|
Find the biggest one, and kill that.
It's normally the "master" instance, and the others are web pages and extensions etc. - and the extensions do often get re-opened when they are closed. Cut off the head, and the rest will close as well.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Cut off the head, and the rest will close as well.
That or two will take its place.
Hail Hydra!
|
|
|
|
|
Baron Wolfgang von Strucker sends his greetings.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
MarkTJohnson wrote: Hail Hydra!
I had to talk my buddy Nick out of posting a furious response to that.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I find it's also a matter of timing...if you do it fast enough, you may be able to kill them all before another gets respawned.
Failing that, time to fire up PowerShell and write a small script that identifies the processes by name, and kills them all as fast as it can. That might be the better solution in the long run (assuming Google doesn't come to its senses and stop doing that).
[Edit]
This should do it:
Get-Process -Name chrome | Stop-Process
|
|
|
|
|
I could not update Chrome to latest version until I rebooted my machine. If that did not work, I was going to reinstall per Google's recommendation for the error message I was getting.
All good now.
It's much easier to enjoy the favor of both friend and foe, and not give a damn who's who. -- Lon Milo DuQuette
|
|
|
|
|
steveb wrote: Any ideas?
Download the new Microsoft Edge based on Chromium[^]
All of the Edge Chromium binaries are Microsoft signed. With code integrity guard (CIG) and validate image dependency integrity (VIDI) policies enabled you can ensure that the executable and all dynamic linked libraries are Microsoft signed and trusted. With these policies enabled the browser process will refuse to load anything that is not Microsoft signed.
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settings ⇒ Advanced ⇒ Continue running background apps when Google Chrome is closed
chrome://settings/?search=continue+running+background+apps
Make sure that's turned off.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Control Panel ⇒ Programs and Features ⇒ You can guess the rest.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
also check in the Task Scheduler,
there's usually 2 - 3 entries for chrome - set to auto restart if it detects they exit.
including one that checks for updates every 10 minutes (something stupid like that) as well as at user login and possibly machine start too.
(...and when chrome starts guess what's the first thing it does?)
- sure "safety" but that's just paranoid, and that's from the people that wrote it!
|
|
|
|
|
Don't you have a power button?
|
|
|
|
|
...when I want to just become a monk.
Dealing with an elephant SP. Debugger in SSMS doesn't work. The whole logic of the SP should be in the DSM 5[^] as a definition of insantity.
I just want to run away screaming and never come back. 
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: I just want to run away screaming
Do not do that! I have tried it and it does not work! 
|
|
|
|
|
you probably forgot to do it nude... that's why it didn't work 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
In the nude?  Do you want all people in the street to start screaming in horror?
|
|
|
|
|
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, but you were the one complaining it didn't work the first time.
Well, now you've got the knowledge. Use it as you please!
|
|
|
|
|
Just do what everyone else does....post in QA; "How to convert this to LINQ?"
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I've walked in to more than one place where the had their sprocs loaded with business logic (some > 2000 lines in a single SP). This always made me cringe.
Oh, and the DSM 5 comment...
“The palest ink is better than the best memory.” - Chinese Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe you should consider re-tiring?
(Winter is soon over, and I am certainly planning to re-tire my car to summer tires again.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think it has ever worked, I know I have never used it and I used to love SPs, printed variables have always been my debug tool in SSMS.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP
|
|
|
|
|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: printed variables have always been my debug tool in XXXX
 there are sometimes when they are the easiest way to get relevant information and many times when they are a really good additional help
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: I don't think it has ever worked
Amazingly, Visual Studio (I'm using 2017, I've heard complaints that it doesn't work on 2019) was able to debug the SP. Yay, found the issue in 60 seconds.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
