|
Unless you are on the downside of it... 
|
|
|
|
|
True enough, or the one that has to clean it up.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know. When I see the words "explosive" and "diarrhea" in the same sentence, I have to click.
|
|
|
|
|
Giardia isn't to be trifled with. Sounds like someone drank untreated water in the back country.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it was seven day old set water ... and you know what people do in the water.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
um, delicious. Could you pass the salt please.
|
|
|
|
|
The, ah, 'burning' question is: were the affected people participants in the show, or simply viewers?
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Okay let me start by saying how much I love the ESP32. It's a 32-bit dual core SoC with wifi and bluetooth for less than $10, what's not to love?
But... Espressif, come on. You made a great piece of hardware, and I want to unlock all of its fancy features.
I ditched the Arduino framework and started coding directly against the ESP-IDF (the dev framework Espressif made specifically for the ESP32)
All is good, woo! I have access to the full STL, to filesystem mount points, to the humble printf() - all the things I couldn't get under Arduino.
Except...
The SPI bus drivers for the ESP-IDF seem to be absolute *garbage*. I've written ESP32 based drivers for an ILI9341 display adapter for both ESP-IDF and the Arduino framework, and the Arduino one runs at 40MHz and I can only top the other one out at 26MHz! Furthermore, with the ESP32 SPI drivers there seem to be timing issues. Until my good logic analyzer gets here I can't know for sure, but it looks like the SCLK line is lagging behind the data lines by half a tick. For this or some other reason I cannot get the ESP-IDF to talk to e-paper/e-ink displays at all.
Why go through all this effort to make a framework for your hardware, and then botch the SPI implementation for it, all the while making a *good* implementation of it for someone else's (Arduino) framework?!
What the heck am I missing?
*headdesk*
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
It is Saturday, you know.
|
|
|
|
|
This is what I do to myself on Saturdays.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
No cartoons? Horse Opera?
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ouch! Sounds like trying to cajole the things into doing what you want is like sporting A Blister In The Sun.
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: What the heck am I missing?
By the sound, chocolotate..
..ice cream 
runs for cover
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
That's a bit bizarre - mind you, I see a lot of iOT work at the moment and I shudder when they use a serial port GPS integration rather than I2C or SPI.
I'll be learning 'ROS' soon, I missed a really nice job in Ag-Tech here because I wasn't prepared to lie on my CV - that being said, yes, it's not an O/S, and I do know messaging, so I could have bluffed my way through mqtt etc
Pretty cool that you write drivers for ESP32 - a level way above me
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: botch the SPI implementation for it, all the while making a *good* implementation of it for someone else's (Arduino) framework?!
Maybe they found, along the way of completing their own framewwork, that Arduino one imperat (attracts many more people)?
"In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?"
-- Rigoletto
|
|
|
|
|
That's not it or they wouldn't still be maintaining the ESP-IDF.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Are they?
I supposed they outsourced it to you. 
"In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?"
-- Rigoletto
|
|
|
|
|
So Firefox has updated itself - completely hosing all my login cookies such as for CodeProject  , but that's another story - to version 89.0. A disturbing behavior of it is that anytime I make the textbox in the body (i.e., the one that is in the center of the window) the active control (i.e., by clicking in it) and start typing, the active window automatically shifts to the textbox in the menu bar. I have tried looking for a setting that stops this, but I can't find it.
Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
|
I have FF 89.0 for Ubuntu.
There are visible differences, like the "New Tab" page (particularly the shortcuts), but I don't see the behaviour you describe.
And my CP login cookie survived unscathed (which is just as well, seeing I don't have a copy of my KeePass db on this machine).
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Install chrome?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
this is the only answer.
this is the only solution.
this is the only path forward. there are no others. stop looking. stop trying.
|
|
|
|
|
Resistance is futile, you will be assimilated 
Mircea
|
|
|
|
|
Or Brave?
If you can keep your head while those about you are losing theirs, perhaps you don't understand the situation.
|
|
|
|
|
There is always wEdge ... so named because it keeps jamming itself into things ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
