|
Don't forget if it was an Apple car you'd have to get a new one to go from a city street to a superhighway.
|
|
|
|
|
And six months later it's top speed would halve ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Don't be silly. Apple cars don't use streets or highways. They have their own astral plane to traverse.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
No way there would be any leather in an Apple car.
The seats would be made of glass, and your back pain would be a figment of your imagination.
|
|
|
|
|
... and you weren't holding it right anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
... plus the gas filler would only be compatible with Apple filling stations in Apple Stores, where a Genius Bar expert will add 100cc of gas per visit. Price per 100cc to be advised.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
And it would not be gas at all, more like a secret mix of plutonium, antimatter and dark matter.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I used to feel that way until I ran linux as a primary OS. Never again. I've never had such stability problems.
Now I'm seriously considering Apple. At least then I get a POSIX OS and closed-loop development that doesn't eat my master boot record every time it updates the OS - seriously a problem I had on my last *THREE* linux machines.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I try to avoid the "your OS wears GI shorts" exchanges. 
Never seen such here and I have been running Linux as my OS for many years. Only had to install it from source once for an old Dell. Again, whatever floats your boat.
Herself couldn't get anywhere on a Windows laptop, kids gave her an Apple MacBook and she was good to go. On her second one in 11 years. She is an Artist, they are "different". Nice kind of different.
If you can keep your head while those about you are losing theirs, perhaps you don't understand the situation.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I'm not an OS holy roller, but I'm just fed up with both windows and linux, personally.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
DEC would make only minis and they would not be marketed for home use.
But they would be very secure.
|
|
|
|
|
And stable. You'd never have to reboot them.
|
|
|
|
|
We recently upgraded our internet connection at work and made me realise that life begins at 100Mbps.
|
|
|
|
|
I have 1,200Mbps at home, 400Mbps at work - and they want me to go back to the office!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
I take it back. 100Mbps is the beginning as for 1,200Mbps that's happiness !
|
|
|
|
|
I don't even think I have network adapters that can handle that. Sheesh. I have 750MBits or so and I'd be happy with 200MBits/s - i know that because my wifi router gets saturated after 200MBits/s of traffic.  I have to hard line into the thing to get my full speed. I only do that for one machine.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
8Mbps down, 0.75 up!
DSL sucks ass
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Losinger wrote: DSL sucks ass
It does. But that's what you get for living on the top of a mountain in the middle of nowhere. 
|
|
|
|
|
Meh. The more bandwidth I have, the more bandwidth I waste. My home connection can sustain a (roughly) 5.3mbps download, and I honestly feel very little incentive to get anything much faster.
[Edit]
And it's not one of those "you don't know what you're missing unless you experience it" type of situations. My work machine (which I reach over VPN) can sustain hundreds of megabytes (not megabits) per second, and while I find that all very impressive, I don't know what use I'd put that to if I had that here at home.
|
|
|
|
|
where more bandwidth comes in handy is when things get busy.
if my wife is on a Zoom call, my remote desktop connection will sometimes simply time out, with our glorious 8Mbps (max, and highly unstable) DSL connection.
if we had even 20Mbps, that wouldn't happen.
modified 11-Jun-21 16:11pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I was going to point out that I'm the only one in the house using my connection, but even then, I did complain a few days ago that every once in a while I have a system that randomly decides to start downloading something; I can't identify which system, and what it's downloading...and that can be a problem.
Getting a faster connection for this case however sounds like a Band-Aid solution, as the root cause would still exist.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. I now have 120Mbps down and upload at 42Mbps with ping at 14ms. Downloading and running a project from github takes 1 minute.
A Xcode update of 14gb was a pain before and is now ready while I have a coffee. Of course, now I have no excuse for not working any more..
jhaga
|
|
|
|
|
I have two STM32 boards collecting dust for two main reasons:
1. There are too many toolchains/frameworks for me to decide which one to rely on primarily.
2. The build times for the ones I've tried from #1 are atrocious. This has been the biggest show stopper for me because even with incremental compiling and linking you still have to do full builds periodically and with these boards it's painful. With the ESP32 you can remove "components" from the framework so you don't suffer build times for things you don't need. With these STM32 frameworks it seems like you have to build things you'll never even use.
Given these two issues, with #2 being a huge deal to me, and given I want to stick with C++, what framework do I choose?
Anyone have any ideas?
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, you should use V, according to this morning's newsletter
The V Programming Language[^]
From the website:
"As fast as C (V's main backend compiles to human readable C)
C interop without any costs
Fast compilation
V compiles ≈110k (Clang backend) and ≈1 million (x64 and tcc backends) lines of code per second per CPU core.
(Intel i5-7500, SM0256L SSD, no optimization)
V is written in V and compiles itself in under a second."
I have no idea what any of this means or if this is in any way applicable to you or your use case(s), but for some reason I thought about you when I read about V this morning
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
Advice?