIDI Mode 4."
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
