|
I wonder if clean browser + TOR or a privacy VPN would help.
I have had fairly good luck in the Walmart marketplace. Most of the time my order goes to a third party.
I just bought 2 small 15 inch tires via Walmart. I loved the fact that they were delivered with just a barcode+address taped to each one. No boxes to recycle!
|
|
|
|
|
I have never had any issues with Amazon price hikes on item re-orders. I order from Amazon at least 2-4 times a month for myself and the family.
I'm not saying it doesn't happen, just saying it has never happened to me yet.
Next time this happens to you, check to see if the re-order item with the price increase is coming from the same vendor you bought from last time. The prices vary greatly sometimes for the same item, by vendor.
Amazon may be giving you another vendor's item at an increased price, if the item is out of stock for the vendor you originally ordered from. Just a thought.
|
|
|
|
|
Well - based on experience and feedback elsewhere in the thread, it certainly does happen. Not always.
One thing I've noticed on both Amazon and Walmart: caveat emptor is in full force with respect to pricing. Some items - often the same item, can vary in price tremendously. The absurdly high prices are (as I remember) always third party vendors. Looking for a quick buck.
A place I also find a useful online ordering source for general merchandise: Target.com .
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, you have to watch the 3rd party vendors. I just ordered an item from Amazon. On the web page there were 2 options: 1 for $5 or 2 for $6.50. Choosing option 2 as the better price I found when I went to checkout that there was a $70 shipping charge. So, cancel that, go back and pick option 1, set a quantity of 4. This time check out shows $20 for 4 item's and free shipping with my prime membership.
Apparently the option 2 vendor was hoping I'd do a 1-click purchase and not notice the high price. The very reason I never do a 1-click purchase. I want to see what the total charges are and who's getting them before I agree. I'll expend the extra clicks, they're cheap.
|
|
|
|
|
And this begs the question: since it's an obvious scam (and there are lot of them on Amazon similar to your description and others) - why is it allowed?
I don't have prime because Amazon is by no means my go-to place for much of anything. It just seems like risky business to shop there.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think Amazon checks - or even cares (beyond their legal liability) - what their vendors charge. I believe vendors can opt in or out of prime capabilities as they choose. I don't believe that what happened to me was illegal, just scummy. And, who knows, perhaps the shipping charge from their location actually was $70.  Caveat emptor? You're d**n skippy!
I don't find Amazon more or less risky than other sites. I find it very convenient since retiring to rural South Dakota. But I nearly always check other sites for pricing and other options before making that final click.
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: Amazon seemed increased the price on anything I already purchased
For me, that's been mostly the case in particular for items actually fulfilled by merchants who may be subjected to currency fluctuations. Otherwise, I have no conspiracy to report. I've seen prices go both up and down, including for items that have been sitting in the cart for weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
So, I manage my passwords locally - I've never really invested in a password manager, mainly because I JUST DON'T TRUST THEM. When I see terms and conditions that say, "If we get hacked and someone gets your passwords, we will pay you lots of money to compensate our error."
When it comes to security, I'm paranoid. I prefer to manage it myself and not depend on other people. Looking at JSOP... Another example: Report: Amazon awarded secret $10B NSA cloud computing contract, Microsoft files protest - GeekWire[^]
I have no idea why the NSA thinks this is a good idea. Maybe they aren't putting much interesting stuff up there, but still.... Sorry, ooo shiny I got distracted.
So, I guess google has added something to chrome that will magically save all my passwords in their vault, and frankly, I think that's just creepy. Hell, they probably have them already now that I think about it.
Comments?
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
Chrome's king in terms of user saturation but I'll stay with Firefox for now.
I wouldn't want my passwords up in the cloud, somewhere, to begin with. If you cannot connect to that segment of the cloud (perhaps it's just too busy being hacked) - you up ![Sunshine | [little ray of sunshine]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/sunshine.gif) creek and your paddle-less boat sprung a leak.
Local is good - my passwords (and for that matter, user ID's, are mine. I keep a catalog of the less commonly used ones - but not directly, but instead use hints that mean nothing to anyone but me in how they're to be translated. No - they're not random strings - but they may as well be as they're rarely English words along with the numbers and special chars. Firefox will remember them for me, too . . . no thanks!.
Another good option is to send them to Chris Maunder and call him whenever you need your memory refreshed.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
"Another good option is to send them to Chris Maunder and call him whenever you need your memory refreshed."
thanks for the laugh! Haven't laughed that hard in a year..... 
I *do* need to de-chrome. browser makes me bonkers at times. I use firefox a bit, playing with opera now.
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
No one can protect your stuff better than you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I use Keepass and I could not be more pleased with it. I do not trust Google as far as I could throw a Sherman tank.
Zaphod
|
|
|
|
|
I don't use Chrome. I do use Edge and let MS manage and sync my passwords. Edge also alerts me when a userid/password combination has been discovered on the dark web.
|
|
|
|
|
absolutely NO to me...
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
I'm just sooo tired of thinking about elephanting passwords.
CI/CD = Continuous Impediment/Continuous Despair
|
|
|
|
|
I'm never logged in to Google, but use Chrome's pwd manager (on my Windows box) to manage my passwords and credit card information. As I understand, this data is local to my PC.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Ravi Bhavnani wrote: As I understand, this data is local to my PC.
Google / Chrome and only local in PC... do you really believe it? 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Like I said, you can always keep your passwords under your mattress.
|
|
|
|
|
"I'll back that up to the cloud for you." -- Clippy
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: do you really believe it?
Even with not being logged in to Google (and therefore it not knowing the user context)? 
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Have you ever been logged in to google in that computer? How many people log in to google in that machine? Do you use a gmail account? How often do you use it? Have you used it to register to some of the places that you manage with the password manager? How often do you clear the history, cookies and other stuff?
They might know more than you think. Even without being 100% sure because you are not logged in, they could have a "good estimation".
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I use Firefox's password manager, but NOT for anything that touches financial. That's all off line.
|
|
|
|
|
I have no worry at all with Google managing my passwords. They have been doing a fine job all these years, with no security breaches that I am aware of with my accounts.
All of my financial sites, and most sites that I pay money on, require 2FA. So, even if my password is compromised, they still can't get in.
You know, you can always keep your passwords under the mattress. Just saying.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually,
The APT17 group via shared international tooling performed Operation Aurora[^] a which penetrated Google along with a myriad of other national assets.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
