|
Astronaut Howard Wolowitz: Welcome to team putz!
|
|
|
|
|
You had us at the posts title. No further details were needed…
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
You are too kind!
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
I once had that.
So every morning I came into the office, turned on my monitor and then my laptop.
One day, I didn't press the on button well enough and the monitor stayed off.
And I was like crap my monitor broke!
Even called in my boss for a replacement monitor and then he just turned it on...
Not my proudest moment 
|
|
|
|
|
Herself just sealed some pasta sauce to reheat in the sous vide for supper, and she was holding the lid down in case it opened on it's own.
So I just ran the numbers: the lid is about 10" wide by 15" long, so that's 10 * 15 * 14.7 pounds of air holding the lid shut since there is as-near-as-damnit no air on the inside (-0.1MPa on the gauge). That's about 1000Kg
That's the weight of four motorcycles sitting on the lid ... no wonder it's seriously thick perspex! 
No, darling - you don't need to hold the lid shut, you couldn't open it if you tried!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: No, darling - you don't need to hold the lid shut, you couldn't open it if you tried!
Good luck with that. I wouldn't try it myself. 
>64
Some days the dragon wins. Suck it up.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: So I just ran the numbers: the lid is about 10" wide by 15" long, so that's 10 * 15 * 14.7 pounds of air holding the lid shut since there is as-near-as-damnit no air on the inside (-0.1MPa on the gauge). That's about 1000Kg
Going from heathen to metric.
Impressive.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Inches and miles are a "natural measurement" for me - I can estimate cm up to 10 or so, but above that I revert to inches. I know how long it would take me to walk or drive 3.5 miles, but 5.5Km is not something I have a "feel for". But I measure wood in mm, ingredients in g, droplets in picolitres, and "medium distances" in m.
Go figure.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: But I measure ...
politicians in 'idiocies'?
|
|
|
|
|
David O'Neil wrote: politicians in 'idiocies' corruptions?
FTFY 
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
My mind is metric. I would never cross beams!
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Inches and miles are a "natural measurement" for me
I've always assumed I'm built wrong. My foot isn't a foot long, and my thumb isn't an inch wide, so for any measurement that needs any sort of accuracy, there's nothing "natural" to me about the imperial system. 
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Inches and miles are a "natural measurement" for me
Bill Bryson:
'Of course they make sense,' the British person will sniff. 'Half a firkin is a jug, half a jug is a tot, half a tot is a titter, half a titter is a c**k-droplet. What's not logical about that?'
(Side remark: I have seek acres (i.e. fields) far bigger than an acre. I have lifted stones far heavier than a stone. I have seen furs significant longer than a furlong. Recommendation for baroque affectionados: Twas within a furlong[^] - I guess the furlong referenced is somewhat longer than the standard measure. l'Arpeggiata at its best!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do any of you have a file server in your home LAN?
If so, is it worth it?
Opinions, recommendations, etc would be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a NAS configured to RAID 5 (well, two NASes) which is accessible to all devices - so my desktop, Surface, Phone, Herself's Tablets, the Surface in the kitchen, and Chromecast can all access the same files.
Is that worth it? For me, yes. It's not a "cheap solution" but RAID5 means I can survive a HDD failure without any data loss (which I have done) and being able to access important / useful documents from anywhere in the house is very handy. Just for the "kitchen surface" alone: I can add recipes on my desktop with a proper keyboard and update the NAS, then the Surface can pick them up and display them while I'm cooking. And so on.
For me, a NAS is a better solution than a file server: smaller, quieter, lower power consumption, and more reliable as well as easier to maintain.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Much appreciated.
Brand and capacity, please?
This is all new to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Seagate Blackarmor 4 bay, 16TB giving a storage space of 11.9TB in RAID 5 (you always lose some space with raid as it stores additional info for recovery when a HDD goes dead).
I've had this one for 7 or 8 years and it's been no trouble at all (the HDD failure was on the previous 4TB NAS which was too full and too slow). Read speeds average around 85MByte/sec; Write is understandably slower at around 35MByte/sec. Sorry, I can't remember how much I paid!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I had a file server but it sits there unused, now.
I too have a NAS. Like Griff's, it is a 4 bay 16TB Raid5 unit. It is a Raid+ with 4 4TB SSD drives. The usable is about the same as his.
I too have had it for several years and don't remember the price. The NAS came without drives, and I bought the aforementioned Western Digital SSD drives.
I am extremely pleased with it, and think you would be better going that route.
ed
|
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: then the Surface can pick them up and display them while I'm cooking
Most restaurants here don't have that luxury. I imagine your kitchen to sport USB sockets 
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, it picks up via WiFi.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Have you measured the real sustained transfer rate from the application to the network?
And the average and variation in access time? The time it takes to create ten thousand tiny files? How does it compare to an M.2 disk?
Obviously you won't have an M.2 disk of ten terabytes; I am not proposing that as viable alternative I ask the questions just to make people aware of the cost (in time) of the solutions that are capable of handling tens of terabytes of data. You can't just scale up linearly with the data volume / file count the expected time to complete, from your M.2 disk!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
