|
Thank you! so far 2 against 1 for Camtasia against anything else
Nick Polyak
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't played with Camtasia, but another editor worth being aware of is HitFilm. They have an express version available which they will let you pick up for free, although they do try to guilt trip you. Even the express version is extremely powerful, and easy to use with a little play. It does not do screen recording, though (as far as I've found).
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks David - I do need screen recording though - this is the most important part for me.
Nick Polyak
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Nick,
1. For screen recording, I recommend OBS Studio[^] -- it's free.
2. For editing, I shamelessly recommend my own software -- Cinematic Studio - trimming/editing is a bliss, and you can do some pretty slick text effects 
Best,
John
|
|
|
|
|
For recording, I would go for OBS.. It's used by lots of streamers/youtuber's. You could even go Streamlabs OBS which is a reskinned version.
For editing, you cant go past Davinci Resolve. You'll only need the free version.
|
|
|
|
|
For editing get Davinci Resolve. It is simply amazing. I've used some other programs in the past to edit videos and no one is as powerful as this one FOR FREE and, moreover it is easy to use.
|
|
|
|
|
It's not often that I geek out anymore, but looking up that software and seeing that they offer the whole suite of hardware to go with it made my nerd side happy.
|
|
|
|
|
I use SnagIt from Techsmith. One of the more user friendly ones I've used especially when it comes to the editing portion.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll throw another vote in for Camtasia. I have used many versions over the years for making training videos. It's been all good. One of the most enjoyable pieces of software I can think of.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks to everyone who answered I already chose Camtasia.
Nick Polyak
|
|
|
|
|
Quick FYI: I recently discovered there's built-in video screen capture in Win 10. (I think editing is limited to cut/paste but I don't remember the details.) PC Mag article.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lateral moves (within the same organization) 
|
|
|
|
|
The range of movement is astonishing but it is still just programming, what amazes me is the bush navigation capabilities where presumably the robot has to make decisions (assumes they have not repeated the process umpteen times).
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP
|
|
|
|
|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: The range of movement is astonishing
That was my thought also, movements almost looked life like.
The less you need, the more you have.
Even a blind squirrel gets a nut...occasionally.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
By "just programming" are you stating someone coded each and every motion I can't imagine a more tedious task I would presume the humanoid robots were fed a motion capture via worn sensors of a human dancer or perhaps merely a video of the dancer and then mimic the motion while calculating the necessary balance unique to themselves Perhaps that is your meaning As for the dancing doggy and that other thing I have no idea Perhaps they were merely tediously programmed Catchy tune though What is "bush navigation"
|
|
|
|
|
PaltryProgrammer wrote: By "just programming" are you stating someone coded each and every motion I can't imagine a more tedious task
I have programmed industry robots for some years and I can ensure you, it is not tedious at all. That and PLC programming is a lot of fun.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Where's Isaac Asimov when you need him? Dick Clark for that matter?
Are the 3 laws of robotics built in?
Robbie
|
|
|
|
|
Good or Bad Idea?
modified 3-Nov-21 11:26am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
you sound like Father Jack Hackett! Yes to good or Bad?
|
|
|
|
|
MarcusCole6833 wrote: Yes to good or Bad?
Yes.
But seriously, how can anyone answer such a question? We know nothing about you, nothing about the organization you work for, nothing about your present or future roles, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
Without context, it could be either I suppose.
Developer to PM? doesn't sound that lateral to me.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
modified 3-Nov-21 11:46am.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
