|
Please read the Lounge posting guidelines, and post technical question in an appropriate forum.
«The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch
|
|
|
|
|
It is not meant to be a technical argument. It is just general usage of ambiguous terms. After all, no semicolons were harmed by it.
So many years of programming I have forgotten more languages than I know.
|
|
|
|
|
As shown by others, this is not correct for C#. But it did bring one question to mind.
When talking about a method signature, what are the inputs given to the method considered to be? Parameters or arguments? Those are the two most common that come to my mind, though I can think of others.
Are parameters and arguments just completely synonymous? Does it matter how they're being used? Maybe describing the definition of the method compared to describing being executed at runtime? What are they called when using one as a value or reference within the method? Or do they just just turn into "variable" at that point and the original term is meaningless?
I've thought about this too much now while writing this and can only contradict my own thoughts now. Does anyone have a clear way of thinking about this case?
|
|
|
|
|
Arguments is an old term that is not used much any more. You still find arguments in many references. Parameters is the newer term for the same thing.
This is where words get confusing. When you use get/set many consider it a kind of super argument/parameter. That is why many references consider things with get/set use the term parameters.
My whole point in this rant is no one is right or wrong. They are not terms with rigid meanings cast in syntax stone. They are all just general concepts.
So many years of programming I have forgotten more languages than I know.
|
|
|
|
|
Nanci Griffith[^]
A wonderful singer/songwriter, a lovely, distinctive voice, and had a ear for other great songwriters (she turned me on to several), damn. 
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
sad, what is the cause?
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure, it wasn't publicized, but I know she's battled cancer couple of times in the past.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
I have an old tablet--a BlackBerry Playbook--that I've stopped using a good while ago. The hardware still works great, it's the software loaded on it that's pretty much been abandoned.
I thought I found a good use for it - my router has a page showing a (near) real-time bandwidth usage graph, which I find to be very handy to keep an eye on what's going on. Loading that page on a tablet sitting on my desk, and just letting it run all day, would mean I don't have to dedicate space on one of the monitors hooked up to my main system--and not getting buried under other windows. It's always there and available. The page isn't so sophisticated that the tablet's ancient browser has any problem rendering it.
However BlackBerry, in its infinite wisdom, has decided that the timeout value for the tablet to go to sleep maxes out at not 12 hours, not an hour, not 30 minutes...but 5 minutes. With no option to disable it altogether. That means the monitor is shown for 5 minutes, hard max, and then the tablet goes to sleep.
It's a simple job. The tablet, despite being ancient, is more than capable of handling it. But because someone decided it was a good idea to force the tablet to go to sleep after 5 minutes - even when plugged in - I can't even assign it that task.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some good suggestions in there for sure, thanks for that. Unfortunately, I'm not gonna be writing code, so #2 is out. I'm not sure how I would use #3. Host a file with that code on a web server running somewhere, and load it in a separate browser tab?
That leaves #1. Some ideas there sounded promising, but so far, they all failed.
Maybe I should just get Homer's keyboard duck to tap on the display every few seconds...
|
|
|
|
|
Is it a touch screen?
If yes,
Get a string, something like a crazy ball that will be recognized as a touch, and a small fan.
Hang the ball on the screen and point the fan at it.
Don’t stare at it too long or you might be hypnotized.
|
|
|
|
|
Is a bee just a bear with no ears?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Hive no idea what you're talking about.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
From what I hear, the buzz is that's a real honey of a pun - had to think twice.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
modified 17-Aug-21 11:43am.
|
|
|
|
|
'ear, 'ear!
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I REALLY hope not! I've just started bee keeping and gotten my first hive (seriously).
I'd hate to see bears coming out of it, and without ears, they wouldn't be able to hear me yell "Noooooo, please don't eat me!" 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, but think of the amount of honey a hive full of bears could produce! 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: think of the amount of honey a hive full of bears could produce consume!
FTFY! 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Only when spelling.
Commander Vimes
|
|
|
|
|
For three days, because they have found a single "in the wild" case: New Zealand plunged back into snap lockdown after single Covid case detected[^]
Well done NZ! That's the way to handle it, rather than pussy footing around ... 
The really interesting bit is at the end, where it talks about the Delta Variant:
Quote: Officials earlier on Tuesday outlined details of unrelated virus cases found at a border quarantine facility in Auckland that showed how easily the delta strain spreads.
An investigation found three people sharing a room were infected by a delta case staying across the corridor after their doors were both open at the same time for just three to five seconds.
There (presumably) has to be more to it than that, but ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: There (presumably) has to be more to it than that
Rule by fear.
The reactions of governments is now beyond ridiculous. The virus is here to stay and no amount of lockdowns, quarantines or red lists is going to change that. The sooner we all get back to normal the sooner we (and future generations) will be able to live with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: The sooner we all get back to normal the sooner we (and future generations) will be able to live with it.
I can't imagine, that we'll be able to "go back to normal". But I agree that we should accept it is here to stay (at least for a good while) and try to evolve and adapt, creating a newer version of "normal". Trying to live respecting it, but not fearing it to the point of shutting everything down every few months.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The lockdowns are not for stopping the virus in it's tracks.
They're for slowing down the spread so hospitals are not overrun to beyond capacity, like is happening in the South right now.
|
|
|
|
|
I know... and I actually am not against them. But it pisses me a bit off, how they are being politized and partially missused.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I think "normal" is gone forever. What is "normal" by the way? I disagree that it is "rule by fear".
Commander Vimes
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
